Characterising the surface adhesive behavior of tablet tooling components by atomic force microscopy

References

• Chow K, Tong HH, Lum S, Chow AH. (2008). Engineering of pharmaceutical materials: an industrial perspective. J Pharm Sci, 97:2855–2877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey AJ, Mansour HM, Telko MJ, Xu Z, Smyth HD, Mulder T et al. (2007). Physical characterization of component particles included in dry powder inhalers. I. Strategy review and static characteristics. J Pharm Sci, 96:1282–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. (2005). What can we learn from atomic force microscopy adhesion measurements with single drug particles? Eur J Pharm Sci, 24:153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth SW, Newton JM. (1987). Experimental investigation of adhesion between powders and surfaces. J Pharm Pharmacol, 39:679–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King H. (2007). The Practical Guide to Tableting. Victoria, Canada: Trafford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Toyoshima K, Yasumura M, Ohnishi N, Ueda Y. (1988). Quantitative evolution of tablet sticking by surface roughness measurement. Int J Pharm, 46:211–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaberi A, Chatterji A, Shah NH, Sandhu HK. (2009). Functional performance of silicified microcrystalline cellulose versus microcrystalline cellulose: a case study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 35:1066–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anuar MS, Briscoe BJ. (2009). The elastic relaxation of starch tablets during ejection. Powder Technol, 195:96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam KK, Newton JM. (1991). Investigation of applied compression on the adhesion of powders to a substrate surface. Powder Technol, 65:167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F. (1999). Investigations into the reduction of powder adhesion to stainless steel surfaces by surface modification to aid capsule filling. Int J Pharm, 178:93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JJ, Li T, Bateman SD, Erck R, Morris KR. (2003). Modeling of adhesion in tablet compression–I. Atomic force microscopy and molecular simulation. J Pharm Sci, 92:798–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wen H, Desai D. (2010). Lubrication in tablet formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, In press, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata Y, Fujii M, Noda S, Kokudai M, Okada H, Kondoh M et al. (2006). Fluidity and tableting characteristics of a powder solid dispersion of the low melting drugs ketoprofen and ibuprofen with crospovidone. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 32:449–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts M, Ford JL, MacLeod GS, Fell JT, Smith GW, Rowe PH. (2003). Effects of surface roughness and chrome plating of punch tips on the sticking tendencies of model ibuprofen formulations. J Pharm Pharmacol, 55:1223–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabir A, Evans B, Jain S. (2001). Formulation and process optimization to eliminate picking from market image tablets. Int J Pharm, 215:123–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C-Y, Hancock BC, Mills A, Bentham AC, Best SM, Elliot JA. (2008). Numerical and experimental investigation of capping mechanisms during pharmaceutical tablet compaction. Powder Technol, 181:121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumann S, Searle GD. (1992). The effects of chromium nitride ION bombardment treatment of tablet tooling on tablet adherence. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 18:1037–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrove A, Augsburger LL. (1980). Adhesion of tablets in a rotary tablet press I. Instrumentation and preliminary study of variables affecting adhesion. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 6:331–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker M, Davies M, Roberts C. (2005). Towards screening of inhalation formulations: measuring interactions with atomic force microscopy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2:613–624.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Begat P, Morton DA, Staniforth JN, Price R. (2004). The cohesive-adhesive balances in dry powder inhaler formulations I: Direct quantification by atomic force microscopy. Pharm Res, 21:1591–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eve JK, Patel N, Luk SY, Ebbens SJ, Roberts CJ. (2002). A study of single drug particle adhesion interactions using atomic force microscopy. Int J Pharm, 238:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooton JC, German CS, Allen S, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Tendler SJ et al. (2004). An atomic force microscopy study of the effect of nanoscale contact geometry and surface chemistry on the adhesion of pharmaceutical particles. Pharm Res, 21:953–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooton JC, Jones MD, Harris H, Shur J, Price R. (2008). The influence of crystal habit on the prediction of dry powder inhalation formulation performance using the cohesive-adhesive force balance approach. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 34:974–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louey MD, Mulvaney P, Stewart PJ. (2001). Characterisation of adhesional properties of lactose carriers using atomic force microscopy. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 25:559–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young PM, Price R, Lewis D, Edge S, Traini D. (2003). Under pressure: predicting pressurized metered dose inhaler interactions using the atomic force microscope. J Colloid Interface Sci, 262:298–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James J, Crean B, Davies M, Toon R, Jinks P, Roberts CJ. (2008). The surface characterisation and comparison of two potential sub-micron, sugar bulking excipients for use in low-dose, suspension formulations in metered dose inhalers. Int J Pharm, 361:209–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Ebbens S, Chen X, Jin Z, Luk S, Madden C et al. (2006). Determination of the surface free energy of crystalline and amorphous lactose by atomic force microscopy adhesion measurement. Pharm Res, 23:401–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson VM, Cao X. (2008). Evaluating particle hardness of pharmaceutical solids using AFM nanoindentation. Int J Pharm, 362:163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins M, Ebbens SJ, Hayes S, Roberts CJ, Madden CE, Luk SY et al. (2007). Elastic modulus measurements from individual lactose particles using atomic force microscopy. Int J Pharm, 332:168–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perkins MC, Bunker M, James J, Rigby-Singleton S, Ledru J, Madden-Smith C et al. (2009). Towards the understanding and prediction of material changes during micronisation using atomic force microscopy. Eur J Pharm Sci, 38:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker MJ, Davies MC, Chen X, James MB, Roberts CJ. (2006). Single particle friction on blister packaging materials used in dry powder inhalers. Eur J Pharm Sci, 29:405–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J. (2004). Intrinsic adhesion force of lubricants to steel surface. j Pharm Sci, 93:2310–2318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber D, Pu Y, Clooney CL. (2008). Quantification of lubricant activity of magnesium stearate by atomic force microscopy. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 22:1105–1120.
   Google Scholar
• Beach ER, Tormoen GW, Drelich J, Han R. (2002). Pull-off force measurements between rough surfaces by atomic force microscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci, 247:84–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper K, Ohler N, Gupta A, Beaudoin S. (2000). Analysis of Contact Interactions between a Rough Deformable Colloid and a Smooth Substrate. J Colloid Interface Sci, 222:63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götzinger M, Peukert W. (2003). Dispersive forces of particle–surface interactions: direct AFM measurements and modelling. Powder Technology, 130:102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Rudolph V, Peukert W. (2005). London-van der Waals adhesiveness of rough particles. Powder Technology, 161:248–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R, Pollock HM, Cleaver JAS, Hodges CS. (2002). Adhesion forces between glass and silicon surfaces in air studied by AFM: Effects of relative humidity, particle size, roughness, and surface treatment. Langmuir, 18:8045–8055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F, Newton JM, James MB. (1997). Variations in the adhesion force between a drug and carrier particles as a result of changes in the relative humidity of the air. Int J Pharm, 149:151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Qian L. (2000). Investigation humidity dependent capillary force. Langmuir, 16:8153–8158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker MJ, Davies MC, James MB, Roberts CJ. (2007). Direct observation of single particle electrostatic charging by atomic force microscopy. Pharm Res, 24:1165–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt HJ, Kappl M. (2009). Normal capillary forces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 146:48–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young PM, Price R, Tobyn MJ, Buttrum M, Dey F. (2003). Investigation into the effect of humidity on drug-drug interactions using the atomic force microscope. J Pharm Sci, 92:815–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young PM, Price R, Tobyn MJ, Buttrum M, Dey F. (2004). The influence of relative humidity on the cohesion properties of micronized drugs used in inhalation therapy. J Pharm Sci, 93:753–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bérard V, Lesniewska E, Andrès C, Pertuy D, Laroche C, Pourcelot Y. (2002). Dry powder inhaler: influence of humidity on topology and adhesion studied by AFM. Int J Pharm, 232:213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bérard V, Lesniewska E, Andrès C, Pertuy D, Laroche C, Pourcelot Y. (2002). Affinity scale between a carrier and a drug in DPI studied by atomic force microscopy. Int J Pharm, 247:127–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Blum AS, Aston DE, Buenviaje C, Overney RM, Luginbuhl R. (2001). Critical phenomena of water bridges in nanoasperity contacts. J Chem Phys, 114:1355–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Lio A, Hu J, Ogletree DF, Salmeron M. (1998). Wetting and capillary phenomena of water on mica. J Phys Chem B, 102:540–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam N, Stewart P, Larson I, Hartley P. (2005). Surface roughness contribution to the adhesion force distribution of salmeterol xinafoate on lactose carriers by atomic force microscopy. J Pharm Sci, 94:1500–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traini D, Young PM, Jones M, Edge S, Price R. (2006). Comparative study of erythritol and lactose monohydrate as carriers for inhalation: atomic force microscopy and in vitro correlation. Eur J Pharm Sci, 27:243–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young PM, Cocconi D, Colombo P, Bettini R, Price R, Steele DF et al. (2002). Characterization of a surface modified dry powder inhalation carrier prepared by “particle smoothing”. J Pharm Pharmacol, 54:1339–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Ata A, Singh RK, Moudgil BM. (2000). Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci, 232:10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Ata A, Singh RK, Moudgil BM. (2000). Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci, 232:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumpf H. (1990). Particle Technology. London/New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Israelachvili JN (1992). Intermolecular and Surface Forces. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter JL, Bechhoefer J. (1993). Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev Sci Instrum, 64:1868–1873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard R. (2009). Personal communication, discussion on the practical application of coated tablet punch faces in industry. IHolland Ltd, Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Qian J, Gao H. (2009). Effects of capillary condensation in adhesion between rough surfaces. Langmuir, 25:11727–11731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakarinen OH, Foster AS, Paajanen M, Kalinainen T, Katainen J, Makkonen I, Lahtinen J, Nieminen RM. (2005). Towards an accurate description of the capillary force in nanoparticle-surface interactions. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng, 13:1175–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar