Navigation of a Dynamic Screen AAC Interface by Survivors of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association [ASHA] (2005). Roles of speech language pathologists in identification, diagnosis, and treatment of individuals with cognitive communication disorders: Position statement. ASHA Supplement, 25, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Body, R., & Perkins, M. R. (2004). Validation of linguistic analyses in narrative discourse after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 707–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R., Beukelman, D., & Hux, K. (2004). TBI survivor's accuracy, efficiency, and preferences using three organization strategies to retrieve words. Brain Injury, 18, 497–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, T. (1999). Early understanding and production of graphic symbols. Child Development, 70, 1314–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L., Balandin, S., & Togher, L. (2002). AAC use by people with traumatic brain injury: Issues and solutions. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 4, 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. B., Sparks, G., Levin, H. S., Dennis, M., Roncadin, C., Zhang, L., & Song, J. (2004). Discourse macrolevel processing after severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 37–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13, 181–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., DeRuyter, F., & Stein, M. (1996). Treatment efficacy: Cognitive-communicative disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury in adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, S5–S17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 223–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demasco, P. (1994). Human factors considerations in the design of language interfaces in AAC. Assistive Technology, 6, 10–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietz, A., McKelvey, M., & Beukelman, D. R. (2006). Visual scene displays (VSD): New AAC interfaces for persons with aphasia. Perspectives in AAC, 15, 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., Kennedy, M., Jausalaitis, G., & Phillips, B. (2000). AAC and traumatic brain injury. In D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurological disorders. (pp. 271–304). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Fager, S., Doyle, M., & Karantounis, R. (2007). AAC intervention for progressive conditions: Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease and Huntington's Disease. In D. Beukelman, K. Garrett, & K. Yorkston, (Eds.), Augmentative communication strategies for adults with acute or chronic medical conditions. (pp. 317–346). Baltimore, MDPaul H. Brookes
   Google Scholar
• Fager, S., Hux, K., Beukelman, D., & Karantounis, R. (2006). Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuny, L. A., Briggs, M., Newcombe, F., Ratcliff, G., & Thomas, C. (1980). Measuring the duration of post-traumatic amnesia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 43, 377–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & Doyle, M. (1992). Language representation for the augmentative and alternative communication of adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7(3), 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, C. (2000, February). Rancho-Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning-Revised. Presented at TBI Rehabilitation Managed Care Environment: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Rehabilitation. San Antonio, TX: Continuing Education Programs of America.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. (2001). CLQT: Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, S., & Hallowell, B. (2007). An evaluation of test images for multiple-choice comprehension assessment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 21, 883–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Beukelman, D. R., Dombrovskis, M., & Snyder, R. (1993). Semantic organization following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hux, K., & Manasse, N. (2003). Assessment and treatment of cognitive-communication impairments. In K. Hux (Ed.), Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury(pp. 93–133). Austin, TX: ProEd.
   Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Wallace, S., Evans, K., & Snell, J. (2008). Performing “cookie theft” content analyses to delineate cognitive-communication impairments. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). The Western Aphasia Battery-Revised [WAB-R]. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S., & Riffe, D. (1996). Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories: Sins of omission and commission in mass communication quantitative research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 969–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladtkow, M. (1993). Traumatic brain injury and severe expressive communication impairment: The role of augmentative communication. Seminars in Speech and Language, 14, 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, B. (2007). The application of ICF in cognitive-communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 334–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G.R. (1984). Non-speech communication symbols and systems: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 28, 3–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loftus, G.R., & Loftus, E.F. (1982). Essence of statistics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M., Hux, K., Dietz, A., & Beukelman, D. (2010). Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on comprehension by people with chronic aphasia. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 19, 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1993). Graphic representational systems and literacy learning. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Mathy-Laikko, P. (1989). Augmentative and alternative communication applications for persons with severe congenital communication disorders: An introduction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M., & Riechle, J. (1989). Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectually handicapped adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 627–633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Schweigert P. (2003). Cognitive skills and AAC: Where we've been, what we know and the questions we should ask. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC. (pp. 241–275). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Scheid, R., Walther, K., Guthke, T., Preul, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Cognitive sequelae of diffuse axonal injury. Archives of Neurology, 63, 418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Presley, S. (2007, March). AAC intervention for adults. Paper presented at the Texas Speech-Language-Hearing Association annual convention, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G.S., & Robertson, G.J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test-Fourth Edition. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar