Eye Tracking Research to Answer Questions about Augmentative and Alternative Communication Assessment and Intervention

References

• Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources,Psychological Bulletin,91, 276–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). The pupillary system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 142–162). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Garrett, K. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired severe communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 104–121.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Garrett, K. L., & Yorkston, K. M. (Eds.). (2007). Augmentative communication strategies for adults with acute or chronic medical conditions. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. C. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., (2008). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with Down syndrome or fragile X syndrome. In J. Roberts, R. Chapman, & S. F. Warren (Eds.), Speech and language development and intervention in Down syndrome and fragile X syndrome. Communication and language intervention series (pp. 255–274). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brady. N. C., Anderson, C. J., Hahn, L. J., Obermeier, S. M., & Kapa, L. L. (2014). Eye tracking as a measure of receptive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 147–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, M. T., Soraci, S. A., Strawbridge, C., Dennis, N., Loiselle, R., & Chechile, N. A. (2003)Detection of changes in naturalistic scenes: Comparisons of individuals with and without mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108, 181–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chawarska, K., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2003). Automatic attention cuing through eye movement in 2-year old children with autism. Child Development, 74, 1108–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawarska, K., Volkmar, F., & Klin, A. (2010). Limited attentional bias for faces in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, W. V., Dickson, C., Balsamo, L., O’Donnell, K. L., Tomanari, G. Y., Farren, K. . . McIlvane, W. J. (2010). Observing behavior and atypically restricted stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 297–313.
   Google Scholar
• Dube, W. V., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2014). The potential role of “stimulus overselectivity” in AAC: information from eye-tracking and behavioral studies of attention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 172–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (2006). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th edition. American Guidance Service, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson, S., Findlay, J. M., Leekam, S. R., & Benson, V. (2008). Rapid detection of person information in a naturalistic scene. Perception, 37, 571–583.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson, S., Leekam, S. R., Benson, V., Frank, M. C. & Findlay, J. M. (2009). Eye-movements reveal attention to social information in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 47, 248–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, K., & Lasker, J. (2013). Adults with severe aphasia and apraxia of speech. In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (pp. 405–446). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie-Smith, K., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2014). Designing AAC systems for children with autism: Evidence from eye tracking research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliga, T., Elsabbagh, M., Andravizou, A., & Johnson, M. (2009). Faces attract infants’ attention in complex displays. Infancy, 14, 550–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, S., & Hallowell, B. (2007). An evaluation of multiple-choice test images for comprehension assessment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 21, 883–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, N., Metzger, A., Magne, R., Bonnet-Brilhault, F., Roux, S., Barthelemy, C., & Martineau, J. (2008). Exploration of core features of a human face by healthy and autistic adults analyzed by visual scanning. Neuropsychology, 12, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, N., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye-tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornof, A., & Halverson, T. (2002). Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 592–604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ivanova, M. V., & Hallowell, B. (2012). Validity of an eye-tracking method to index working memory in people with and without aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 556–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech-language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karetekin, C. (2007). Eye-tracking studies of normative and atypical development. Developmental Review, 27, 283–348.
   Google Scholar
• Kumin, L. (2006). Speech intelligibility and childhood verbal apraxia in children with Down syndrome. Down syndrome Research and Practice, 10, 10–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manor, B. R., & Gordon, E., (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128, 85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. E., Klusek, J., Estigarribia, B., & Roberts, J. (2009). Language characteristics of individuals with Down syndrome. Topics in Language Disorders, 29, 112–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memmert, D. (2006). The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness. Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 15, 620–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Iacono, T. (Eds.) (2009). Autism spectrum disorders and AAC. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrom, M., Andersson, R., Holmqvist, K., & van de Weijer, J. (2013). The influence of calibration method and eye physiology on eye-tracking data quality. Behavioral Research, 45, 272–288.
   Google Scholar
• Pelphrey, K. A., Sasson, N. J., Reznick, J. S., Paul, G., Goldman, B. D., & Piven, J. (2002). Visual scanning of faces in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 249–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulton E. (1962). Peripheral vision, refractoriness and eye movements in fast oral reading. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2008). Viewing it differently: Social scene perception in Williams syndrome and autism. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2855–2860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2009a). Looking at movies and cartoons: Eye-tracking evidence from Williams syndrome and autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 169–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2009b). Do faces capture the attention of individuals with Williams syndrome or autism? Evidence from tracking eye movements.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 421–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., Koul, R., & Costello, J. (2007). Asking well-built questions for evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40, 225–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., & Sigafoos, J. (2006). Augmentative and alternative communication interventions for persons with developmental disabilities: Narrative review of comparative single-subject experimental studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bischof, W., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real-world scenes. Brain Research, 1080, 101–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spezio, M. L., Adolphs, R., Hurley, R. S. E., & Piven, J. (2007). Analysis of face gaze in autism using “Bubbles”. Neuropsychologia, 45, 144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D., Ullman, C., & Longenecker, M. (2014). Measurement of the visual attention patterns of people with aphasia: A preliminary investigation of two types of human engagement in photographic images. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. (2013). Speech language pathologists’ decisions when designing aided AAC displays: A survey. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Light, J. (2014). Preliminary study of gaze toward humans in photographs by individuals with autism, Down syndrome, or other intellectual disabilities: Implications for design of visual scene displays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 130–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Light, J. (2011). Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 54, 1644–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., O’Neill, T., & McIlvane, W. J. (2014). Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-aged children without disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. doi:10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0159.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar