Upper airways sensory irritation responses of mice exposed to mainstream smoke from four cigarette types

References

• ACGIH (2006). TLVs and BEIs, based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference Of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
   Google Scholar
• Agresti A (1990). Categorical Data Analysis, pp 419–425, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Alarie Y (1966). “Irritation properties of airborne materials to the upper respiratory tract,” Arch Environ Health 13:433–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarie Y (1973). “Sensory irritation of the upper airways by airborne chemicals,” Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 24:279–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarie Y (1981a). “Bioassay for evaluating the potency of airborne sensory irritants and predicting acceptable levels of exposure in man,” Food Cosmet Toxicol 19:623–626.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alarie Y (1981b). “Dose–response analysis in animal studies: Prediction of human responses,” Environ Health Perspect 42:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarie Y (1998). “Computer-based bioassay for evaluation of sensory irritation of airborne chemicals and its limit of detection,” Arch Toxicol 72:277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarie Y (2000). “Computerized animal bioassay to evaluate the effects of airborne chemicals on the respiratory tract,” In: Spengler JD, Samet JM, McCarthy JF, editors. Indoor Air Quality Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton S, Krautter GR, Lauterbach JH, St. Charles FK (2003). “Influence of puff volume, puff frequency and vent-blocking on the mutagenicity of mainstream cigarette smoke condensate,” Abstract 45, Presented at the 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Norfolk, VA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM Standard E 981 (2004). “Standard test method for estimating sensory irritancy of airborne chemicals,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres PH, Hayes JR, Higuchi MA, Mosberg AT, Sagartz JW (2001). “Subchronic inhalation of rats of mainstream smoke from a cigarette that primarily heats tobacco compared to a cigarette that burns tobacco,” Inhal Toxicol 13:149–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres PH, Mosberg AT, Coggins CRE (1990). “Modernization of nose-only smoking machines for use in animal inhalation studies,” J Am Coll Toxicol 9:441–446.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow CS, Alarie Y, Warrick J, Stock M (1977). “Comparison of the sensory irritant response in mice to chlorine and hydrogen chloride,” Arch Environ Health 3:68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Coggins CRE (1980). “Description of continuous smoking inhalation machine for exposing small animals to tobacco smoke,” Beiträge Tabakforsch Int. 10:169–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombick BR, Murli, H, Avalos JT, Bombick DW, Morgan WT, Putnam KP, Doolittle DJ (1997). “Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 2. In vitro toxicity of whole smoke,” Food Chem Toxicol 36:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Borgerding MF, Bodnar JA, Chung HL, Manga PP, Morrison CC, Risner CH, Rogers JC, Simmons DF, Uhrig MS, Wendelboe FN, Wingate DE, Winkler LS (1998). “Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 1. Chemical composition of mainstream smoke,” Food Chem Toxicol 36:169–182.
   Google Scholar
• Borgerding MF, Dixon M (2006). “Recent advances in the application and understanding of alternative smoking regimens,” 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference Proceedings, Recent Adv Tobacco Sci 32:3–83.
   Google Scholar
• Bos PM, Busschers M, Arts JH (2003). “Sensory irritation testing,” J Occup Environ Med 45:467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bos P, Busschers M, Arts J (2002). “Evaluation of the sensory irritation test (Alarie test) for the assessment of respiratory tract irritation,” J Occup Environ Med 44:968–976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bos P, Zwart P, Eeuzel P, Bragt P (1991). “Evaluation of the sensory irritation test for the assessment of occupational health risk,” Crit Rev Toxicol 21:423–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins JF, Alexeeff GV, Lewis DV, Dodge DE, Marty MA, Parker TR (2004). “Development of acute inhalation reference exposure levels (RELs) to protect the public from predictable excursion of airborne toxicants,” J Appl Toxicol 24:155–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Counts ME, Morton MJ, Laffoon SW, Cox RH, Lipowicz PJ (2005). “Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions,” Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 41:185–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy JWD, Bombick BR, Bombick DW, Doolittle DJ, Mosberg AT, Swauger JE (2004). “A comparison of in vitro toxicities of cigarette smoke condensate from Eclipse cigarettes and four commercially available ultra low-“tar” cigarettes,” Food Chem Toxicol 42:243–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnaire F, Marignac B, Hecht G, Héry M (2002). “Sensory irritation of acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, peroxyacetic acid and their mixture in mice,” Ann Occup Hyg 46:97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnaire F, Marignac B, Morel G, Nunge H, Grossmann S (2003). “Sensory irritation due to methyl-2-cyanoacrylate, ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate, isopropyl-2-cyanoacrylate and 2-methoxyethyl-2-cyanoacrylate in mice,” Ann Occup Hyg 47:297–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemmilä M, Hihkiö M, Kasanen JP, Turunen M, Hautamäki M, Pasanen AL, Linnainmaa K (2007). “In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the acute toxicity, the genotoxicity, and the irritation potency of two hexachloroethane-based pyrotechnic smokes,” J Toxicol Environ Health A 70:1167–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane L, Barrow C, Alarie Y (1979). “A short-term test to predict acceptable levels of exposure to airborne sensory irritants,” J Am Ind Hyg Assoc 40:207–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara Y, Alexeeff GV, Broadwin R, Salmon AG (2007). “Evaluation and application of the RD50 for public exposure levels,” Environ Health Perspect 115:1609–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J, Wilkie W, Shusterman D (2005). “Acute respiratory responses of the mouse to chlorine,” Toxicol Sci 83:380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1996). “The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,” Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen G, Hansen L (1993). “Sensory irritation of the upper respiratory tract,” Pharm Toxicol 72(Suppl 3):32–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen G, Wolkoff P, Alarie Y (2007). “Sensory irritation: risk assessment approaches,” Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 48:6–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer E, Stabbert R, Rustemeier K, Veltel DJ, Meisgen TJ, Reininghaus W, Carchman RA, Gaworski CL, Podraz KF (2004). “Chemical composition, cytotoxicity and mutagenecity of smoke from US commercial and reference cigarettes smoked under two sets of machine smoking conditions,” Toxicology 195:31–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaper M (1993). “Development of a database for sensory irritants and its use in establishing occupational exposure limits,” Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 54:488–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadler J, Kennedy G (1996). “Evaluation of the sensory irritation potential of volatile organic chemicals from carpets—Alone and in combination,” Food Chem Toxicol 34:1125–1130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan R, Schaper M, Thompson R, Stock MF, Boylstein LA, Luo JE, et al. (1994). “Computer assisted recognition and quantitation of the effects of airborne chemicals acting at differing areas of the respiratory tract,” Arch Toxicol 68:490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar