Use of an instrumented treadmill for real-time gait symmetry evaluation and feedback in normal and trans-tibial amputee subjects

References

• Baker P A, Hewison S R. Gait recovery pattern of unilateral lower limb amputees during rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 80–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakey J. Gait of unilateral below-knee amputees. Orthot Prosthet 1976; 30(2)17–24
   Google Scholar
• The Universal Health Care Almanac, L L Cherner. Silver & Cherner, Ltd., PhoenixArizona 1993
   Google Scholar
• Cheung C, Wall J C, Zeun S. A microcomputer-based system for measuring temporal asymmetry in amputee gait. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983; 7: 131–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbourne G R, Olney S J. Feedback of joint angle and EMG in gait of able-bodied subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 478–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis B L, Cavanagh P R, Bock R, Sommer H J. Measuring ground reaction forces in a zero-gravity locomotion simulator. Proceedings of the Xlllth International Conference on Biomechanics. University of Western Australia, Perth 1991; 336–338
   Google Scholar
• DeLuccia N, De Souza Pinto M AG, Guedes J PB, Albers M TV. Rehabilitation after amputation for vascular disease: a follow-up study. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992; 16: 124–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwell J B, Davis B L. Technical note: a rehabiliation treadmill with software for providing real-time gait analysis and visual feedback. J Biomech Eng 1995, Submitted for publication to
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernie G, Holden J, Soto M. Biofeedback training of knee control in the above-knee amputee. Am J Phys Med 1978; 57: 161–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gapsis J J, Grabois M, Borrell R M, Menken S A, Kelly M. Limb load monitor: evaluation of a sensory feedback device for controlled weight bearing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 38–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthd-r-Gagnon C, StPierre D, Drown G, Riley E. Augmented sensory feedback in the early training of standing balance in below-knee amputees. Physiotherapy Canada 1986; 38: 137–142
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson L A, Valle D R, Barr A E, Danoff J V, Stanhope S I, Snyder-Mackle L. Bilateral analysis of the knee and ankle during gait: an examination of the relationship between lateral dominance and symmetry. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 640–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris K A, Van Schie L, Carroll S E, Deathe A, Maryniak O, Meads G E, Sweeney J P. Rehabilitation potential of elderly patients with major amputations. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1991; 32: 463–467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog W, Nigg B M, Read L J, Olsson E. Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Med Sci Sports Exer 1989; 21: 110–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa S. Normal gait charactheristics under temporal and distance constraints. J Biomed Eng 1989; 11: 449–456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirokawa S, Matsumura K. Biofeedback gait training system for temporal and distance factors. Med Biol Eng Comp 1989; 27: 8–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapp S, Cummings D. Transtibial amputation: prosthetic management. Atlas of Limb Prosthetics./ 2nd edl American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. CV Mosby, St Louis 1992; 453–478
   Google Scholar
• Kram R, Powell A J. A treadmill mounted force platform. J Appl Physiol 1989; 67: 1692–1698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore T J, Barron J, Hutcmnson F, Golden C, Ellis C, Humphries D. Prosthetic usage after major lower extremity amputation. Clin Orthop 1989; 238: 219–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenrot P, Wall J C, Charteris J. The relationship between velocity, stride time, support time and swing time during normal walking. J Hum Move Stud 1980; 6: 323–335
   Google Scholar
• Seliktar R, Mizrahi J. Some gait characteristics of below-knee amputees and their reflection on the ground reaction forces. Eng Med 1986; 15: 27–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner H B, Effeney D J. Gait analysis in amputees. Am J Phys Med 1985; 64: 82–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 92 -1774, Vital and Health Statistics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD 1992
   Google Scholar
• Wall J C. Symmetry of gait kinematics in healthy young adult males. Gait Analysis and Medical Photogrammetry proceedings. Orthopaedic Engineering Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford 1987; 30–31
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A B. Limb ProstheticsJ 6th ed. Demos Publications, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Winter D A, Sienko S E. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biomech 1988; 21: 361–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahedi M S, Spence W D, Solomonidis S E, Paul J P. Repeatability of kinetic and kinematic measurements in gait studies of the lower limb amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int 1987; 11: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar