997
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced prostate cancer using a statistical deformable motion model

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1423-1429 | Received 03 May 2013, Accepted 08 Jun 2013, Published online: 22 Aug 2013

References

  • Smithmans MHP, de Bois J, Sonke JJ, Catton CN, Jaffray DA, Lebesque JV, et al. Residual seminal vesicle displacement in marker-based image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer and the impact on margin design. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:590–6.
  • Van der Wielen G, Mutanga TF, Incrocci L, Kirkels WJ, Vasquez Osorio EM, Hoogeman MS, et al. Deformation of prostate and seminal vesicles relative to intraprostatic fiducial markers,Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:1604–11.
  • Liang J, Wu Q, Yan D. The role of seminal vesicle motion in target margin assessment for online image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73:935–43.
  • Mutanga T, de Boer H, van der Wielen G, Hoogeman M, Incrocci L, Heijmen B. Margin evaluation in the presence of deformation, rotation, and translation in prostate and entire seminal vesicle irradiation with daily marker-based setup corrections. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81: 1160–7.
  • Rossi PJ, Schreibmann E, Jani AB, Master VA, Johnstone PAS. Boost first, eliminate systematic error, and individualize CTV to PTV margin when treating lymph nodes in high-risk prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009; 90:353–8.
  • Lawton CAF, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, Buyyounouski MK, Lee R, Menard C, et al. RTOG GU radiation oncology specialist reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;74:383–7.
  • Hsu A, Pawlicki T, Luxton G, Hara W, King CR. A study of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducials for localized prostate cancer including pelvic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:898–902.
  • Thörnqvist S, Hysing LB, Zolnay AG, Söhn M, Hoogeman MS, Muren LP, et al. Evaluation of PTV margins in radiotherapy of primary and elective targets using a statistical deformable motion model and applied to locally advanced prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol (submitted).
  • Mak D, Gill S, Roxby P, Stillie A, Haworth A, Kron T, et al. Seminal vesicle interfraction displacement and margins in image guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2012;7:139.
  • Wang Z, Wang K, Lerma FA, Liu B, Amin B, Yi B, et al. Planning margins to CTV for image-guided whole pelvis prostate cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy. IJMPCERO 2012;1:23–31.
  • Meijer GJ, de Klerk J, Bzdusek K, van den Berg H, Janssen R, Kaus MR, et al. What CTV-to-PTV margins should be applied for prostate irradiation?Four-dimensional quantitative assessment using model-based deformable image registration techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:1416–25.
  • Harmenberg U, Hamdy FC, Widmark A, Lennernäs B, Nilsson S. Curative radiation therapy in prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2011;50(Suppl 1):98–103.
  • Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, Martinez A. Adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 1997;42:123–32.
  • Vestergaard A, Søndergaard J, Petersen JB, Høyer M, Muren LP. A comparison of three different adaptive strategies in image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1069–76.
  • Bondar L, Hoogeman M, Mens JW, Dhawtal G, de Pree I, Ahmad R, et al. Toward an individualized target motion management for IMRT of cervical cancer based on model-predicted cervix-uterus shape and position. Radiother Oncol 2011;99:240–5.
  • Thörnqvist S, Bentzen L, Petersen JBB, Hysing LB, Muren LP. Plan robustness of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of prostate and lymph nodes for different image-guidance and delivery techniques. Acta Oncol 2011;50:926–34.
  • Nakamura N, Shikama N, Takahashi O, Sekiguchi K, Hama Y, Akahane K, et al. The relationship between the bladder volume and optimal treatment planning in definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2012;51:730–4.
  • Onishi H, Kuriyama K, Komiyama T, Marino K, Araya M, Saito R, et al. Large prostate motion produced by anal contraction. Radiother Oncol 2012;104:390–4.
  • Söhn M, Birkner M, Yan D, Alber M. Modelling individual geometric variation based on dominant eigenmodes of organ deformation: Implementation and evaluation. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:5893–908.
  • Söhn M, Sobotta B, Alber M. Dosimetric treatment course simulation based on a statistical model of deformable organ motion. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:3693–709.
  • Muren LP, Wasbø E, Helle SI, Hysing LB, Karlsdottir A, Odland OH, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced prostate cancer: Planning procedures and early experiences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71:1034–41.
  • Thörnqvist S, Petersen JBB, Høyer M, Bentzen L, Muren LP. Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1023–32.
  • Vásquez Osorio EM, Hoogeman MS, Bondar L, Levendag PC, Heijmen BJM. A novel flexible framework with automatic feature correspondence optimization for nonrigid registration in radiotherapy. Med Phys 2009; 36:2848–59.
  • Bondar L, Hoogeman MS, Vásquez Osorio EM, Heijmen BJM. A symmetric nonrigid registration method to handle large organ deformations in cervical cancer patients. Med Phys 2010;37:3760–72.
  • Budiartho E, Keijzer M, Storchi PR, Hoogeman MS, Bondar L, Mutanga TF, et al. A population-based model to describe geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy: Applied to prostate cases. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:1045–61.
  • Van Herk M, Remeijer P, Rasch C, Lebesque JV. The probability of correct target dosage: Dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:1121–35.
  • Badawi AM, Weiss E, Sleeman WC. Optimizing principal component models for representing interfraction variations in lung cancer radiotherapy. Med Phys 2010;37:5080–91.
  • Fontenla E, Pelizzari CA, Roeske JC, Chen GT. Numerical analysis of a model of organ motion using serial imaging measurements from prostate radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:2337–58.
  • Choi HJ, Kim YS, Lee SH, Lee YS, Park G, Jung JH, et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability in contouring of the prostate gland on planning computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. Acta Oncol 2011; 50:539–46.
  • Gambacorta MA, Valentini C, Dinapoli N, Boldrini L, Caria N, Barba MC, et al. Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of pelvic volumes and normal tissue in rectal tumors using auto-segmentation computed system. Acta Oncol 2013 (in press).
  • De Brabandere M, Hoskin P, Haustermans K, Van den Heuvel F, Siebert FA. Prostate post-implant dosimetry: Interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion. Radiother Oncol 2012;104:192–8.
  • Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Fotina I, Stock M, Pötter R, Goldner G, Georg D. Feasibility of CBCT-based target and normal structure delineation in prostate cancer radiotherapy: Multi-observer and image multi-modality study. Radiother Oncol 2011;98:154–61.
  • Hysing LB, Söhn M, Muren LP, Alber M. A coverage probability based method to estimate patient-specific small bowel planning volumes for use in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011;100:407–11.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.