Differential Sensitivity to Airpuffs on Human Hairy and Glabrous Skin

References

• Babkoff H. Electrocutaneous input‐output functions: Magnitude estimation and reaction time. Int. J. Neurosci. 1977; 7: 73–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers Y. Theory of Error. Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA 1957
   Google Scholar
• Burgess P. R., Howe J. F., Lessler M. J., Whitehorn D. Cutaneous receptors supplied by myelinated fibers in the cat: II. Number of mechanoreceptors excited by a local stimulus. J. Neurophysiol. 1974; 37: 1373–1386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholewiak R. W. Spatial factors in the perceived intensity of vibrotactile patterns. Sens. Proc. 1980; 3: 141–156
   Google Scholar
• Craig J. C. Vibrotactile loudness addition. Percept. Psychophys. 1966; 1: 185–190
   Google Scholar
• Darian‐Smith I., Kenins P. Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1980; 509: 147–155
   Google Scholar
• Franzen O. On spatial summation in the tactual sense. Scand. J. Psychol. 1969; 10: 193–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner E. P., Costanzo R. M. Spatial integration of multiple‐point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1980a; 43: 420–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner E. P., Costanzo R. M. Temporal integration of multiple‐point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1980b; 43: 444–468
   Google Scholar
• Gardner E. P., Spencer W. A. Sensory funneling: I. Psychophysical observations of human subjects and responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents in the cat to patterned skin stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 1972a; 35: 925–953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner E. P., Spencer W. A. Sensory funneling: II. Cortical neuronal representation of patterned cutaneous stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 1972b; 35: 954–977
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner E. P., Tast J. M. Psychophysical measurements of perceived intensity of single‐point and multiple‐point cutaneous stimuli in humans and subhuman primates. J. Neurophysiol. 1981; 46: 479–495
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gescheider G. A., Wright J. H., Evans M. B. Reaction time in the detection of vibrotactile signals. J. Exp. Psychol. 1968; 77: 501–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gescheider G. A., Wright J. H., Weber B. J., Kirchner B. M., Milligan E. A. Reaction time as a function of the intensity and probability of occurence of vibrotactile signals. Percept. Psychophys. 1969; 5: 18–20
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinger M. D., Amassian V. E. Response of forelimb guard hair afferent units to air‐jet stimulation of entire receptive field. J. Neurophysiol. 1980; 44: 979–1001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D. M., Swets J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Krieger, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Hamalainen H., Jarvilehto T. Peripheral neural basis of tactile sensations in man: I. Effect of frequency and probe area on sensations elicited by single mechanical pulses on hairy and glabrous skin of the hand. Brain Res. 1981; 279: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Hamalainen H., Warren S., Gardner E. P. Airpuff detectability on hairy and glabrous skin. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 1984; 10: 108
   Google Scholar
• Harrington T., Merzenich M. M. Neural coding in the sense of touch: Human sensations of skin indentation compared with the responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 1970; 10: 251–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel H., Boman K. K. A. Afferent impulses in cutaneous sensory nerves in human subjects. J. Neurophysiol. 1960; 23: 564–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvilehto T., Hamalainen H., Laurinen P. Characteristics of single mechanoreceptive fibres innervating hairy skin of the human hand. Exp. Brain Res. 1976; 25: 45–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvilehto T., Hamalainen H., Soininen K. Peripheral neural basis of tactile sensations in man: II. Characteristics of human mechanoreceptors in the hairy skin and correlations of their activity with tactile sensations. Brain Res. 1981; 219: 13–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: Relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1979a; 286: 283–300
   Google Scholar
• Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. Detection of tactile stimuli: Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1979b; 297: 405–422
   Google Scholar
• Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B., Westling G. Thresholds of mechanosensitive afferents in the human hand as measured with von Frey hairs. Brain Res. 1980; 784: 343–351
   Google Scholar
• Johnson K. O. Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 1974; 37: 48–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knibestol M., Vallbo A. B. Stimulus‐response functions of primary afferents and psychophysical intensity estimation on mechanical skin stimulation in the human hand. Sensory Functions of the Skin in Primates, Y. Zotterman. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1976; 201–230
   Google Scholar
• McKenna T. M., Whitsel B. L., Dreyer D. A. Anterior parietal cortical topographic organization in macaque monkey: A reevaluation. J. Neurophysiol. 1982; 45: 289–317
   Google Scholar
• Merzenich M. M., Harrington T. The sense of flutter‐vibration evoked by stimulation of the hairy skin of primates: Comparison of human sensory capacity with the responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 1969; 9: 236–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merzenich M. M., Kaas J. H., Sur M., Lin C. ‐S. Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic areas 3b and 1 in “SI” in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). J. Comp. Neurol. 1978; 181: 41–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody D. B. Reaction time as an index of sensory function. Animal Psychophysics: The Design and Conduct of Sensory Experiments, W. C. Stebbins. Appleton‐Cen‐tury‐Crofts, New York 1970; 277–302
   Google Scholar
• Moore T. J. A survey of the mechanical characteristics of skin and tissue in response to vibratory stimulation. IEEE Trans. Man‐Machine Syst. 1970; 11: 79–84
   Google Scholar
• Mountcastle V. B. The problem of sensing and the neural coding of sensory events. The Neurosciences: A Study Program, G. C. Quarton, T. Melnechuk, F. O. Schmitt. Rockefeller University Press, New York 1967; 393–407
   Google Scholar
• Mountcastle V., Talbot B. W. H., Kornhuber H. H. The neural transformation of mechanical stimuli delivered to the monkey's hand. Ciba Foundation Symposium: Touch, Heat and Pain, A. V.S. de Reuck, J. Knight. Little, Brown, Boston 1966; 325–374
   Google Scholar
• Nelson R. J., Sur M., Felleman D. J., Kaas J. H. Representations of the body surface in postcentral parietal cortex of Macaca fascicularis. J. Comp. Neurol. 1980; 792: 611–643
   Google Scholar
• Phillips J. R., Johnson K. O. Tactile spatial resolution: III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges and gratings. J. Neurophysiol. 1981; 46: 1204–1225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pubols B. H., Jr. Factors affecting cutaneous mechanoreceptor response: I. Constant‐force versus constant‐displacement stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 1982; 47: 515–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins W. C., Miller J. Reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity for the monkey. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1964; 7: 309–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sur M., Merzenich M., Kaas J. H. Magnification, receptive‐field area, and “hypercolumn” size in areas 3b and I of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1980; 44: 295–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot W. H., Darian‐Smith I., Kornhuber H. H., Mountcastle V. B. The sense of flutter‐vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J. Neurophysiol. 1968; 31: 301–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torebjork H. E., Ochoa J. L. Specific sensations evoked by activity in single identified sensory units in man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1980; 110: 445–447
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuckett R. P., Horch K. W., Burgess P. R. Response of cutaneous hair and field mechanoreceptors in cat to threshold stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 1978; 41: 138–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallbo A. B. Sensations evoked from the glabrous skin of the human hand by electrical stimulation of unitary mechanosensitive afferents. Brain Res. 1981; 215: 359–363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallbo A. B., Johansson R. S. The tactile sensory innervation of the glabrous skin of the human hand. Active Touch, G. Gordon. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1978; 29–54
   Google Scholar
• Verrillo R. T. Vibrotactile thresholds for hairy skin. J. Exp. Psychol. 1966; 72: 47–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verrillo R. T. A duplex theory of mecha‐noreception. The Skin Senses, D. R. Kenshalo. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL 1968; 139–159
   Google Scholar
• von Bekesy G. Experiments in Hearing. McGraw‐Hill, New York 1960
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. The Skin Senses, D. R. Kenshalo. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL 1968; 195–222
   Google Scholar