Characterization of human tactile pattern recognition performance at different ages

References

• Bleyenheuft Y, Cols C, Arnould C, Thonnard J-L. Age-related changes in tactile spatial resolution from 6 to 16 years old. Somatosens Mot Res 2006; 23: 83–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce MF. The relation of tactile thresholds to histology in the fingers of elderly people. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43: 730–734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton H, McLaren DG, Sinclair RJ. Reading embossed capital letters: An fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 2006; 27: 325–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaley A, Cooney JW, Rissman J, D’Esposito M. Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 1298–1300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaley A, D’Esposito M. Top-down modulation and normal aging. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007; 1097: 67–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldreich D, Kanics IM. Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 3439–3445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldreich D, Kanics IM. Performance of blind and sighted humans on a tactile grating detection task. Percept Psychophys 2006; 68: 1363–1371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscock M, Inch R, Hawryluk J, Lyon PJ, Perachio N. Is there a sex difference in human laterality? III. An exhaustive survey of tactile laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999; 21: 17–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KO, Phillips JR. Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J Neurophysiol 1981; 46: 1177–1192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KO. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 455–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenbauer T, Sauseng S, Brath H, Abrahamian H, Irsigler K. The value of the Rydel–Seiffer tuning fork as a predictor of diabetic polyneuropathy compared with a neurothesiometer. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 563–567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Reed C. There's more to touch than meets the eye: Relative salience of object dimension for touch with and without vision. J Exp Psychol 1987; 116: 356–369
   Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1993; 84: 29–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1997; 23: 1680–1707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge GE, Madison C, Vaughn BN, Cheong AMY, Miller JC. Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness. Percept Psychophys 2008; 70: 1471–1488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis JM. On the tangibility of letters and Braille. Percept Psychophys 1981; 29: 37–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis JM. A model of character recognition and legibility. J Exp Psychol 1990; 16: 106–120
   Google Scholar
• Manning H, Tremblay F. Age differences in tactile pattern recognition at the fingertip. Somatosens Mot Res 2006; 23: 147–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martina ISJ, van Koningsveld R, Schmitz PIM, van der Meche FGA, van Doorn PA. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65: 743–747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master S, Larue M, Tremblay F. Haptic perception is modified by age, gender and laterality Soc for Neurosci: Neuroscience Meeting Planner, Chicago, IL, 2009: Program No. 78.10.
   Google Scholar
• Pestronk A, Florence J, Levine T, Al-Lozi MT, Lopate G, Miller T, Ramneantu I, Waheed W, Stambuk M. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: Rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude. Neurology 2004; 62: 461–464
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters RM, Hackeman E, Goldreich D. Diminutive digits discern delicate details: Fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 15756–15761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JR, Johnson KO, Hsiao SS. Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 1317–1321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathian K, Zangaladze A. Perceptual learning in tactile hyperacuity: Complete intermanual transfer but limited retention. Exp Brain Res 1998; 118: 131–134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens JC, Patterson MQ. Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: Changes over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 1995; 12: 29–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Choo KK. Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 1996; 13: 153–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Alvarez-Reeves M, Dipietro L, Mack GW, Green BG. Decline of tactile acuity in aging: A study of body site, blood flow, and lifetime habits of smoking and physical activity. Somatosens Mot Res 2003; 20: 271–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilla R, Deshpande G, LaConte S, Hu X, Sathian K. Posteromedial parietal cortical activity and inputs predict tactile spatial acuity. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 11091–11102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tremblay F, Cuenco A, Backman A, Vant K, Wassef M-A. Assessment of spatial acuity at the fingertip with grating (JVP) domes: Validity for use in an eldery population. Somatosens Mot Res 2000; 17: 61–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay F, Wong K, Sanderson R, Cote L. Tactile spatial acuity in elderly persons: Assessment with grating domes and relationship with manual dexterity. Somatosens Mot Res 2003; 20: 127–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay F, Mireault AC, Dessureault L, Manning H, Sveistrup H. Postural stabilization from fingertip contact. II. Relationships between age, tactile sensibility and magnitude of contact forces. Exp Brain Res 2005; 164: 155–164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valeriani M, Ranghi F, Giaquinto S. The effects of aging on selective attention to touch: A reduced inhibitory control in elderly subjects?. Int J Psychophysiol 2003; 9: 75–87
   Google Scholar
• Van Boven RW, Johnson KO. The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: Grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger. Neurology 1994; 44: 2361–2366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven RW, Ingeholm JE, Beauchamp MS, Bikle PC, Ungerleider LG. Tactile form and location processing in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 12601–12605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO, Hsaio SS. Human tactile pattern recognition: Active versus passive touch, velocity effect and patterns of confusion. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 531–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO. Spatial acuity after digit amputation. Brain 2002; 125: 1256–1264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO. Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging. Percept Psychophys 2004; 66: 60–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer D. On the magnitude of laterality effects and sex differences in functional lateralities. Laterality 1996; 1: 51–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar