Comparison of pharmacokinetics in beagle dogs of nimesulide bilayer tablets with dispersible tablets

References

• Mandal U, Pal TK. (2008). Formulation and in vitro studies of a fixed-dose combination of a bilayer matrix tablet containing metformin HCl as sustained release and glipizide as immediate release. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 34:305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patra CN, Kumar AB, Pandit HK, Singh SP, Devi MV. (2007). Design and evaluation of sustained release bilayer tablets of propranolol hydrochloride. Acta Pharm, 57:479–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamza Yel-S, Aburahma MH. (2010). Design and in vitro evaluation of novel sustained- release matrix tablets for lornoxicam based on the combination of hydrophilic matrix formers and basic pH-modifiers. Pharm Dev Technol, 15:139–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamachari Y, Madan P, Lin S. (2007). Development of pH- and time-dependent oral microparticles to optimize budesonide delivery to ileum and colon. Int J Pharm, 338:238–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbenberg R, Kim JS, Amidon GL. (2005). Pharmacokinetics of an immediate release, a controlled release and a two pulse dosage form in dogs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 60:17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaterre V, Ogorka J, Loggia N, Gurny R. (2009). Oral osmotically driven systems: 30 years of development and clinical use. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 73:311–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaterre V, Ogorka J, Loggia N, Gurny R. (2009). Approach to design push-pull osmotic pumps. Int J Pharm, 376:56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaraju R, Meera DS, Kaza R, Arvind VV, Venkateswarlu V. (2009). Core-in-cup tablet design of metoprolol succinate and its evaluation for controlled release. Curr Drug Discov Technol, 6:299–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nirmal J, Saisivam S, Peddanna C, Muralidharan S, Godwinkumar S, Nagarajan M. (2008). Bilayer tablets of atorvastatin calcium and nicotinic acid: formulation and evaluation. Chem Pharm Bull, 56:1455–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, Huang J, Jiao Y, Shan L, Liu Y, Li Y et al. (2006). In vitro release and in vivo absorption in beagle dogs of meloxicam from Eudragit FS 30 D-coated pellets. Int J Pharm, 322:104–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes CM, Lobo JM, Pinto JF, Costa PC. (2007). Compressed matrix core tablet as a quick/slow dual-component delivery system containing ibuprofen. AAPS PharmSciTech, 8:E76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trapani G, Lopedota A, Boghetich G, Latrofa A, Franco M, Sanna E et al. (2003). Encapsulation and release of the hypnotic agent zolpidem from biodegradable polymer microparticles containing hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Int J Pharm, 268:47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaithiyalingam SR, Sayeed VA. (2010). Critical factors in manufacturing multi layer tablets–assessing material attributes, in-process controls, manufacturing process and product performance. Int J Pharm, 398:9–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burns SJ, Corness D, Hay G, Higginbottom S, Whelan I, Attwood D, Barnwell SG. (1995). Development and validation of an in vitro dissolution method for a floating dosage form with biphasic release characteristics. Int J Pharm, 121:37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Burns SJ, Corness D, Hay G, Higginbottom S, Whelan I, Attwood D, Barnwell SG. (1996). An in vitro assessment of liquid-filled Capill® potato starch capsules with biphasic release characteristics. Int J Pharm, 134:223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Redhead HM, Davis SS, Illum L. (2001). Drug delivery in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles surface modified with poloxamer 407 and poloxamine 908: in vitro characterisation and in vivo evaluation. J Control Release, 70:353–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Chen Z, Wei X, Sun N, Lu Y, Wu W. (2007). Biphasic release of indomethacin from HPMC/pectin/calcium matrix tablet: I. Characterization and mechanistic study. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 67:707–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heigoldt U, Sommer F, Daniels R, Wagner KG. (2010). Predicting in vivo absorption behavior of oral modified release dosage forms containing pH-dependent poorly soluble drugs using a novel pH-adjusted biphasic in vitro dissolution test. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 76:105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha MO, Nasser W, Ardakani A, Alkhatib HS. (2008). Sodium lauryl sulfate impedes drug release from zinc-crosslinked alginate beads: switching from enteric coating release into biphasic profiles. Int J Pharm, 350:291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu XM, Wang YS, Chen RY, Feng CL, Yao F, Tong SS et al. (2011). Formulation and pharmacokinetic evaluation of tetracycline-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for subcutaneous injection in mice. Chem Pharm Bull, 59:260–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seju U, Kumar A, Sawant KK. (2011). Development and evaluation of olanzapine-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for nose-to-brain delivery: in vitro and in vivo studies. Acta Biomater, 7:4169–4176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraogia GK, Guptab P, Guptab UD, Jain NK, Agrawala GP. (2010). Gelatin nanocarriers as potential vectors for effective management of tuberculosis. Int J Pharm, 385:143–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rupenthal ID, Green CR, Alany RG. (2011). Comparison of ion-activated in situ gelling systems for ocular drug delivery. Part 2: Precorneal retention and in vivo pharmacodynamic study. Int J Pharm, 411:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shameem M, Katori N, Aoyagi N, Kojima S. (1995). Oral solid controlled release dosage forms: role of GI-mechanical destructive forces and colonic release in drug absorption under fasted and fed conditions in humans. Pharm Res, 12:1049–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Deng D, Lu Y, Wu W. (2008). Biphasic release of indomethacin from HPMC/pectin/calcium matrix tablet: II. Influencing variables, stability and pharmacokinetics in dogs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 69:294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan LF, He W, Bai M, Du Q, Xiang B, Chang YZ et al. (2008). Biphasic drug release: permeability and swelling of pectin/ethylcellulose films, and in vitro and in vivo correlation of film-coated pellets in dogs. Chem Pharm Bull, 56:1118–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori-Kwakye K, Fell JT, Sharma HL, Smith AM. (2004). Gamma scintigraphic evaluation of film-coated tablets intended for colonic or biphasic release. Int J Pharm, 270:307–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellis D, Giaginis C, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A. (2007). Physicochemical profile of nimesulide. Exploring the interplay of lipophilicity, solubility and ionization. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 44:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donbrow M, Samuelov Y. (1980). Zero order drug delivery from double-layered porous films: release rate profiles from ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose and polyethylene glycol mixtures. J Pharm Pharmacol, 32:463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T. (1961). Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. J Pharm Sci, 50:874–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koresmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker EM, Buri R, Peppas NA. (1983). Mechanism of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm, 15:25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SH, Choi HK. (2006). The effects of surfactants on the dissolution profiles of poorly water-soluble acidic drugs. Int J Pharm, 321:35–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoukri RA, Ahmed IS, Shamma RN. (2009). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of nimesulide lyophilized orally disintegrating tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 73:162–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar