Preparation and antitumor activity of bFGF-mediated active targeting doxorubicin microbubbles

References

• Husseini GA, Pitt WG. (2008). The use of ultrasound and micelles in cancer treatment. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 8:2205–2215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu CT, Zhao YZ, Wu Y, Tian XQ, Li WF, Huang PT et al. (2011). Experiment on enhancing antitumor effect of intravenous epirubicin hydrochloride by acoustic cavitation in situ combined with phospholipid-based microbubbles. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 68:343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SL, MacDonald RC. (2004). Acoustically active liposomes for drug encapsulation and ultrasound-triggered release. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1665(1–2):134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Takizawa T, Negishi Y, Utoguchi N, Maruyama K. (2008). Effective gene delivery with novel liposomal bubbles and ultrasonic destruction technology. Int J Pharm, 354(1–2):49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortencarier MJ, Dayton PA, Bloch SH, Schumann PA, Matsunaga TO, Ferrara KW. (2004). A method for radiation-force localized drug delivery using gas-filled lipospheres. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 51(7):822–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhr G, Moan J. (2006). Synergistic and tumour selective effects of chemotherapy and ultrasound treatment. Cancer Lett, 232:206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal I, Sostaric JZ, Riesz P. (2004). Sonodynamic therapy–a review of the synergistic effects of drugs and ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem, 11:349–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder A, Avnir Y, Weisman S, Najajreh Y, Gabizon A, Talmon Y et al. (2007). Controlling liposomal drug release with low frequency ultrasound: mechanism and feasibility. Langmuir, 23:4019–4025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Kennedy AM, Christensen DA, Rapoport NY. (2008). Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy. Ultrasonics, 48:260–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartis MS, McCallan J, Lum AF, LaBell R, Stieger SM, Matsunaga TO et al. (2006). Therapeutic effects of paclitaxel-containing ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol, 32:1771–1780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan R, Gac-Breton S, Keane R, Musila R, Sat YN, Satchi R et al. (2001). Polymer-drug conjugates, PDEPT and PELT: basic principles for design and transfer from the laboratory to clinic. J Control Release, 74:135–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Sun CZ, Lu CT, Dai DD, Lv HF, Wu Y et al. (2011). Characterization and anti-tumor activity of chemical conjugation of doxorubicin in polymeric micelles (DOX-P) in vitro. Cancer Lett, 311:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Marinov M, Arcaro A. (2007). Targeting receptor tyrosine kinase signalling in small cell lung cancer (SCLC): what have we learned so far? Cancer Treat Rev, 33:391–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess WH, Maciag T. (1989). The heparin-binding (fibroblast) growth factor family of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem, 58:575–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klagsbrun M. (1989). The fibroblast growth factor family: structural and biological properties. Prog Growth Factor Res, 1:207–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terada T, Mizobata M, Kawakami S, Yabe Y, Yamashita F, Hashida M. (2006). Basic fibroblast growth factor-binding peptide as a novel targeting ligand of drug carrier to tumor cells. J Drug Target, 14:536–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada T, Mizobata M, Kawakami S, Yamashita F, Hashida M. (2007). Optimization of tumor-selective targeting by basic fibroblast growth factor-binding peptide grafted PEGylated liposomes. J Controlled Release, 119(3):262–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhlen P, Stein S, Dairman W, Udenfriend S. (1973). Fluorometric assay of proteins in the nanogram range. Arch Biochem Biophys, 155:213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Luo YK, Zhang Y, Mei XG, Tang J. (2005). Property and contrast-enhancement effects of lipid ultrasound contrast agent: a preliminary experimental study. Ultrasound Med Biol, 31(4):537–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Luo YK, Liang HD, Mei XG, Tang J, Lu CT et al. (2006). Comparing transfection efficiency and safety for antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide between phospholipids-based microbubbles and liposomes. J Drug Target, 14:687–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao S, Thrall BD, Miller DL. (1997). Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol, 23:953–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Quddus J. (2000). Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol, 26(4):661–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayman AA, Coppage ML, Vaidya S, Miller MW. (1999). Transient poration and cell surface receptor removal from human lymphocytes in vitro by 1MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol, 25(6):999–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Dou CY. (2004). Membrane damage thresholds for pulsed or continuous ultrasound in phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol, 30(7):405–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Luo YK, Lu CT, Xu JF, Tang J, Zhang M et al. (2008). Phospholipids-based microbubbles pore sonoporation size and reseal of cell membrane cultured in vitro. J Drug Target, 16(1):18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price RJ, Skyba DM, Kaul S, Skalak TC. (1998). Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. Circulation, 98:1264–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancraeynest D, Havaux X, Pouleur AC, Pasquet A, Gerber B, Beauloye C et al. (2006). Myocardial delivery of colloid nanoparticles using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. Eur Heart J, 27:237–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar