The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications

References

• Bullinger M. Indices versus profiles - advantages and disadvantages. Quality of life assessment. Key issues in the 1990s, S R Walker, R M Rosser. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1993; 209–20
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen H. An approach to economic evaluation of actions for health. A theoretic-methodological study in health economics with special reference to Finnish health policy. Official Statistics of Finland, Special Social Studies XXXII: 74. Government Printing Centre, Helsinki 1981
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen H. An approach to measuring and valuing health states. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15C: 55–65
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen H, Pekurinen M. A generic 15 dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D). J Soc Med 1989; 26: 85–96
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen H, Pekurinen M. A fifteen dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D) and its applications. Quality of life assessment. Key issues in the 1990s, S R Walker, R M Rosser. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1993; 185–95
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen H. The 15D-measure of health-related quality of life. I. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, Vict 1994, Working Paper 41
   Google Scholar
• Torrance G W, Boyle M H, Horwood S P. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preference for health states. Operations Research 1982; 30: 1043–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle M H, Torrance G W. Developing multiattribute health indexes. Med Care 1984; 22: 1045–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirshner B, Guyatt G H. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis 1985; 38: 27–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt G H, Deyo R A, Charlson M, Levine M N, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 403–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sintonen H, Arinen S -S. The health status of the adult Finnish population as measured by life expectancy, the 15D and QALYs. J Soc Med 1997; 34: 182–8
   Google Scholar
• Hunt S M, McKenna S P, McEven J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15A: 221–9
   Google Scholar
• Stewart A L, Hayes R D, Ware J E. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26: 724–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallowfield L. The quality of life. The missing measurement in health care. Souvenir Press, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Ohinmaa A. Indexing health-related quality of life: A comparison of preference-weighted and unweighted indexes. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. Oulu University Press, G I. OuluFinland 1997
   Google Scholar
• Rosser R M. A health index and output measure. Quality of life assessment. Key issues in the 1990s, S R Walker, R M Rosser. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1993; 151–78
   Google Scholar
• Nord E. Health status index models for use in resource allocation decisions. A critical revirew in the light of observed preferences for social choice. Int J Techn Assess Health Care 1996; 12: 31–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rissanen P, Sogaard J, Sintonen H. Do QOL instruments agree? A comparison of the 15D and NHP in hip and knee replacements. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 696–705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patrick D L, Erickson P. Assessing health-related quality of life for clinical decision making. Quality of life assessment. Key issues in the 1990s, S R Walker, R M Rosser. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1993; 11–63
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen H. The 15D-measure of health-related quality of life. II. Feasibility, reliability and validity of its valuation system. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, Vict 1995, Working Paper 42
   Google Scholar
• Stavem K. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multiattribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 45–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day N. A Comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with Four Other Generic Utility Instruments. Ann Med 2001; 33: xx–xx
   Google Scholar
• Torrance G W. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Health Econ 1986; 5: 1–30
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J. Cost-utility analysis. What should be measured. Soc Sci Med 1994; 39: 7–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord E. Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 559–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. The measurement and valuation of health: A chronicle. Centre for Health Economics, New YorkUK 1995, Discussion Paper 130
   Google Scholar
• Torrance G W, Zhang Y, Feeny D H, et al. Multiattribute preference functions for a comprehensive health status classification system. McMaster University, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Hamilton, Ont 1992, Working Paper 92–18
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan R M, Anderson J P. A general health model. Update and applications. Health Serv Res 1988; 23: 203–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser R, Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: Is there a social consensus. Int J Epidem 1978; 7: 347–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord E. Cost-value analysis in health care. Making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999
   Google Scholar
• The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J A, Ohinmaa A, Murti B, Sintonen H S, Coons S J. Comparison of Finnish and US.-based visual analog scale valuations of the EQ-5D measure. Med Decis Making 2000; 20: 282–9
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen H. Outcome measurement in acid-related diseases. PharmacoEconomics 1994; 5((Suppl 3))17–26
   Google Scholar
• Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, et al. Quality of life in pre-adolescence: A seventeen-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 532–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, et al. Quality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 205–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar