The ComAlong Communication Boards: Parents' Use and Experiences of Aided Language Stimulation

References

• Allwood, J. (2000). An activity based approach to pragmatics. In H. Bunt & B.Black (Eds.), Abduction, belief and context in dialogue: Studies in computational pragmatics (pp. 47–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D., Jones, S., & Kokoska, S. (1995). Family perspectives on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Stoner, J. B., & Dennis, M. L. (2009). An investigation of aided language stimulation: Does it increase AAC use with adults with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 42–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (1994). The Picture Exchange Communication System. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, D., & Demchak, M. (2009). The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 274–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, C. E., Day, D., Ferm, U., Hougaard, A. R., Hougaard, G. R., & Thunberg, G. (2011). Treating the actions of children as sensible investigating structures in interactions between children with disabilities and their parents. Accepted for publication in Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J., & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during aweeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 300–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Granlund, M., & Alant, E. (2007). A discussion of individual variability, in activity-based interventions, using the niche concept. Child Care Health & Development, 33, 424–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drager, K., Postal. V., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in two preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, K., Light, J., & Achenbach, A. (2003). The semanticorganization patterns of young children: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ferm, U., Ahlsén, E., & Björck-Åkesson, E. (2005). Conversational topics between a child with complex communication needs and her caregiver at mealtime. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 19–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens, C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., Björck-Åkesson, E., Wilder, J., & Ylvén, R. (2008). AAC interventions for children in a family environment: Implementing evidence in practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspan, S. I., & Wieder, S. (2006). Infant and early childhood mental health. A comprehensive developmental approach to assessment and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., & Walker, M. (1990). The Makaton vocabulary: Using manual signs and graphic symbols to develop interpersonal communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). Communication is the essence of human life: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., McCarthy, J., Mellott, S., Millar, D., Parrish, C., Parsons, A., et al. (2004). Performance of typically developing four- and five-year-old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M. B., & Light, J. (2008). “Achild needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson (1981–2011). Boardmaker [Software]. Mayer-Johnson LLC. Solana Beach: CA.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson (1981–2011). The Picture Communication Symbols. Mayer-Johnson LLC. Solana Beach: CA.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1997). Facilitating transitions in language development for children using AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (2007). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence. Assessment and intervention. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, J., & Weitzman, E. (2004). It takes two to talk. Toronto: The Hanen Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, G. (2003, October). A pragmatic approach to the organisation of vocabulary in dynamic displays. Paper presented at the Swedish Handicap Institute's conference ID-dagarna, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Pring, T. (2005). Research methods in communication disorders. London and Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, G. (2003). The development of communication with alternative means from Vygotsky's cultural-historical perspective. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication developmental issues (pp. 67–82). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R., Adamson, L., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 350–364.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Effects of AAC on natural speech development. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 404–425). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M.A. (2002). The role of language comprehension in establishing early augmented conversations. In J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman., & J. C. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 453–474). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, E.B., & Cress, C.J. (2002). Overview of the emergence of early AAC behaviors. In J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman., & J. C. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices forbeginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp.25–57). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2003). Environmental influences on aided language development: The role of partner adaptation. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication developmental issues (pp. 155–175). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Thunberg, G. (2007). Using speech-generating devices at home. A study of children with autism spectrum disorders at different stages of communication development. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 34. Gothenburg, Sweden: The University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Thunberg, G., Ahlsén, E., & Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (2007). Autistic spectrum disorders and speech-generating devices: Communication in different activities at home. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 457–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Schribner, E. Souberman (Eds.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widgit Software (1994–2011). Widgitsymbols. Widgit Software Ltd. Cubbington: UK.
   Google Scholar
• Widgit Software (2004–2011). Communicate: In Print [Software]. Widgit Software Ltd. Cubbington: UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., Carlin, M., & Thistle, J. (2008). The role of color cues in facilitating accurate and rapid location of aided symbols by children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 179–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar