Relaxed versus activated stump muscles during casting for trans-tibial prostheses

References

• Armitage P, Beery G. Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell, Oxford 1987
   Google Scholar
• bader Dchase A. The patient-orthosis interface. Biomechanical basis of orthotic management, P Bowker, D M Condie, D L Bader, D J. Pratt. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford 1993; 58–69
   Google Scholar
• Basmajian J V, De Luca C J. Muscles alive: their functions revealed by electromyography. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985
   Google Scholar
• Breakey J W. Body image: the lower-limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 9: 58–66
   Google Scholar
• Brüssel A. CAD/CAM in protetik und orthetik -stand der technik (CAD/CAM in prosthetics and orthotics - state of the art). Orthop Tech 1991; 42: 487–495
   Google Scholar
• Buis A WP. Dynamic interface pressure measurement: comparing 2 trans-tibial sockets concepts. Glasgow: National Centre for Training and Education in Prosthetics and Orthotics. Thesis, University of Strathclyde. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Burgess E M, Alexander A G, Rebenstein C P. The effect of stump-muscle activity on socket suspensions and prosthetic control: a preliminary report. Inter-Clinic Information Bulletin 1974; 13(15)11–17
   Google Scholar
• Culham E G, Peat M, Newell E. Below-knee amputation: a comparison of the effect of the SACK foot and single axis foot on electromyographic patterns during locomotion. Prosthet Orthot Int 1986; 10: 15–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson U, Lemperg R. Roentgenological study of movements of the amputation stump within the prosthesis socket in below-knee amputees fitted with a PTB prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 1970; 40: 520–529
   Google Scholar
• Paul F, Erdfelder E. GPower A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS (Computer programme). Bonn Unversity, Dept. Psychology, BonnFRG 1992
   Google Scholar
• Fung Y C. Bioviscoelastic solids. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York 1993; 242–320
   Google Scholar
• Fillauer C E, Pritman C H, Fillauer K D. Evolution and development of the Silicone Suction Socket (3S) for below-knee prostheses. J Prosthet Orthot 1989; 1: 92–103
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé M C. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliablity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1309–1314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grevsten S, Eriksson U. A roentgenological study of the stump-socket contact and skeletal displacement in the PTB-suction prostheses. Upsala J Med Sci 1975; 80: 49–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grevsten S, Stalberg E. Electomyographic study of muscular activity in the amputation stump while walking with PTB- and PTB-suction prosthesis. Upsala J Med Sci 1975; 80: 103–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisé M C, Gauthier-Gagnon C, Martineau G G. Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 862–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyton A C, Hall J E. Membrane physiology, nerve and muscle. Textbook of medical physiology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1996; 43–72
   Google Scholar
• Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C, Persson B M, Roxendal G. Gait in male trans-tibial amputees: a comparative study with healthy subjects in relation to walking speed. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 68–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard W A, McElroy G K. Benchmark data for elderly, vascular trans-tibial amputees after rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 142–149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson S, Öberg T. Accuracy and precision of volumetric determinations using 2 commercial CAD systems for prosthetics: a technical note. J Rehabil Res Dev 1998; 35: 27–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapp S, Cummings D. Prosthetic management. Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic and rehabilitation principles, J H Bowker, J W. Michael. Mosby Year Book, St Louis 1992; 453–478, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
   Google Scholar
• Klasson B. Appreciation of prosthetic socket fitting from basic engineering principles. Glasgow: National Centre for Training and Education in Prosthetics and Orthotics. University of Strathclyde. 1995
   Google Scholar
• Kristinsson O. The ICECROSS concept: a discussion of a philosophy. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 49–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy S W. Skin problems of the amputee. Warren Green, Inc., St Louis 1983
   Google Scholar
• Lilja M, Johansson T. Adherent cicatrix after below-knee amputation. J Prosthet Orthot 1993; 5: 65–66
   Google Scholar
• Lilja M, Öberg T. Proper time for definitive trans-tibial prosthetic fitting. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 9: 90–95
   Google Scholar
• Lilja M, Öberg T. Morphological changes during early trans-tibial prosthetic fitting. In print: Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch G. The “Dundee” Socket for the below-knee amputation. Prosthet Int 1968; 3: 15–21
   Google Scholar
• Pike A C. The next revolution in prosthetics: the PRE. Biomechanics Magazine 1996
   Google Scholar
• , http://wwwbiomechcom/db_area/archives/specia/Oan dP296/scopehtml
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe C W, Foort J. The patellar-tendon-bearing below-knee prosthesis. San Francisco: University of California, Berkeley 1961
   Google Scholar
• Silver-Thorn M B, Childress D S. Parametric analysis using the finite element method to investigate prosthetic interface stresses for persons with transtibial amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 1996; 33: 227–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonck W A, Cockrell J L, Koepke G H. Effect of liner materials on interface pressures in below-knee prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 666–669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittle M W. Normal gait. Gait analysis: an introduction. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford 1991; 48–90
   Google Scholar
• Winter D A, Sienko S E. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biomech 1988; 21: 361–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar