Analyzing and Critiquing Occupational Therapy Practice Models Using Mosey's Extrapolation Method

REFERENCES

• Allen, C. K. (2000). Allen cognitive level screen (ACLS): Test manual. Colchester, CT: S & S Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625–688.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bushnell, J. (1999). A contrary view of the technical writing classroom: Notes toward future discussion. Technical Communication Quarterly, 82), 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. B. & Tufano, R. (2008). Applied theories in occupational therapy: A practical approach. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Creek, J. (2008). The knowledge base of occupational therapy. In J. Creek and L. Lougher (Eds.), Occupational therapy & mental Health ( pp. 31–56). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• DePoy, E. & Gitlin, L. N. (2005). Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Early, M. B. (2000). Mental health concepts and techniques for the occupational therapy assistant (3rd ed.). New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. J., Velde, B. P. & Wittman, P. P. (2002). The use of theory in everyday practice: An exploratory study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 161), 45–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George, L. A., Schkade, J. & Ishee, J. H. (2004). Content validity of the relative mastery measurement scale: A measure of occupational adaptation. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 24, 92–103.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. W. & Schkade, J. K. (1997). Occupational adaptation intervention with patients with cerebrovascular accidents: A clinical study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, J. (2005). Models of practice and therapy approaches in occupational therapy. Naidex 2010. Retrieved August 8, 2009, from http://www.naidex.co.uk/page.cfm/link$=$124.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, R. (2001). Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. Edinburg, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Houser, J. (2007). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, S. (2006). Professional versus practitioner: Making the case for theory. Orange Journal, 31), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ikiugu, M. N. (2007). Psychosocial conceptual practice models in occupational therapy: Building adaptive capability. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. M. & Webber, P. B. (2004). An introduction to theory and reasoning in nursing (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner, G. (2002). UIC's scholarship of practice. OT Practice. Retrieved April 10, 2009, from http://www.aota.org/Pubs/OTP/1997-2007/Features/2002/f-011402.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner, G. (2009). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Law, M. & McColl, M. A. (1989). Knowledge and use of theory among occupational therapists: A Canadian survey. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(4), 198–204.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W., Taylor, R. & Kielhofner, G. (2009). Choice, knowledge, and utilization of a practice theory: A national study of occupational therapists who use the model of human occupation. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 23(1), 60–s71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacRae, A., Falk-Kessler, J., Julin, D., Padilla, R. & Schultz, S. (1998). Occupational therapy models. In E. Cara & A. MacRae (Eds.), Psychosocial occupational therapy: A clinical practice ( pp. 97–136). Albany, NY: Delmar.
   Google Scholar
• Mosey, A. C. (1970). Three frames of reference for mental health. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Mosey, A. C. (1996a). Applied scientific inquiry in the health professions: An epistemological orientation (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mosey, A. C. (1996b). Psychosocial components of occupational therapy. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, K. L. & Sanderson, S. N. (1999). Concepts of occupational therapy (4th ed.). New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Schkade, J. & Schultz, S. (1992). Occupational adaptation: Toward a holistic approach to contemporary practice, Part 1. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 829–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, S. (2003, September). Psychosocial occupational therapy in schools. OT Practice, 8, CE1–CE8.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, S. & Schkade, J. (1992). Occupational adaptation: Toward a holistic approach to contemporary practice, Part 2. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 917–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard, J. W. & Lasorsa, D. L. (2003). How to build social science theories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smiragliat, R. P. (2001). Further progress towards theory in knowledge organization. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 232/3), 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, S., Thompson-Franson, T. & Kramer, C. (2002). Linking concepts to a process for working with clients. In E. Townsend (Ed.), Enabling occupation: An occupational perspective ( pp. 57–94). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, F. & Cutler, S. K. (2002). Psychosocial occupational therapy: A holistic approach (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: Delmar.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, B. A. & Eskow, K. G. (1996). Theory application by school-based occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 508), 662–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (2002). Introduction. In E. Townsend (Ed.), Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
   Google Scholar