Response of Monkey Glabrous Skin Mechanoreceptors to Random-Noise Sequences: I. Temporal Response Characteristics

References

• Bell J., Bolanowski S. J., Holmes M. H. The structure and function of Pacinian corpuscles: A review. Progr. Neurobiol. 1994; 42: 79–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolanowski S. J., Zwislocki J. J. Intensity and frequency characteristics of Pacinian corpuscles: I. Action potentials. J. Neurophysiol. 1984a; 51: 793–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolanowski S. J., Zwislocki J. J. Intensity and frequency characteristics of Pacinian corpuscles: II. Receptor potentials. J. Neurophysiol. 1984b; 51: 812–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen R. H., Vierck C. J. Population estimates for responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to a vertically indenting probe on the glabrous skin of monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 1993; 94: 105–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connor C. E., Hsiao S. S., Phillips J. R., Johnson K. O. Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. J. Neurosci. 1990; 10: 3823–3836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor C. E., Johnson K. O. Neural coding of tactile texture: Comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. J. Neurosci. 1992; 12: 3414–3426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman A. W., Johnson K. O. Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: Temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model. J. Physiol. 1982a; 323: 21–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman A. W., Johnson K. O. A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey. J. Physiol. 1982b; 323: 43–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French A. S. Mechanotransduction. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 1992; 54: 135–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• French A. S., Holden A. V., Stein R. B. The estimation of the frequency response function of a mechanoreceptor. Kybemetik 1972; 11: 15–23
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin A. W., John K. T., Darian-Smith I. Skin profiles during sinusoidal vibration of the fingerpad. Exp. Brain Res. 1989; 77: 79–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson R. S., Landström U., Lundström R. Response of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements. Brain Res. 1982; 244: 17–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson K. O., Hsiao S. S. Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 1992; 15: 227–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knibestöl M. Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J. Physiol. 1973; 232: 427–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knibestöl M. Stimulus—response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J. Physiol. 1975; 245: 63–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knibestol M., Vallbo A. B. Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. J. Physiol. 1980; 300: 251–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröller J., Grüsser O. J., Weiss L. R. The response of primary muscle spindle endings to random muscle stretch: A quantitative analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 1985; 61: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kröller J., Grüsser O. J., Weiss L. R. Observations on phase-locking within the response of primary muscle spindle afferents to pseudo-random stretch. Biol. Cybern. 1988a; 59: 49–54
   Google Scholar
• Kröller J., Grüsser O. J., Weiss L. R. Superimposing noise linearizes the responses of primary muscle spindle afferents to sinusoidal muscle stretch. Biol. Cybern. 1988b; 60: 131–137
   Google Scholar
• LaMotte R. H., Mountcastle V. B. Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate between vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: A correlation between neural events and psychophysical measurements. J. Neurophysiol. 1975; 38: 539–559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmarelis P. Z., Marmarelis V. Z. Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White-Noise Approach. Plenum Press, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Marmarelis V. Z. Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling. Plenum Press, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Phillips J. R., Johnson K. O., Hsiao S. S. Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1988; 85: 1317–1321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöpel B., Querfurth H. The transducer and encoder of frog muscle spindles are essentially nonlinear: Physiological conclusions from a white-noise analysis. Biol. Cybern. 1984; 51: 21–32
   Google Scholar
• Press W. H. Numerical Recipes in Pascal, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeEngland 1990
   Google Scholar
• Querfurth H. Receptor potentials of isolated frog muscle spindle evoked by sinusoidal stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 1985; 53: 60–75
   Google Scholar
• Querfurth H. Transducer action of isolated frog muscle spindle evoked by pseudorandom noise stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 1986a; 55: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Querfurth H. Encoder response of isolated frog muscle spindle elicited by pseudorandom noise stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 1986b; 55: 13–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talbot W. H., Darian-Smith I., Kornhuber H. H., Mountcastle V. B. The sense of flutter-vibration: Comparison of human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J. Neurophysiol. 1968; 31: 301–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery R. M., Gynther B. D., Rowe M. J. Vibrotactile sensitivity of slowly adapating type I sensory fibres associated with touch domes in cat hairy skin. J. Physiol. 1992; 453: 609–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner G., Mountcastle V. B. Neural activity in mechanoreceptive cutaneous afferents: Stimulus-response relations, Weber functions, and information transmission. J. Neurophysiol. 1965; 28: 359–397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar