A comparative assessment of cigarette smoke aerosols using an in vitro air–liquid interface cytotoxicity test

References

• Adamson J, Thorne D, Dalrymple A, et al. (2013). Assessment of cigarette smoke particle deposition within the Vitrocell® exposure module using quartz crystal microbalances. Chem Cent J 7:50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson J, Thorne D, Errington G, et al. (2014). An inter-machine comparison of tobacco smoke particle deposition in vitro from six independent smoke exposure systems. Toxicol In Vitro 28:1320–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoli C, Gigante D, Nunziata A. (2003). A review of in vitro methods to assess the biological activity of tobacco smoke with the aim of reducing the toxicology of smoke. Toxicol In Vitro 17:587–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzopardi D, Haswell L, Foss-Smith G, et al. (2015). Evaluation of an air–liquid interface cell culture model for studies on the inflammatory and cytotoxic responses to tobacco smoke aerosols. Toxicol In Vitro 29:1720–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombick D, Bombick R, Ayres P, et al. (1997). Evaluation of the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of mainstream whole smoke and smoke condensate from a cigarette containing a novel carbon filter. Fund Appl Toxicol 39:11–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Branton P, McAdam K, Winter D, et al. (2011a). Reduction of aldehydes and hydrogen cyanide yields in mainstream cigarette smoke using an amine functionalised ion exchange resin. Chem Cent J 5:15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branton P, McAdam K, Duke M, et al. (2011b). Use of classical adsorption theory to understand the dynamic filtration of volatile toxicants in cigarette smoke by active carbons. Adsorp Sci Technol 29:117–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns D, Dybing E, Gray N, et al. (2008). Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: a description of the World Health Organization TobReg proposal. Tobacco Control 2008;17:132–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins C, Gaworski C. (2008). Could charcoal filtration of cigarette smoke reduce smoking-induced disease? A review of the literature. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 50:359–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich D, Fieblekorn R, Bevan M, et al. (2014). Approaches for the design of reduced toxicant emission cigarettes. SpringerPlus 3:374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle D, Lee C, Ivett J, et al. (1990). Comparative studies on the genotoxic activity of mainstream smoke condensate from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco. Environ Mol Mutagenesis 15:93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowles J, Dybing E. (2003). Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tob Control 12:424–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukano Y, Ogura M, Eguchi K, et al. (2004). Modified procedure of a direct in vitro exposure system for mammalian cells to whole tobacco smoke. Exp Toxicol Pathol 55:317–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goniewicz M, Knysak J, Gawron M, et al. (2014). Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control 23:133–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I. (1997). The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. J Toxicol Environ Health 50:307–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IARC. (2004). Monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking, vol. 83. France, Lyon: IARC
   Google Scholar
• IARC. (2008). Monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), vol. 97. Lyon: IARC
   Google Scholar
• IARC. (2012). Monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Chemical Agents and Related Occupations, vol. 100F. Lyon, France: IARC
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. (2011). Scientific standards for studies on modified risk tobacco products. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (1999). Tobacco and tobacco products – Atmosphere for conditioning and testing. ISO 3402:1999. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2012). Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine – Definitions and standard conditions. ISO 3308:2012. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). Guidance on genotoxicity testing and data interpretation for pharmaceuticals intended for human use. Available from: http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/guidance-on-genotoxicity-testing-anddatainterpretation-for-pharmaceuticals-intended-for-human-use.html. [Last accessed: 25 Aug 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Jack A, Morris J, et al. (2008). RNA interference (RNAi)-induced suppression of nicotine demethylase activity reduces levels of a key carcinogen in cured tobacco leaves. Plant Biotechnol J 6:346–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, DeGrandpre Y, Porter A, et al. (2011). The use of a novel treatment process to reduce toxicant yields in cigarette smoke. Food Chem Toxicol 49:1904–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeed S, Frentzel S, Wagner S, et al. (2014). Characterization of the Vitrocell® 24/48 in vitro aerosol exposure system using mainstream cigarette smoke. Chem Cent J 8:62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam K, Gregg E, Liu C, et al. (2011). The use of a novel tobacco-substitute sheet and smoke dilution to reduce toxicant yields in cigarette smoke. Food Chem Toxicol 49:1684–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman A. (1999). Cigarette design and materials. In: Davis DL, Nielsen MT. (eds.) Tobacco production, chemistry, and technology 1999. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 353–87
   Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Kluss B, Richter A, Massey D. (2005). Exposure of bronchial epithelial cells to whole cigarette smoke: assessment of cellular responses. Altern Lab Animals 33:239–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgman A, Perfetti T. (2013). The chemical components of Tobacco and Tobacco smoke. 2nd edition. Chapter 28. ISBN: 978-1-4200-7883-1
   Google Scholar
• Roemer E, Schramke H, Weiler H, et al. (2012). Mainstream smoke chemistry and in vitro and in vivo toxicity of reference cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International/Contrib Tob Res 25:316–35
   Google Scholar
• Shin H-J, Sohn H-O, Han J-H, et al. (2009). Effect of cigarette filters on the chemical composition and in vitro biological activity of cigarette mainstream smoke. Food Chem Toxicol 47:192–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R. (2001). Clearing the smoke: assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. In: Institute of Medicine (eds). Washington, DC: National Academies Press
   Google Scholar
• Smith C, McKams S, Davis R, et al. (1996). Human urine mutagenicity study comparing cigarettes which burn or primarily heat tobacco. Mutat Res Environ Mutagenesis Relat Sub 361:1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne D, Adamson J. (2013a). A review of cigarette smoke exposure systems. Exp Toxicol Pathol 65:1183–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne D, Kilford K, Payne R, et al. (2013b). Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis. Chem Cent J 7:146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne D, Kilford J, Payne R, et al. (2014). Development of a BALB/c 3T3 neutral red uptake cytotoxicity test using a mainstream cigarette smoke exposure system. BMC Res Notes 7:367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). ICCVAM test method method evaluation report. In vitro cytotoxicity test methods for estimating starting doses for acute oral systemic cytotoxicity. Available from: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/iccvam/docs/acutetox_docs/brd_tmer/at-tmer-complete.pdf. [Last accessed: 25 Aug 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Tokida A, Atobe I, Maeda K. (1985). Adsorption of the vapor phase components in cigarette smoke by activated carbon in vented cigarettes. Agric Biol Chem 49:3109–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Blücher H, Böhringer B, Giebelhausen J-M (2006). Pat. No. EP1918022 - High performance adsorbents based on active carbon with high micro-porosity
   Google Scholar
• Witschi H, Espiritu I, Maronpot R, et al. (1997). The carcinogenic potential of the gas phase of environmental tobacco smoke. Carcinogenesis 11:2035–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright C. (2015). Standardized methods for the regulation of cigarette-smoke constituents. Trends Anal Chem 66:118–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar