Formulation, in vitro evaluation and study of variables on tri-layered gastro-retentive delivery system of diltiazem HCl

References

• Sungthongjeen S, Sriamornsak P, Puttipipatkhachorn P. Design and evaluation of floating multi-layer coated tablets based on gas formation. Euro J Pharm Biopharm 2008;69:255–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouge N, Buri P, Doelker E. Drug absorption sites in the gastrointestinal tract and dosage forms for site-specific delivery. Int J Pharm 1996;136:117–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munday DL. Film coated pellets containing verapamil hydrochloride: enhanced dissolution into neutral medium. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003;29:575–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seta Y, Higuchi F, Kawahara Y, et al. Design and preparation of captopril sustained-release dosage forms and their biopharmaceutical properties. Int J Pharm 1988;41:245–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh NH, Ambale SM, Ramesh B, Deshpande KB. An overview on limitationsof gastroretentive drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 2011;8:133–9
   Google Scholar
• Conte U, Maggi L, Colombo P, La Manna A. Multi-layered hydrophilic matrices as constant release devices (Geomatrix™ Systems). J Control Rel 1993;26:39–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beverly A, Britt BA. Diltiazem: a review. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32:30–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maggi L, Bruni R, Conte U. High molecular weight Polyethylene oxides (PEOs) as alternative to HPMC in controlled release dosage forms. Int J Pharm 2000;195:229–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irene N, Sashikant K. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of rosiglitazone maleate bi layered bioadhesive floating tablets. J Chem Pharm Res 2011;3:140–9
   Google Scholar
• Escudero JJ, Ferrero C, Casas M, Jimenez-Castellanos MR. Compaction properties, drug release kinetics and fronts movement studies of matrices combining mixtures of swellable and inert polymers. III: effect of polymer substitution type. Int J Pharm 2012;434:215–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawan S, Varma M, Sinha VR. High molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide)-based drug delivery systems. Part I: hydrogels and hydrophilic matrix systems. Pharm Tech 2005;9:72–80
   Google Scholar
• Costa P, Lobo JMS. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Euro J Pharm Sci 2001;13:123–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibaldi M, Feldman S. Establishment of sink conditions in dissolution rate determinations – theoretical considerations and application to nondisintegrating dosage forms. J Pharm Sci 1967;56:1238–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963;52:1145–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixson AW, Crowell JH. Dependence of reaction velocity upon surface and agitation: I – theoretical consideration. Ind Eng Chem 1931;23:923–31
   Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer RW, Guny R, Doelker E, et al. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 1983;15:25–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streubel A, Siepmann J, Peppas NA, Bodmeier R. Bimodal drug release achieved with multi-layer matrix tablets: transport mechanisms and device design. J Control Rel 2000;69:455–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi L, Segale L, Torre ML, et al. Dissolution behaviour of hydrophilic matrix tablets containing two different polyethylene oxides (PEOs) for the controlled release of a water-soluble drug: dimensionality study. Biomaterials 2002;23:1113–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu N, Wang L, Tan DCW, et al. Mathematical modeling and in vitro study of controlled drug release via a highly swellable and dissoluble polymer matrix: polyethylene oxide with high molecular weights. J Control Rel 2005;102:569–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda M, Peppas NA, McGinity JW. Floating hot-melt extruded tablets for gastroretentive controlled drug release system. J Control Rel 2006;115:121–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Sánchez PE, Hernandez-Leon A, Villafuerte-Robles L. Effect of sodium bicarbonate on the properties of metronidazole floating matrix tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2008;34:171–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sungthongjeen S, Paeratakul O, Limmatvapirat S, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of a multiple-unit floating drug delivery system based on gas formation technique. Int J Pharm 2006;324:136–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha Roy D, Rohera BD. Comparative evaluation of rate of hydration and matrix erosion of HEC and HPC and study of drug release from their matrices. Euro J Pharm Sci 2002;16:193–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergnaud JM. Liquid transport controlled release processes in polymeric materials: applications to oral dosage forms. Int J Pharm 1993;90:89–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebube NK, Hikal AH, Wyandt CM, et al. Sustained release of acetaminophen from heterogeneous matrix tablets: influence of polymer ratio, polymer loading, and co-active on drug release. Pharm Dev Tech 1997;2:161–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timmermans J, Moes AJ. How well do floating dosage forms float? Int J Pharm 1990;62:207–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Lin S, Daggy BP, et al. Effect of formulation variables on the floating properties of gastric floating drug delivery system. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2002;28:783–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Lin S, Chien YW, et al. Statistical optimization of gastric floating system for oral controlled delivery of calcium. AAPS PharmSciTech 2001;2:1–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma N, Xu L, Wang Q, et al. Development and evaluation of new sustained-release floating microspheres. Int J Pharm 2008;358:82–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strübing S, Metz H, Mäder K. Characterization of poly(vinyl acetate) based floating matrix tablets. J Control Rel 2008;126:149–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead L, Fell JT, Collett JH, et al. Floating dosage forms: an in vivo study demonstrating prolonged gastric retention. J Control Rel 1998;55:3–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonaegui MT, Barria JL, Thielemann AM, et al. In vitro conditions for the study of the in vivo performance of sustained-release theophylline matrix tablets administered in fasted conditions and with a high-fat diet. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25:1199–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi T, Kanbe H, Okada M, et al. In vitro and in vivo sustained-release characteristics of theophylline matrix tablets and novel cluster tablets. Int J Pharm 2007;341:105–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim A. Effects of food on the bioavailability of theophylline from controlled- release products in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78:695–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinno J, Kamada N, Miyake M, et al. In vitro–in vivo correlation for wet-milled tablet of poorly water-soluble cilostazol. J Control Rel 2003;130:29–37
   Google Scholar
• Mundargi RC, Patil SA, Aminabhavi TM. Evaluation of acrylamide-grafted-xanthan gum copolymer matrix tablets for oral controlled delivery of antihypertensive drugs. Carb Polymers 2007;69:130–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinten T, De Beer T, Vervaet C, Remon JP. Evaluation of injection moulding as a pharmaceutical technology to produce matrix tablets. Euro J Pharm and Biopharm 2009;71:145–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankalia JM, Sankalia MG, Mashru RC. Drug release and swelling kinetics of directly compressed glipizide sustained-release matrices: establishment of level A IVIVC. J Control Rel 2008;129:49–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar