Interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake amongst young women: A systematic review

References

• Lancuck L, Patnick J, Vessey M. A cohort effect in cervical screening coverage? J Med Screen 2008;15:27–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancucki L, Fender M, Koukari A, Lynge E, Mai V, Mancini E, et al. A fall-off in cervical screening coverage of younger women in developed countries. J Med Screen 2010;17:91–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Cervical Screening Programme, England 2008-09. London: The Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Cervical Screening Programme, England 2007-08. London: The Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews F. The cervical cancer screening epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 2004;364:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:i–vii, 1–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durst M, Gissmann L, Ikenberg H, zur Hausen H. A papillomavirus DNA from a cervical carcinoma and its prevalence in cancer biopsy samples from different geographic regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983;80:3812–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: From basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:342–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynge E, Antilla A, Arbyn M, Segnan N, Ronco G. What’s next? Perspectives and future needs of cervical screening in Europe in the era of molecular testing and vaccination. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:2714–21.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson L, Clements A, Damery S, Wilkinson C, Austoker J, Wilson S. ‘A false sense of security’? Understanding the role of the HPV vaccine on future cervical screening behaviour: A qualitative study of UK parents and girls of vaccination age.J Med Screen 2011;18:41–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knops-Dullens T, de Vries N, de Vries H. Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: An application of the Integrated Model for Behavioural Change. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007;16:436–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacken MA, Braspenning JC, Hermens RP, Spreeuwenberg PM, van den Hoogen HJ, de Bakker DH, et al. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women’s beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization. Eur J Public Health 2007;17:178–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerson K, Gretebeck K. Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2007;19:591–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerson K, Pohl J, Low LK. Personal influencing factors associated with pap smear testing and cervical cancer. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2008;9:50–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blomberg K, Widmark C, Ternestedt B-M, Tornberg S, Tishelman C. Between youth and adulthood: Focus group discussions with 30-year-old women about cervical cancer and its prevention in urban Sweden. Cancer Nurs 2011; 34:E11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L, Wardle J. Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: A qualitative study. BJOG 2012;119:26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavel M, El-Sharaavi N.“I have never heard that one”: Young girls’ knowledge and perception of cervical cancer. J Health Commun 2007;12:707–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black AT, McCulloch A, Martin RE, Kan L. Young women and cervical cancer screening: What barriers persist? Can J Nurs Res 2011;43:8–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahn JA, Chiou V, Allen JD, Goodman E, Perlman SE, Emans SJ. Beliefs about Papanicolaou smears and compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:1046–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. NHS Cervical Screening Programme: Annual Review 2006. Sheffield: NHS Cervical Screening Programme; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng DS, Cox E, Plane MB, Hla KM. Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: A meta- analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:563–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, Martin-Hirsch PL, Forbes CA, Jepson RG. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD002834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black ME, Yamada J, Mann V. A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of community-based strategies to increase cervical cancer screening. Can J Public Health 2002; 93:386–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. NHS Cervical Screening Programme Annual Review 2009. Sheffield: NHS Cervical Screening Programme; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lancucki L, Sasieni P, Patnick J, Day T, Vessey M. The impact of Jade Goody’s diagnosis and death on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. J Med Screen 2012;19:89–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme. Details of HTA project in progress: Strategies to increase cevical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC) Southampton: NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme; 2012 [cited 2012 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.hta.ac.uk/project/2542.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes C, Jepson R, Martin-Hirsch P. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002:CD002834.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby B, Faulkner K, Stamp EC, Whitaker CJ. A descriptive study of the decline in cervical screening coverage rates in the North East and Yorkshire and the Humber Regions of the UK from 1995–2005. J Public Health 2006;28:355–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Eaker S, Adami HO, Granath F, Wilander E, Sparen P. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:346–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell I, Newell C, Rosser W. Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. J Fam Pract 1989;28:420–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell S, Taylor R, Zeckendorf S, Niciak A, Wain G, Ross J. How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW? Aust N Z J Public Health 2005;29:78–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen A, Nieminen P, Luostarinen T, Antilla A. Self-sample HPV tests as an intervention for nonattendees of cervical cancer screening in Finland: A randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1960–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon M, Dowling M. Increasing the uptake of cervical screening programmes. Br J Nurs 2008;17:1280–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twinn S, Cheng F. Increasing uptake rates cervical cancer screening amongst Hong Kong Chinese women: The role of the practitioner. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:335–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottorff JL, Balneaves LG, Sent L, Grewal S, Browne AJ. Cervical cancer screening in ethnocultural groups: Case studies in women-centred care. Women Health 2001;33:29–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelke ND, Vollman R.“Inside and Outside”: Sikh women’s perspectives on cervical cancer screening. Can J Nurs Res 2007;39:174–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blomberg K, Tishelman C, Ternestedt B-M, Tornberg S, Leval A, Widmark C. How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden. Acta Oncol 2011;20:112–20.
   Google Scholar