Primary metatarsalgia: The influence of a custom moulded insole and a rockerbar on plantar pressure

Reference

• Bennett P, Miskewttch V, Duplock L. Analysis of the effects of custom moulded foot orthtics. Gait Posture 1994; 3: 183
   Google Scholar
• Benvenuti F, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J M, Gangemi S, Baroni A. Foot pain and disability in older persons: an epidemiologic survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 479–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birke J A, Sims D S, Buford WL. Walking casts: effect of plantar foot pressures. J Rehabil Res Dev 1985; 22: 18–22
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh P R, Sims D S, Sanders LJ. Body mass is a poor predictor of peak plantar pressure in diabetic men. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 750–751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang A H, Abu Faraj Z U, Harris G F, Ney J, Shereff MJ. Multistep measurement of plantar pressure alterations using metatarsal pads. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 654–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Nigg B M, Jde Koning. Relationship between plantar pressure distribution under the foot and insole comfort. Clin Biomech 1994; 9: 335–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman WC. The relief of pressures using outer shoe sole modifications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomechanics and Clinical Kinesiology of the Hand and Foot., K MothiramiPatil, H. Srinivasa. Indian Institute of Technology., MadrasIndia 1985; p29–31
   Google Scholar
• Flot S, Hill V, Yamada W, McPoil T G, Cornwall MW. The effect of padded hosiery in reducing forefoot plantar pressures. Lower Extremity 1995; 2: 201–205
   Google Scholar
• Hennig D M, Valiant G A, Liu Q. Relationship between perception of cushioning and pressure distribution parameters in running shoes, (abstracts). J Biomech 1993; 27: 669
   Google Scholar
• Herschel H, Pvan Meel. Report. Inquiry among elderly among problems with feet and shoes. Stichting Voet en Schoeisel, WaalwijkThe Netherlands 1978
   Google Scholar
• Holmes GB. Quantitative determination of intermetatarsal pressure. Foot Ankle 1992; 13: 532–535
   Google Scholar
• Holmes G B, Timmerman L. A quantitative assessment of the effect of metatarsal pads on plantar pressures. Fool Ankle 1990–91; 11: 141–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kernozek T W, LaMott EE. Comparisons of plantar pressures between the elderly and young adults. Gait Posture 1995; 3: 143–148
   Google Scholar
• Lord M, Hosein R. Pressure redistribution by moulded inserts in diabetic footwear: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1994; 31: 214–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nawoczenski D A, Birke J A, Coleman WC. Effect of rocker sole design on plantar forefoot pressures. J Am Podiatri Med Assoc 1988; 78: 455–460
   Google Scholar
• Novick A, Birke J A, Hoard A S, Brasseaux D M, Broussard J B, Hawkins ES. Rigid orthoses for the insensitive foot: the “rigid-relief orthosis”. J Prosthet Orthot. 1991a; 4(1)31–40
   Google Scholar
• Novick A, Birke J A, Graham S L, Koziatek E. Effect of a walking splint and total contact casts on plantar forces. J Prosthet Orthot 1991b; 3: 168–178
   Google Scholar
• Peaterson M J, Perry J, Montgomery J. Walking patterns of healthy subjects wearing rocker shoes. Phys Ther 1985; 65: 1483–1489
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds JC. Developmental disorders: adult foot Part 2. Metatarsalgia. The foot book, JS. Gould. Wiliams & Wilkins., Baltimore 1988; p219–227
   Google Scholar
• Schaff P S, Cavanagh PR. Shoes for the insensitive foot: the effect of a “rocker bottom” shoe modification on plantar pressure distribution. Foot Ankle 1990; 11: 129–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiba N, Kitaoka H B, Cahalan T D, Chao E YS. Shock-absorbing effect of shoe insert materials commonly used in management of lower extremity disorders. Clin Orthop 1995; 310: 130–136
   Google Scholar
• Silfverskiold JP. Relieving the pain of bunions, keratoses, corns and calluses. Postgrad Med 1991; 89: 183–188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch J J, Frank L W, Zhu H, Price M B, Harris G F, Alba HM. Plantar pressures with total casting. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32: 205–209
   Google Scholar