New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks

References

• Barker DJ. The developmental origins of adult disease. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23(Suppl):588S–95S.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, Johannsson G, Rapaport R, Rogol A. Management of the child born small for gestational age through to adulthood: a consensus statement of the International Societies of Pediatric Endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:804–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris SA, Osmond C, Gigante D, Kuzawa CW, Ramakrishnan L, Lee NR, et al. Size at birth, weight gain in infancy and childhood, and adult diabetes risk in five low- or middle-income country birth cohorts. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:72–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Buttarelli M, Franchi M, Durig P, et al. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 109:160–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, Vohr BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e290–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyzaguirre F, Bancalari R, Roman R, Silva R, Youlton R, Urquidi C, et al. Prevalence of components of the metabolic syndrome according to birthweight among overweight and obese children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2012;25:51–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnattingius S, Villamor E, Lagerros YT, Wikstrom AK, Granath F. High birth weight and obesity—a vicious circle across generations. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36:1320–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PA, Chernausek SD, Hokken-Koelega AC, Czernichow P; International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board. International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board consensus development conference statement: management of short children born small for gestational age, April 24-October 1, 2001. Pediatrics. 2003;111(Pt 1):1253–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hemming K, Hutton JL, Glinianaia SV, Jarvis SN, Platt MJ. Differences between European birthweight standards: impact on classification of ‘small for gestational age’. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:906–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertino E, Milani S, Fabris C, De Curtis M. Neonatal anthropometric charts: what they are, what they are not. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunde A, Melve KK, Gjessing HK, Skjaerven R, Irgens LM. Genetic and environmental influences on birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age by use of population-based parent-offspring data. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:734–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt M, Rochow N, Jahrig K, Straube S, Hufnagel S, Jorch G. Dependence of neonatal small and large for gestational age rates on maternal height and weight—an analysis of the German Perinatal Survey. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:425–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson W, Choh AC, Soloway LE, Czerwinski SA, Towne B, Demerath EW. Eighty-year trends in infant weight and length growth: the Fels longitudinal study. J Pediatr. 2012;160:762–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahmann PH, Wills RA, Coory M. Trends in birth size and macrosomia in Queensland, Australia, from1988 to 2005. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol.2009;23:533–41.
   Google Scholar
• Schack-Nielsen L, Molgaard C, Sorensen TI, Greisen G, Michaelsen KF. Secular change in size at birth from 1973 to 2003: national data from Denmark. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:1257–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pihkala J, Hakala T, Voutilainen P, Raivio K. Characteristic of recent fetal growth curves in Finland. Duodecim. 1989;105:1540–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saari A, Sankilampi U, Hannila ML, Kiviniemi V, Kesseli K, Dunkel L. New Finnish growth references for children and adolescents aged 0 to 20 years: length/height-for-age, weight-for-length/height, and body mass index-for-age. Ann Med. 2011;43:235–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki P, Wikström K, Hakulinen-Viitanen T, Laatikainen T, editors. Health checkups at well-child clinics. Methodological handbook. Juvenes Print, Tampere, Finland 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA. Generalized Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2007;23(7):1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181:129–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Merialdi M, Platt LD, Kramer MS. Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202:522–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Bernstein IM. Optimal growth modeling. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32:148–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertino E, Giuliani F, Occhi L, Spada E, De Curtis M, Coscia A, et al. Benchmarking neonatal anthropometric charts published in the last decade. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F233.
   Google Scholar
• Bertino E, Spada E, Occhi L, Coscia A, Giuliani F, Gagliardi L, et al. Neonatal anthropometric charts: the Italian neonatal study compared with other European studies. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51: 353–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole TJ, Williams AF, Wright CM; RCPCH Growth Chart Expert Group. Revised birth centiles for weight, length and head circumference in the UK-WHO growth charts. Ann Hum Biol. 2011;38:7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklasson A, Albertsson-Wikland K. Continuous growth reference from 24th week of gestation to 24 months by gender. BMC Pediatr. 2008; 8:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen IE, Groveman SA, Lawson ML, Clark RH, Zemel BS. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e214–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser GH, Eilers PH, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Merkus HM, Wit JM. New Dutch reference curves for birthweight by gestational age. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85:737–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk RT, Zhang J, Betran AP, Souza JP, Mori R, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles. Lancet. 2011;377:1855–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helakorpi S, Holstila A-L, Virtanen S, Uutela A. Health behaviour and health among the Finnish adult population, spring 2011. Report 45/2012. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. 1992;339:283–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG. 2001;108:830–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Figueras J, Meler E, Eixarch E, Coll O, Gratacos E, et al. Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F277–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongelli M, Figueras F, Francis A, Gardosi J. A customized birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47:128–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carberry AE, Gordon A, Bond DM, Hyett J, Raynes-Greenow CH, Jeffery HE. Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (12)12:CD008549.
   Google Scholar
• Cha HH, Lee SH, Park JS, Woo SY, Kim SW, Choi SJ, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age infants classified by population-based versus customised birth weight standards. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:348–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groom KM, Poppe KK, North RA, McCowan LM. Small-for- gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:239.e1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemming K, Hutton JL, Bonellie S. A comparison of customized and population-based birth-weight standards: the influence of gestational age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:41–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, Joseph KS, Kramer MS. The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality. BJOG. 2007;114:474–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheon JA, Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, Kramer MS. The case against customised birthweight standards. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25:11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheon JA, Zhang X, Cnattingius S, Kramer MS, Platt RW. Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?BJOG. 2008;115:1397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph KS, Fahey J, Platt RW, Liston RM, Lee SK, Sauve R, et al. An outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate standards?Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 169:616–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glinianaia SV, Skjaerven R, Magnus P. Birthweight percentiles by gestational age in multiple births. A population-based study of Norwegian twins and triplets. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:450–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckler JM, Green M. Birth weight and head circumference standards for English twins. Arch Dis Child. 1994;71:516–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydhstrom H. Discordant birthweight and late fetal death in like- sexed and unlike-sexed twin pairs: a population-based study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:765–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gielen M, Lindsey PJ, Derom C, Loos RJ, Souren NY, Paulussen AD, et al. Twin-specific intrauterine ‘growth’ charts based on cross-sectional birthweight data. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008;11:224–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grande R, Escalante JM, Hernandez M, Ezcurdia MA. [Birth weight in twins (author’s transl)]. An Esp Pediatr. 1976;9:353–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:168–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ego A, Subtil D, Grange G, Thiebaugeorges O, Senat MV, Vayssiere C, et al. Should parity be included in customised fetal weight standards for identifying small-for-gestational-age babies?Results from a French multicentre study. BJOG. 2008;115:1256–64.
   Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland (OSF). Births [e-publication]. ISSN = 1798-2413. 2011, Appendix table 1. Total fertility rate by region 2001–2011. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Available at: http://www.stat.fi/til/synt/2011/synt_2011_2012-04-13_tau_001_en.html. (accessed 7 May 2012).
   Google Scholar