Implementing Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Inclusive Educational Settings: A Case Study

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Position statement. [Position Statement]. Available from www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. H., Kokoska, S. M., Jones, S. D. (1996). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. L., Parette, H. P., Jr., Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., Carroll, K. (2006). Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. L., Stoner, J., Parette, H. P., Angell, M. E. (2006). AAC team perceptions: Augmentative and alternative communication device use. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(2), 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausch, M. E., Ault, M. J. (2008). Assistive technology implementation plan: A tool for improving outcomes. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(1), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bausch, M. E., Ault, M. J., Evmenova, A. S., Behrmann, M. M. (2008). Going beyond AT devices: Are AT services being considered? Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., Williams, M., Wilkins, D. (2007). Key principles underlying AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. ( pp. 509–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, B. J. (2000). Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: Keys to in-classroom speech-language services. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 219–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, L., Hunt, P., Soto, G. (2002). Self-efficacy and the inclusion of students with AAC needs, October 1998-Setember 2001, final project report. ED475320 http://www.mlb.ilstu.edu/cgibin/redirect.cgi?http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED475320&loginpage=Login.asp&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. B. (1997). Culturally inclusive assessments for children using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19, 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J. (2004). Collaborative teaming to support preschoolers with severe disabilities who are placed in general education early childhood programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24(3), 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Doering, K. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69(3), 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Liboiron, N., Bae, S. (2004). Collaborative teaming to support preschoolers with severe disabilities who are placed in general education early childhood programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24(3), 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act Amendments. (2004). 20 U.S.C. 1400, Public Law 108–446, 108th Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). “Communication is the essence of human life”: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, P., Mirenda, P. (1992). Roles and responsibilities of special education teachers serving on teams delivering AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 200–214.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Bendek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M., Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning to use AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Markova, I., Collins, S., Moodie, E. (1996). AAC systems: Obstacles to effective use. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 31, 31–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). 20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq. Public Law 107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., Brotherson, M. J., Huer, M. B., (2000). Giving families a voice in AAC decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 23, 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., Huer, M. B., Brotherson, M. J. (2001). Related service personnel perceptions of team AAC decision-making across cultures. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., Marr, D. D. (1997). Assisting children and families who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices: Best practices for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette, P., VanBiervliet, A., Hourcade, J. J. (2000). Family-centered decision making in assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15, 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Prelock, P. A. (2000). Multiple perspectives for determining the roles of speech-language pathologists in inclusionary classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2002). NVivo. [Computer software]. Bundoora Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A. (1995). Adult partner-augmented communication input to youth with mental retardation using the system for augmenting language (SAL). Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 902–913.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson, K. O., Beukelman, D. R., Sharpe, T. (2000). An elementary student with severe expressive communication impairment in a general education classroom: Sequential analysis of interactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Son, S., Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M., Lancioni, G. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communications systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 389–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt, P., Goetz, L. (2001a). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(1), 51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt, P., Goetz, L. (2001b). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman, I. J., Karasinski, L., Guillory, B. (2008). The use of conversational repairs by African American preschoolers. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 461–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, M. L. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D. (2008). “Reach for the stars”: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 194–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar