Teaching Graphic Symbol Combinations to Children with Limited Speech During Shared Story Reading

References

• Angelo, D. H., & Goldstein, H. (1990). Effects of a pragmatic teaching strategy for requesting information by communication board users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 231–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold, D. H., Lonigan, C. J., Whitehurst, G. J., & Epstein, J. N. (1994). Accelerating language development through picture book reading: Replication and extension to videotape training format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banajee, M., Dicarlo, C., & Stricklin, S. B. (2003). Core vocabulary determination for toddlers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 67–73. doi:10.1080/0743461031000112034.
   Google Scholar
• Basil, C. (1992). Social interaction and learnt helplessness in severely disabled children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 188–199. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276183.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Dale, P., & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Handbook of child language (pp. 96–151). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 323–338. doi:10.1080/07434610802130978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Ewing, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 19, 108–120. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black Sheep Press (2004, 2006). Resources for speech and language. West York, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, M. (1997). South African language assessments. Ponteland, UK: STASS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, C., Trudeau, N., & Sutton, A. (2012). Performance of children with typical development when reading and interpreting graphic-symbol sequences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 96–105. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.679236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, M. L., Hoffman, P. R., & Norris, J. A. (1998). Efficacy of expansions and cloze procedures in the development of interpretations by preschool children exhibiting delayed language development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 85–95. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2902.85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, K. M., & Von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 176–210). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Canut, E. (2001). Narrative activity in adult-child interaction based on the text of illustrated storybooks: Its contribution to the elaboration of children's syntax and representations of literacy. In M. Almgren, A. Barreňa, M.-J. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal, & B. McWhinney (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (pp. 279–300). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 50–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Huguet, A., & Bornman, J. (2013). The iconicity of picture communication symbols for children with English additional language and mild intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 360–373. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.849753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, P. S., Crain-Thoreson, C., Notari-Syverson, A., & Cole, K. (1996). Parent-child book reading as an intervention technique for young children with languge delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 213–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. (2013, April 24). SA's shifting language landscape. Daily Maverick. Retrieved from http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2013-04-24-sas-shifting-language-landscape/#.Ub9oBtio1XV.
   Google Scholar
• De Klerk, V. (2002). Language issues in our schools: Whose voice counts? Part 1: The parent speaks. Perspectives in Education, 20, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: Decision making for children with severely unintelligible speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dukhovny, E., & Soto, G. (2013). Speech generating devices and modality of short-term word storage. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 246–258. doi:10.3109/07434618. 2013.815799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, 4th edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, E. (1959). Straight language for the Deaf. Washington, DC: The Volta Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. (2010). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodologies in behavioral sciences (pp. 276–328). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, S., & Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC Systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (1983). Training generative repertoires within agent-action-object miniature linguistic systems with children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 76–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halle, J., Baer, D., & Spradlin, J. (1981). Teachers’ generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 389–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrave, A. C., & Sénéchal, M. (2000). A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: The benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 5–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. (2007). NCSS [Computer software]. Kaysville, UT: NCSS LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M. & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. W. (1993). Childhood language disorders in context: Infancy through adolescence. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nigam, R., Schlosser, R., & Lloyd, L. L. (2006). Concomitant use of the matrix strategy and the mand-model procedure in teaching graphic symbol combinations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 160–177. doi:10.1080/07434610600650052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, B., Watson, J., & Light, P. (1990). Beyond the single sign: A matrix-based approach to teaching productive sign combinations. Mental Handicap Research, 3, 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Ruder, K. F. (1984). Effects of speech and speech and sign instruction on oral language learning and generalization of action + object combinations in Down's syndrome children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 293–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Barton-Hulsey, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2011). Randomized comparison of augmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Unpublished raw data, Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350–364. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A. (2006). Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 159–167. doi:10.1080/09638280500077804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1996). The medium of the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. Von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2006). Speech, language and aided communication: Connections and questions in a developmental context. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 151–157. doi:0.1080/09638280 500077747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C., & Ninio, A. (1986). The contracts of literacy: What children learn from learning to read books. In W. H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy (pp. 116–138). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Toro-Zambrana, W. (1995). Investigation of Blissymbol use from a language research paradigm. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Striefel, S. Wetherby, B., & Karlan, G. R. (1976). Developing generalized verb-noun instruction-following skills in retarded children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 247–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suchowierska, M. (2006). Recombinative generalization: Some theoretical and practical remarks. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 514–522. doi:10.1080/00207590500492534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Morford, J. (1998). Constituent order in picture pointing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204. doi:10.1080/07434610212331 281271.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M., & Poirier, M. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26. doi:10.1017/S0305000909009477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2013). Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 235–245. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagnais, E., de Broeck, S., & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The effects of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1329. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balkom, H., & Welle Donker-Gimbrère, M. (1996). A psycholinguistic approach to graphic language use. In S. Von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 153–170). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Von Tetzchner, S., & Grove, N. (2003). The development of alternative language forms. In S. Von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 1–27). London, United Kingdom: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S. F., McQuarter, R. J., & Rogers-Warren, A. P. (1984). The effects of mands and models on the speech of unresponsive language-delayed preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1994). Emergence of visual-graphic symbol combinations by youth with moderate to severe mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 883–895.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L., & Hood, E. (2004). Shared storybook reading with children who have little or no functional speech: A language intervention tool for students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Perspectives in Education, 22, 101–113.
   Google Scholar