Effect on gait and socket comfort in unilateral trans-tibial amputees after exchange to a polyurethane concept

References

• Board WJ, Street G M, Caspers C. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001; 25: 202–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra A M, Fidler V, Eisma W H. Walking speed of normal subjects and amputees: aspects of validity of gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 78–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cluitmans J, Geboers M, Deckers J, Rings F. Experiences with respect to the ICEROSS system for trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 78–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniecki J M, Gitter A J. Gait analysis in the amputee: has it helped the amputee or contributed to the development of improved prosthetic components?. Gait Posture 1996; 4: 258–268
   Google Scholar
• Dingwell J B, Davis B L, Frazier D M. Use of an instrumented treadmill for real-time gait symmetry evaluation and feedback in normal and trans-tibial amputee subjects. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20: 101–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehde D M, Czeniecki J M, Smith D G, Campell K M, Edwards W T, Jensen M P, Robinson L R. Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1039–1044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachisuka K, Dozono K, Ogata H, Ohmine S, Shitama H, Shinkoda K. Total surface bearing below-knee prosthesis: advantages, disadvantages, and clinical implications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 783–789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield A G, Morrison J D. Polyurethane gel liner usage in the Oxford Prosthetic Service. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001; 25: 41–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang G-F, Chou Y-L, Su F-C. Gait analysis and energy consumption of below-knee amputees wearing three different prosthetic feet. Gait Posture 2000; 12: 162–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakov E, Burger H, Krajnik J, Gregoric M, Marincek C. Influence of speed on gait parameters and on symmetry in trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20: 153–158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isakov E, Burger H, Krajnik J, Gregoric M, Marincek C. Double-limb support and step-length asymmetry in below-knee amputees. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29: 75–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly K M, Doyle W, Skinner H B. The relationship between gait parameters and pain in persons with transtibial amputation: a preliminary report. J Rehabil Res Dev 1998; 35: 231–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute G K, Kallfelz C F, Czerniecki J M. Mechanical properties of prosthetic limbs: adapting to the patient. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 299–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro M W, Reiber G. Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 155–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J F, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 853–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy S W. Amputees: skin problems and prostheses. Cutis 1995; 55: 297–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon C C, Kulkarni J, Zimerson E, Van Ross E, Beck M H. Skin disorders in amputees. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 501–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson B M, Liedberg E. A clinical standard of stump measurement and classification in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983; 7: 17–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema K, Hermens H J, De Vries J, Koopman H F J M, Eisma W H. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefits. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997a; 21: 17–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema K, Hermens H J, De Vries J, Koopman H F J M, Eisma W H. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 2: subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997b; 21: 28–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prince F, Allard P, Therrien R G, McFadyen B J. Running gait impulse asymmetries in below-knee amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992; 16: 19–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince F, Corriveau H, Hébert R, Winter D A. Gait in elderly. Gait Posture 1997; 5: 128–135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietman J S, Postema K, Geertzen J H B. Gait analysis in prosthetics: opinions, ideas and conclusions. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26: 50–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson R O, Herzog W, Nigg B M. Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1987; 10: 172–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders J E, Greve J M, Clinton C, Hafner B J. Changes in interface pressure and stump shape over time: preliminary results from a trans-tibial amputee subject. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000; 24: 163–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell P, Noroozi S, Vinney J, Andrews S. Developments in trans-tibial prosthetic socket fitting process: a review of past and present research. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000; 24: 97–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder R D, Powers C M, Fontaine C, Perry J. The effect of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound limb in dysvascular below-knee amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32: 309–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter D. Considerations and terminology. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological 2nd edition, D Winter. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data, Waterloo, Canada 1991; 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Roberts C. Comparison of computational analysis with clinical measurement of stresses on below-knee residual limb in a prosthetic socket. Med Eng Phys 2000; 22: 607–612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar