An Activity Systemic Approach to Augmentative and Alternative Communication

References

• Allwood, J. (2000a). An activity based approach to pragmaticsAbduction, belief and context in dialogue: Studies in computational pragmatics. In H. Bunt & B. Black (Eds.), 47–80 Amsterdam: John Benjamin's.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J. (red.) (2000b). Talspråksfrekvenser. In Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics GPTL S 21Gothenburg: Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J. (2001). Capturing differences between social activities in spoken language. In Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse: A festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, 4(2), 301.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1998). Topics of meal-break conversations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J., Hoag, L., & McCoy, K. (2003). Relevance and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 800–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D.R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needsBaltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S.W., & Hunt-Berg, M. (2003). Social networks: A communication inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partnersMonterey, CA: Augmentative Communication, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., Williams, M., & Wilkins, D. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dark, L., & Balandin, S. (2007). Prediction and selection of vocabulary for two leisure activities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 288–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, R., Alm, N., Arnott, J.L., Harper, G., & Morrison, A. (1998). A script-based AAC system for transactional interaction. Natural Language Engineering, 4, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifactsMahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental researchHelsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at workCambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perceptionNew York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliksen, J., & Göransson, B. (2002). Användarcentrerad systemdesign - en process med fokus på användare och användbarhetLund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hedvall, P.O. (2009). The activity diamond – Modeling an enhanced accessibility (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Moulton, B., Lesher, G., Wilkins, D., & Cornish, J. (2000). Frametalker: Development of a frame-based communication systemCSUN 2000, California State University, Northridge.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D., Shane, H., Russel, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 243–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, L., Bedrosian, J., McCoy, K., & Johnson, D. (2008). Hierarchy of conversational rule violations involving utterance-based augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunnicutt, S., & Carlberger, J. (2001). Improving word prediction using Markov models and heuristic methods. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B.A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction designCambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, D.K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodologyThousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personalityEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mindMoscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S.C. (1983). PragmaticsCambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, J., Todman, J., File, P., & Coles, E. (2004). Making contact in the workplace. Communication Matters, 18(1), 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, K., Bedrosian, J., Hoag, L., & Johnson, D. (2007). Brevity and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 76–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Nelson Bryen, D. (2007). AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechling, L., & Cronin, B. (2006). Computer-based video instruction to teach the use of augmentative and alternative communication devices for ordering at fast-food restaurants. The Journal of Special Education, 39(4), 234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mey, J.L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introductionOxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K.A. (2002). The content analysis guidebookThousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. (1988). The psychology of everyday thingsNew York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J.R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todman, J., Alm, N., Higginbotham, J., & File, P. (2008). Whole utterance approaches in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 235–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todman, J., & Alm, N. (2003). Modelling conversational pragmatics in communication aids. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 523–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processesCambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and languageCambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar