Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of locally advanced cervical cancer

References

• Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed 2013;26:1004–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1182–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider MA, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Sitartchouk I, Yeung I, Henderson E, et al. Assessment of the tumor microenvironment in cervix cancer using dynamic contrast enhanced CT, interstitial fluid pressure and oxygen measurements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:1100–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsen C, Hompland T, Galappathi K, Mathiesen B, Rofstad EK. DCE-MRI of the hypoxic fraction, radioresponsiveness, and metastatic propensity of cervical carcinoma xenografts. Radiother Oncol 2014;110:335–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyles AW, Milosevic M, Wong R, Kavanagh MC, Pintilie M, Sun A, et al. Oxygenation predicts radiation response and survival in patients with cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 1998;48:149–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen LS, Johansen J, Kallehauge J, Primdahl H, Busk M, Lassen P, et al. FAZA PET/CT hypoxia imaging in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy: Results from the DAHANCA 24 trial. Radiother Oncol 2012;105:14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øvrebø KM, Ellingsen C, Hompland T, Rofstad EK. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the metastatic potential of tumors: A preclinical study of cervical carcinoma and melanoma xenografts. Acta Oncol 2013;52:604–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hompland T, Gulliksrud K, Ellingsen C, Rofstad EK. Assessment of the interstitial fluid pressure of tumors by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with contrast agents of different molecular weights. Acta Oncol 2013;52:627–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hompland T, Ellingsen C, Galappathi K, Rofstad EK. Connective tissue of cervical carcinoma xenografts: Associations with tumor hypoxia and interstitial fluid pressure and its assessment by DCE-MRI and DW-MRI. Acta Oncol 2014;53:6–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halle C, Andersen E, Lando M, Aarnes EK, Hasvold G, Holden M, et al. Hypoxia-induced gene expression in chemoradioresistant cervical cancer revealed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Cancer Res 2012;72:5285–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loncaster JA, Carrington BM, Sykes JR, Jones AP, Todd SM, Cooper R, et al. Prediction of radiotherapy outcome using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;54:759–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen EKF, Hole KH, Lund KV, Sundfør K, Kristensen GB, Lyng H, et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of cervical cancers predict chemoradiotherapy outcome. Radiother Oncol 2013;107: 117–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr NA, Yuh WTC, Jajoura D, Wang JZ, Lo SS, Montebello JF, et al. Ultra-early predictive assay for treatment failure using functional magnetic resonance imaging and clinical prognostic parameters in cervical cancer. Cancer 2010;116:903–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øvrebø KM, Hompland T, Mathiesen B, Rofstad EK. Assessment of hypoxia and radiation response in intramuscular experimental tumors by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol 2012;102: 429–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, Schad LR, Layer G, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:621–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011;66:735–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson SB, West CML, Davidson SE, Carrington BM, Hutchison G, Jones AP, et al. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Application in carcinoma of the cervix. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:691–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fram EK, Herfkens RJ, Johnson GA, Glover GH, Karis JP, Shimakawa A, et al. Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1987;5:201–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallehauge JF, Nielsen T, Haack S, David AP, Mohamed S, Fokdal L, et al. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using DCE-MRI and DCE-CT in locally advanced cervical cancer. Acta Oncol 2013; 52:1360–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sourbron S, Ingrisch M, Siefert A, Reiser M, Herrmann K. Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:205–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Socolow J, Patel S, Pettigrew RI, Oshinski JN. Effect of Gd-DTPA-BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23: 323–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korporaal JG, van Vulpen M, van den Berg CAT, van der Heide UA. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 2012;47:41–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murase K. Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;51: 858–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luypaert R, Sourbron S, Makkat S, de Mey J. Error estimation for perfusion parameters obtained using the two-compartment exchange model in dynamic contrast- enhanced MRI: A simulation study. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:6431–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos JCA, Petrow P, Tanderup K, Petric P, Berger D, Kirisits C, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2012;103:113–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brix G, Zwick S, Kiessling F, Griebel J. Pharmacokinetic analysis of tissue microcirculation using nested models: Multimodel inference and parameter identifiability. Med Phys 2009;36:2923–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Information and likelihood theory: A basis for model selection and inference. In: Burnham K, Anderson D, editors. Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer: New York; 2002. p. 49–97.
   Google Scholar
• Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindegaard JC, Fokdal LU, Nielsen SK, Juul-Christensen J, Tanderup K. MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer from a Nordic perspective. Acta Oncol 2013;52:1510–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach MO, Brindle KM, Evelhoch JL, Griffiths JR, Horsman MR, Jackson A, et al. The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1599–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach MO, Morgan B, Tofts PS, Buckley DL, Huang W, Horsfield MA, et al. Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1451–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar