A Qualitative Analysis of Email Interactions of Children who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

References

• Anderberg, P. (2006). FACE - Disabled people, technology and internetLund, Sverige: Certec, Lunds Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., O'Ridordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). Test for reception of grammar: ManualManchester: Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre. Swedish translation by Holmberg, E.Lundälv, E., E. & , E. (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, N., & Poppen, W. (2003). Assistive technology, computers and Internet may decrease sense of isolation for homebound elderly and disabled persons. Technology and Disability, 15,19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using languageCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, K., & Light, J. (2000). Use of electronic communication to develop mentor-protégé relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: Pilot study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, L. O., & Fallsberg, M. (1991). Phenomenology as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 8, 150–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ferm, U. (2006). Using language in social activities at home: A study of interaction between caregivers and children with and without disabilities. Doctoral dissertationGöteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. (1932). Children's spontaneous writing. Peabody Journal of Education, 10, 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Gandell, T., & Sutton, A. (1998). Comparison of AAC interaction patterns in face-to-face and telecommunications conversations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Grinter, R-E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life, CSCW'02, 16–20 November, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, N., Robinson, A., & Crawford, L. (2000). Young children's explorations of letter writing. In Letter writing as a social practice D. Barton (Ed.), 131–149. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins North America.
   Google Scholar
• Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feeling by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, E., & Lundälv, E. (1998). T.R.O.G. svensk manual [Swedish manual] Sweden, Gothenburg: SIT Läromedel.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, T., Hargreaves, L., & Comber, C. (1997). An evaluation of the role of email in promoting science investigative skills in primary rural schools in England. Research in Science Education, 27, 223–236.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, B. (1996). Datorns attraktionskraft [The computer's attractiveness] CERTEC rapport 7:96. Retrieved 23 October 2009 from: http://www.certec.lth.se/dok/datornsattraktionskraft.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewingLondon, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. (1993). On quality in qualitative studies. Nordisk pedagogik, 13, 194–211.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I- discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Arnold, K., & Clark, E. A. (2003). Finding a place in the “social circle of life”: The development of sociorelational competence by individuals who use AAC. In Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice J. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), 361–397. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Linnér, M., & Linnér, B. (1992). Gleder meg til svar – Elever i Norden skriver till varandra. [Nice to hear from you – Pupils in Scandinavia writes to each other]Helsingborg, Sweden: Schmidt Boktryckeri.
   Google Scholar
• Mavers, D. (2007). Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child's email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7, 155–176.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Movellan J., & Sjenowski, T. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325, 284–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, G. (2003). E-mail me your thoughts: Digital communication and narrative writing. Reading, 37, 104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, G. (2005). Digikids: Cool dudes and the new writing. E-learning, 2(1), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, D., & Nicolle, C. (2004). Making Internet accessible for people with cognitive and communication impairment. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3, 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (1965). Guide to using the coloured progressive matricesLondon, UK: H.K. Lewis & Co:
   Google Scholar
• Sabbadini, M., Bonanni, R., Carlesimo, G. A., & Caltogirone C. (2001). Neuropsychological assessment of patients with severe neuromotor and verbal disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 169–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shpigelman, C. N., Weiss, P. L., & Reiter, S. (2009). E-mentoring for all. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 919–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skär. L., & Tamm, M. (2002). Disability and social network. A comparison between children and adolescents with and without restricted mobility. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 4, 118–136.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, P., & Siders, J. A. (2001). E-pal writing. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniquesThousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., & Rönnberg, J. (2010). Advanced theory of mind in children using augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Communication Disorders Quarterly, 31, 86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meij, H., & Boersma, K. (2002). Email use in elementary school: An analysis of exchange patterns and content. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, M. H. (1996). Introduction. In Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), 1–18. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Quan Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does Internet increase, decrease or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitments. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar