The Speech-Generating Device (SGD) Mentoring Program: Training Adults who use an SGD to Mentor

References

• Ballin, L., Balandin, S., & Stancliffe, R. (in press). The speech generating device mentoring program: An evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ballin, L., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R., & Togher, L. (2011). Speech-language pathologists’ views on mentoring by people who use speech generating devices. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(5), 446–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballin, L., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R., & Togher, L. (2012). The views of people who use speech generating devices on mentoring new learners. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7, 63–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 160–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britner, P. A., Balcazar, F. E., Blechman, E. A., Blinn-Pike, L., & Larose, S. (2006). Mentoring special youth populations. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 747–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, K. J., & Light, J. C. (2000). Use of electronic communication to develop mentor-protege relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: Pilot study. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. M., & Carlisle, M. (1988). (PACT) Partners in augmentative communication training: A resource guide for interaction facilitation training for children. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D. R., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gaglian, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 518–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, M. E. (1986). Language intervention with young children. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fey, M. E., Long, S. H., & Finestack, L. H. (2003). Ten principles of grammar facilitation for children with specific language impairments. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Hockenberger, E. H. (1991). Significant progress in child language intervention: An 11-year retrospective. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 401–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvey, M. T., May, M. E., & Kennedy, C. H. (2004). Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and the evaluation of educational systems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 267–276.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, K., & Romich, B. (2001). A language activity monitor for supporting AAC evidence-based clinical practice. Assistive Technology, 13, 12–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, S. (2007). Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disability and Society, 22, 457–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 505–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., McNaughton, D., Krezman, C., Williams, M., Gulens, M., Galskoy, A.,& Umpleby, M. (2007). The AAC Mentor Project: Web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 56–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (2011). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–536.
   Google Scholar
• McConachie, H., & Pennington, L. (1997). In-service training for schools on augmentative and alternative communication. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 277–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M., & Light, J. (2008). ‘A child needs to be given a chance to succeed’: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L., & Kearns, K. (1983). Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, J., & McCusker, C. (2008). Common psychological problems in cerebral palsy. Paediatrics and Child Health, 18, 427–431.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, L., Goldbart, J., & Marshall, J. (2004). Interaction training for conversational partners of children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 151–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, L. E., Sowers, J., & Stevens, T. (1995). An exploratory, randomized study of the impact of mentoring on the self-efficacy and community-based knowledge of adolescents with severe physical challenges. Journal of Rehabilitation, 61(1), 33.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, L. E., Turner, A., Ellison, R., Matuszewski, J., Wilson, R., Phillips, A., & Rein, C. (2001). A multi-component intervention to promote adolescent self-determination. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67(4), 13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentke Romich Company (2010). PASS Demo Software. Retrieved from http://www.prentrom.com/downloads/pass.
   Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M. B., & D’Silva, K. (2005). ‘When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff’: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. E. (1994). Older and wiser: Mentoring relationships in childhood and adolescence. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 187–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saito, R. N., & Blyth, D. A. (1992). Understanding mentoring relationships. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research methodology: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumbo, N. J., Blegen, A. R., & Lindahl-Lewis, P. (2008). Two mentorship case studies of high school and university students with disabilities: Milestones and lessons. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 74(3), 45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, M. H. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-current multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior and Experimental Psychiatry, 12, 257–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar