The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life

References

• Reuben D B, Valle L A, Hays R D, Siu A L. Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: a comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 17–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart A L, Sherbourne C D, Hays R D, Wells K B, Nelson E C, Kamberg C J, . Summary and discussion of MOS measures. Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach, A L Stewart, J E Ware, et al. Duke University Press, Durhan, NC 1992; 345–71
   Google Scholar
• McHorney C A, Kosinksi M, Ware J E. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 1994; 32: 551–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell D S, Kahn C D. Health status assessment via the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Annu Ml Symp 1996; 338–42
   Google Scholar
• The medical informatics and decision science consortium. Sept 4, 2000, Your Health [Online]. Available at: http://www.mcw.edu/midas/health/
   Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Sherbourne C D, Mazel R M. The RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993; 2: 217–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RAND-36 Item Health Survey 1.0 [Online]. RAND Health Program. Sept 5, 2000, Available at: http://www.rand.org/organization/health/healthpubnav.html
   Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Prince-Embury S, Chen H. RAND-36 health status inventory. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1998
   Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Kosinski M, Keller S D. SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual. The Health Institute: New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Morales L S, Reise S P. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000; 38: II-28–II-42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Marshall G N, Wang E YI, Sherbourne C D. Four-year cross-lagged associations between physical and mental health in the Medical Outcomes Study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 441–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Kosinksi M, Bayliss M S, McHorney C A, Rogers W H, Raczek A. Comparisons of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995; 33: AS264–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter P R, Stump T E, Tierney W M, Wolinsky F D. The psychometric properties of the SF-36 health survey among older adults in a clinical setting. J Clin Geropsychol 1996; 2: 225–37
   Google Scholar
• Rummel R J. Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL 1970
   Google Scholar
• Simon G E, Revicki D A, Grothaus L, Vonkorff M. SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct. Med Care 1998; 36: 567–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nortvedt M, Riise T, Myhr K, Nyland H. Performance of the SF-36, SF-12 and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Med Care 2000; 38: 1022–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Cunningham W E, Sherbourne C D, Wilson I B, Wu A W, Cleary P D, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection in the United States: results from the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study. Am J Med 2000; 108: 714–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Wells K B, Sherbourne C B, Rogers W H, Spritzer K. Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared to chronic general medical illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52: 11–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart A L, Hays R D, Wells K B, Rogers W H, Spritzer K L, Greenfield S. Long-term functioning and well-being outcomes associated with physical activity and exercise in patients with chronic conditions in the Medical Outcomes Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 719–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman M L, Williams G R, Lipscomb J, Matchar D. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics 1999; 15: 141–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansky D, Butler J B, Waller F T. Using health status measures in the hospital setting: from acute care to ‘outcomes management’. Med Care 1992; 30: MS57–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampal P, Martin C, Marquis P, Ware J E, Bonfils S. A quality of life study in five hundred and eighty-one duodenal ulcer patients: maintenance versus intermittent treatment with nizatidine. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 206: 44–51
   Google Scholar
• van Walraven C, Mahon J L, Moher D, Bohm C, Laupacis A. Surveying physicians to determine the minimal important difference: implications for sample-size calculation. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 717–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Woolley J M. How meaningful is the concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality of life research. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 18: 419–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozzette S A, Hays R D, Berry S, Kanouse D. A perceived health index for use in persons with advanced HIV disease: derivation, reliability, and validity. Med Care 1994; 32: 716–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Alonso J, Coons S J. Possibilities for summarizing health-related quality of life when using a profile instrument. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methods and practice, M Staquet, R Hays, P Fayers. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998; 143–53
   Google Scholar
• Gold M R, Patrick D L, Torrance G W, Fryback D G, Hadorn D C, Kamlet N D, . Identifying and valuing outcomes. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, M R Gold, J E Siegel, L B Russell, et al. Oxford University Press, New York 1996; 82–134
   Google Scholar
• Reuben D B, Frank J C, Hirsch S H, McGuigan K A, Maly R C. A randomized clinical trial of outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment coupled with an intervention to increase adherence to recommendations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 269–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler E B, Robalino D A, Frank J C, Hirsch S H, Maly R C, Reuben D B. Cost-effectiveness of outpatient geriatric assessment with an intervention to increase adherence. Med Care 1999; 37: 1199–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengs T O, Adams M E, Pliskin J S, Safran D G, Siegel J E, Weinstein M C, et al. Five hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Analysis 1995; 15: 369–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki D A, Kaplan R M. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 477–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryback D G, Lawrence W F, Martin P A, Klein R, Klein B EK. Predicting Quality of Well-Being scores from the SF-36: results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Med Decis Making 1997; 17: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J. The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey and its use in pharamacoeconomic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 7: 403–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1115–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugar C A, Sturm R, Lee T T, Sherbourne C D, Olshen R A, Wells K B, et al. Empirically defined health states for depression from the SF-12. Health Services Res 1998; 33: 911–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenert L A, Sherbourne C D, Sugar C, Wells K B. Estimation of utilities for the effects of depression from the SF-12. Med Care 2000; 38: 763–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 903–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplege A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 913–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SF-36 Health Survey [Online]. Health Assessment Lab. Sept 4, 2000, Available at: http://www.sf36.com
   Google Scholar
• Mullin P A, Lohr K N, Bresnahan B W, McNulty P. Applying cognitive design principles to formatting HRQOL instruments. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 13–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olufade A O, Shaw J W, Foster S A, Leischow S J, Andrejasich C M, Hays R D, et al. Development of the smoking cessation quality of life (SCQoL) questionnaire. Clin Therapeutics 1999; 21: 2113–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gralnek I M, Hays R D, Kim S, Rosen H R, Keeffe E B, Artinian L, et al. Development and evaluation of the Liver Disease Quality of Life instrument in patients with advanced, chronic liver disease - LDQOL 1.0. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3552–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Download and Demo SF-36 (Online). Quality Metric Inc. Sept 7, 2000, Available at: http://www.qmetric.com/products/assessments/sf36/sf36v2.php3/
   Google Scholar
• Coons S J, Rao S, Keininger D L, Hays R D. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmaco-economics 2000; 17: 13–35
   Google Scholar