Biomechanical gait evaluation of the immediate effect of orthotic treatment for flexible flat foot

Reference

• Areblad M, Nigg B M, Ekstrand J, Olsson K O, Ekstrom H. Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running. J Biomech 1990; 23: 933–940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmajian J V, Deluca CJ. Muscle Alives. Williams & Wilkins., Baltimore 1985; p310–353
   Google Scholar
• Beckman S. Comment on: The foot and chondromalacia: a case of biomechanical uncertainty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1980; 2: 51–53
   Google Scholar
• Berger N, Edelstein J E, Fishman S, Hoffman E, Kaufman M, Krebs D, Springer WP. Lowerlimb orthotics. New York University., New York 1981; p23–47
   Google Scholar
• Bettman E. The treatment of flatfoot by means of exercise. J Bone Joint Surg 1937; 19: 821–825
   Google Scholar
• Bleck E E, Berzins UJ. Conservative management of pes valgus with plantarflexed talus. Clini Orthop 1977; 122: 85–94
   Google Scholar
• Bordelon RL. Correction of hypermobile flatfoot in children by moulded insert. Foot Ankle 1980; 1: 143–150
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh P R, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987; 20: 547–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler FA. Children's feet: normal and presenting common abnormalities. Am J Dis Child 1942; 63: 1136
   Google Scholar
• Chang A, Abu-Faraj Z U, Harris G F, Nery J. Multistep measurement of plantar pressure alternations using metatarsal pads. Foot Ankle 1994; 15: 654–660
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J C, Chan P S, Hui PW. Joint laxity in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1991; 11: 752–756
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colson L M, Berolund G. An effective orthotic design for controlling the clustable subtablar joint. Orthot Prosthet 1977; 33(7)39–49
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall M W, McPoil TG. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3 dimensional rearfoot motion during walking. Clin Biomech 1995; 10: 36–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill J, Bates B T, Knutzen K M, Kilpatrick GM. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech 1989; 4: 217–225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfet AJ. Disorders of the foot. J BLippincott., Philadelphia 1980; p43–51
   Google Scholar
• Hennig E M, Staats A, Rosenbaum D. Plantar pressure distribution pattens of young school children in comparison to adults. Foot Ankle 1994; 15: 35–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderson W H, Campbell JW. UC-BL shoe insert: casting and fabrication, Technical Report. Biomechanics Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco 1967; 53.
   Google Scholar
• Hoke M. An operation for the correction of extremely relaxed flatfeet. J Bone Joint Surg 1931; 13: 733
   Google Scholar
• Kogler G F, Solomonidis S E, Paul JP. Biomechanics of longitudinal arch support mechanisms in foot orthoses and their effect on plantar aponeurosis strain. Clin Biomech 1996; 11: 243–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell W W, Price C T, Meehan PL. The Foot. Pediatric Orthopaedics.2nd edition., WW. Lovell, BB. Winter. JB Lippincott., Philadelphia 1986; p895–977
   Google Scholar
• Mann RA. Biomechanics of running. Symposium on the foot and leg in running sports., RP. Mack. CV Mosby, St Louis 1992; p1–29
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch M U, Brunt D, Ltnden DV. The effect of foot orthotic and gait velocity on lower limb kinematics and temporal events of stance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993; 17: 69–72
   Google Scholar
• McPoil TG, Schult D, Knecht HG. Comparison of three methods used to obtain a neutral plaster foot impression. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 448–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SJ. Collapsing pes valgoplanus (flexible flatfoot). Principles and practice of podiatric medicine, LA. Levy, VJ. Hetherington. Churchill Livingstone., New York 1990; p891–903
   Google Scholar
• NlGG BM. Biomechanics of running shoes. Human Kinetics Publ., Illinois 1986; p41–48
   Google Scholar
• Novick A, Kelley D. Position and movement changes of the foot with orthotic intervention during the loading response of gait. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990; 11: 301–312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penneau K, Lutter L D, Winter RB. Pes planus radiographic changes with foot orthoses and shoes. Foot Ankle 1982; 2: 299–303
   Google Scholar
• Raming D, Shadle J, Watkws C A, Cavolo D, Kreutzberg JR. The foot and sports medicine - biomechanical foot faults as related to chondromalacia patellae. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1980; 2: 48–50
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers M M, Le Veau B. Effectiveness of foot orthotic devices used to modify pronation in runners. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1982; 4: 86–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Root M L, Orien W P, Weed JN. Normal and abnormal function of the foot: clinical biomechanics. Clinical Biomechanicas Corp, Los Angeles, CA 1977; Vol. II.
   Google Scholar
• Rose G K, Welton E A, Marshall T. The diagnosis of flat foot in the child. J Bone Joint Surg 1985; 67B: 71–78
   Google Scholar
• Smith L, Clarke T, Hamill C. The effects of soft and semi-rigid orthoses upon rearfoot movement in running. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1986; 76: 227–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger D R, Diego S, Mauldin D, Speck G, Morgan D, Lieber. Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71A: 800–810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadek I. Transverse-wedge arthrodesis for the relief of pain in rigid flat-foot. J Bone Joint Surg 1935; 17
   Google Scholar