The Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children: Review of development and potential applications

References

• Morris C, Dias L. Paediatric orthotics. London: MacKeith Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Carr A. Outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:313–315.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labelling claims. Food and Drug Administration, 2009. Accessed 20 January 2010 from the website: www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm071975.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London; 2008. Accessed 20 January 2010 from the website: www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Darzi A. Our NHS our future: High quality care for all. NHS next stage review final report. Department of Health, London, 2008. Accessed 20 January 2010 from the website: www.dh.gov.uk/dr_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_085828.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health & Department for Children, Schools and Families. Healthy lives, brighter futures – the strategy for children and young people's health. London, 2009. Accessed 20 January 2010 from the website: www.dh.gov.uk/dr_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_094397.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bosmans J, Geertzen J, Dijkstra PU. Consumer satisfaction with the services of prosthetics and orthotics facilities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(1):69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O'Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27(3):191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998;2(14):1–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajmil L, Herdman M, Fernandez de Sanmamed MJ, Detmar S, Bruil J, Ravens-Sieberer U, Bullinger M, Simeoni MC, Auquier P; Kidscreen Group. Generic health-related quality of life instruments in children and adolescents: A qualitative analysis of content. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34(1):37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, Secnik K, Leidy NK. Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health 2004;7(1):79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Levi R, Drotar D. Critical issues and needs in health-related quality of life assessment of children and adolescents with chronic health conditions. In: Drotar D. editor. Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998. pp 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Wille N, Wetzel R, Nickel J, Bullinger M. Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: Methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24(12):1199–1220.
   Google Scholar
• Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37:72–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André M, Hagelberg S, Stenström CH. The juvenile arthritis foot disability index: Development and evaluation of measurement properties. J Rheumatol 2004;31:2488–2493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roye BD, Vitale MG, Gelijns AC, Roye DP Jr. Patient-based outcomes after clubfoot surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris C, Liabo K, Wright P, Fitzpatrick R. Development of the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire: Finding out how children are affected by foot and ankle problems. Child Care Health Dev 2007;33(5):559–568.
   Google Scholar
• Ronen GM., Rosenbaum P, Law M, Streiner DL. Health-related quality of life in childhood disorders: A modified focus group technique to involve children. Qual Life Res 2001;10:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan M, Gibbs S, Maxwell K, Britten N. Hearing children's voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7–11 years. Qualitat Res 2002;2(1):5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Morris C, Doll H, Wainwright A, Theologis T, Fitzpatrick R. Development of the Oxford ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children: Scaling, reliability and validity. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90B(11):1451–1456.
   Google Scholar
• Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Erhart M, Bruil J, Power M, Duer W, Auquier P, Cloetta B, Czemy L, Mazur J, Czimbalmos A, Tountas Y, Hagquist C, Kilroe J; Kidscreen Group. The Kidscreen-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Value Health 2008;11(4):645–658.
   Google Scholar
• Morris C, Doll H, Wainwright A, Theologis T, Willett K, Fitzpatrick R. The Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children: Responsiveness and longitudinal validity. Quality of Life Research 18(10):1367–1376.
   Google Scholar
• Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epid 2008;61(2):102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003;41(5):582–592.
   Google Scholar