Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Cut Point Between Fine and Coarse Ambient Mass Fractions

References

• Appel B. R. Atmospheric sample analysis and sampling artifacts. Aerosol measurement, K. Willeke, P. A. Baron. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1993; 233–259
   Google Scholar
• Baron P. A., Heitbrink W. A. Factors affecting aerosol measurement quality. Aerosol measurement, K. Willeke, P. A. Baron. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1993; 130–145
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell B. K., Rubow K. L. Proc. 7th international Pneumoconisoses Conf., Washington, DC, 1990. NIOSH, 651–655, Mineral dust and diesel exhaust aerosol measurements in underground metal and nonmetal mines., NIOSH Publication 90–108
   Google Scholar
• Clark W. E., Whitby K. T. Concentration and size distribution measurements of atmospheric aerosols and a test of the theory of self-preserving size distribution. J. Atmos. Sci. 1967; 24: 677–687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper D. W. Methods of size distribution data analysis and presentation. Aerosol measurement, K. Willeke, P. A. Baron. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1993; 146–176
   Google Scholar
• Divita F. Size Distribution and Sources of Submicrometer Atmospheric Particles in Washington D.C. and Philadelphia PA. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park 1993
   Google Scholar
• Dodd I. A., Ondov I. M., Tuncel G., Dzubay T. G., Stevens R. K. Multimodal size spectrum of submicrometer particles bearing various elements in rural air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991; 25: 890–903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han M. Receptor Modeling of Airborne Pollutants in the State of Maryland. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park 1992
   Google Scholar
• Hidy G. M. Summary of the California Aerosol Characterization Experiment. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1975; 25: 1106–1114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden T. M., Noll K. E. Dry deposition of atmospheric particles: Application of current models to ambient data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992; 26: 1807–1815
   Google Scholar
• Jaenicke R., Junge C. Studien zur Oberen Grensgrosse des Natiirlichen Aerosoles. Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 1967; 40: 129–143
   Google Scholar
• Junge C. E. Air chemistry and radioactivity. Academic Press, New York 1963
   Google Scholar
• Junge C. E. The size distribution and aging of natural aerosol as determined from electrical and optical data on the atmosphere. J. Meteorol. 1955; 12: 13–25
   Google Scholar
• Lin J. M., Fang G. C., Holden T. M., Noll K. E. A comparison of dry deposition modeled from size distribution data and measured with a smooth surface for total particle mass, lead and calcium in Chicago. Atmos. Environ. 1993; 27A: 1131–1138
   Google Scholar
• Lin J. J., Noll K. E., Holden T. M. Dry deposition velocities as a function of particle size in the ambient atmosphere. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1994; 20: 239–252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren D. A. Atmospheric aerosol composition and concentration as a function of particle size and of time. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1970; 20: 603–608
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundgren D. A., Paulus H. J. The mass distribution of large atmospheric particles. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1973; 25: 1227–1231
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren D. A., Rangaraj C. N. A method for the estimation of fugitive dust emission potentials. Powder Technol. 1986; 47: 61–69
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren D. A., Rovell-Rixx D. C. Wide Range Aerosol Classifier. NTIS, Springfield, VA 1982, EPA-G00/4–82–040, PB82–256564
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren D. A., Hausknecht B. J., Burton R. M. Large particle size distribution in five U.S. cities and the effect on a new ambient particulate matter standard (PM-10). Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1984; 7: 467–473
   Google Scholar
• Mamane Y., Noll K. E. Characterization of large particles at a rural site in the Eastern United States: Mass distribution and individual particle analysis. Atmos. Environ. 1985; 19: 611–622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurry P. H. Size-Dependent Chemical Composition of Los Angeles Aerosols. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota. 1985, A Report on Measurements Made Aug. 8–10, 1984. Particle Technology Laboratory report no. 568 May
   Google Scholar
• McMurry P. H. Organic and Elemental Carbon Size Distribution of Los Angeles Aerosols Measured During SCAQS. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota. 1989, Particle Technology Laboratory report no. 713 December
   Google Scholar
• McMurry P. H. Data Report on NGS Visibility Study: Moudi Measurements of Carbon, Ion, and Elemental Sized Distributions at Hopi Point Particle Technology Laboratory. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota. 1990, December
   Google Scholar
• McMurry P. H. 1992 Measurement of Haze and Visual Effects (Mohave) Study. Particle Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota. 1993, June
   Google Scholar
• McMurry P. H., Fardi B., Behm S., Marple V. Size-dependent chemical composition of sub-2.5 μm aerosols measured at the Grand Canyon. Transactions Visibility Protection: Research and Policy Aspects APCA Speciality Conference, Grand Teton National Park, WY, September, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Moore D. I., Mason M. J. The concentration, size distribution and production rate of large salt nuclei over the ocean. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1954; 80: 583–590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll K. E., Pilat M. J. Size distribution of atmospheric giant particles. Atmos. Environ. 1971; 5: 527–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll K. E., Pontius A., Frey R., Could M. Comparison of atmospheric coarse particles at an urban and non-urban site. Atmos. Environ. 1985; 19: 1931–1943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll K., Draftz R., Fang K. Y. P. The Composition of Atmospheric Coarse Particles at an Urban and Non-Urban Site. 1986, Illinois Institute of Technology report, Chicago
   Google Scholar
• Noll K. E., Fang K. Y. P., Khalili E. Characterization of atmospheric coarse particles in the Los Angeles basin. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1990; 12: 28–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll K. E., Holden T. M., Fang G. C., Lin J. M. Mass-size distribution and dry deposition flux of particles and metals in Chicago. 85th Meeting Air & Waste Management Assoc., Kansas City, MO, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Okita T. Size distribution of large haze particles. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 1955; 2: 291
   Google Scholar
• Twomey S. The composition of hygroscopic particles in the atmosphere. J. Meteorol. 1954; 11: 334–337
   Google Scholar
• Wall S. M., John W., Ondo J. L. Measurement of aerosol size distributions for nitrate and major ionic species. Atmos. Environ. 1988; 22: 1649–1656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski J. J., Alcocer A. E., Appel B. R. The validation of the undgren impactor. The character and origins of smog aerosols, G. M. Hidy, P. K. Mueller, D. Grosjean, B. R. Appel, J. J. Wesolowski. Wiley, New York 1980; 125–146
   Google Scholar
• Whitby K. T., Husar R. B., Liu B. Y. H. The aerosol size distribution of Los Angeles smog. Aerosols and atmospheric chemistry, G. M. Hidy. Academic Press, New York 1972; 237–264
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock A. H. Atmospheric salt particles and raindrops. J. Meteorol. 1952; 9: 200–212
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock A. H. Salt nuclei in marine air as a function of altitude and wind force. J. Meteorol. 1953; 10: 362–371
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock A. H., Gifford M. M. Sampling atmospheric sea-salt nuclei over the ocean. J. Mar. Res. 1949; 8: 177–197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X., Turpin B. J., McMurry P. H., Hering S. V., Stolzenburg M. R. Mie theory evaluation of species contribution to 1990 wintertime visibility reduction in the Grand Canyon. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1994; 44: 153–162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar