Deciding about (neo-)adjuvant rectal and breast cancer treatment: Missed opportunities for shared decision making

References

• Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, Frosch D, Legare F, Montori VM, et al. Shared decision making: Really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. Br Med J 2012;344:e256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands. Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• NABON. Breast cancer, Dutch Guideline, version 2.0. [cited 2013 Aug 15]. Available from: http://www.oncoline.nl/mammacarcinoom.
   Google Scholar
• van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EM, Putter H, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:575–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, Glimelius B. Late adverse effects of radiation therapy for rectal cancer – a systematic overview. Acta Oncol 2007;46:504–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Victor A, Bratzel D, Boehm D, Cotarelo C, Lebrecht A, et al. Long-term outcome prediction by clinicopathological risk classification algorithms in node-negative breast cancer – comparison between Adjuvant!, St Gallen, and a novel risk algorithm used in the prospective randomized Node-Negative-Breast Cancer-3 (NNBC-3) trial. Ann Oncol 2009;20:258–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;365:1687–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamelinck VC, Bastiaannet E, Pieterse AH, Jannink I, van de Velde CJ, Liefers GJ, et al. Patients’ preferences for surgical and adjuvant systemic treatment in early breast cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2014;40:1005–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Baas-Thijssen MC, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA. Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: Disease-free patients’ and oncologists’ preferences. Br J Cancer 2007;97:717–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: Examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:276–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couet N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: A systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect Epub 2013 Mar 4.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver K, Jones D, Susnerwala S, Craven O, Tomlinson M, Witham G, et al. Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer. Health Expect 2005;8: 103–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunneman M, Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Nout RA, Kamps M, Lutgens LC, et al. Treatment preferences and involvement in treatment decision making of patients with endometrial cancer and clinicians. Br J Cancer 2014;111:674–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunneman M, Marijnen CAM, Rozema T, Ceha HM, Grootenboers DARH, Neelis KJ, et al. Decision consultations on preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Large variation in benefits and harms that are addressed. Br J Cancer 2015;112:39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt EG, Pieterse AH, van Duijn-Bakker N, van der Hout A, Griffioen AJ, Kroep JR, et al. Partnering or persuading: Decision making during consultations between breast cancer patients and medical oncologists. The 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (abstract) 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, et al. The OPTION scale: Measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect 2005;8:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making 2015;35:114–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple A, Ziebland S, Herxheimer A, McPherson A, Shepperd S, Miller R. Is ‘watchful waiting’ a real choice for men with prostate cancer? A qualitative study. Br J Urol Int 2002;90:257–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel RM, Salyers MP, Bonfils KA, Oles SK, Matthias MS. Agenda setting in psychiatric consultations: An exploratory study. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2013;36:195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: An explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1351–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M, Jr., Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA 1997;277:350–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders HS, Kunneman M, Bonsing BA, de Vries AC, Tollenaar RA, Pieterse AH, et al. Preoperative risk information and patient involvement in surgical treatment for rectal and sigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 2014;16: O43–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar