226
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Measuring Uniocular Fields of Rotation: Modified Goldmann Perimetry Versus Aimark Perimetry

, DBO CASE, , PhD & , PhD
Pages 125-132 | Received 10 Mar 2014, Accepted 18 Jun 2014, Published online: 23 Jul 2014

References

  • Hanif S, Rowe FJ, O’Connor A. The comparative analysis of assessment methods for uniocular field of fixation. British and Irish Orthoptic Journal 2009;6:47–51
  • VonNoorden GK. binocular vision and ocular motility – theory and management of strabismus. 5th ed. Warrington: Mosby; 1995
  • Kestenbaum A. Clinical methods of neurolo-ophthalmological examinations. 2nd ed. New York and London: Grune and Stratton; 1961
  • Roper-Hall G. Duction measurements and limited ocular rotations. British Orthoptic Journal 1975;32:72–76
  • Kushner BJ. The usefulness of the cervical range of motion device in the ocular motility examination. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:946–950
  • Haggerty H, Richardson S, Mitchell KW, Dickinson AJ. A modified method for measuring uniocular fields of fixation: reliability in healthy subjects and in patients with Graves’s orbitopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:356–362
  • Gerling J, Lieb B, Kommerell G. Duction ranges in normal probands and patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy, determined using the Goldmann perimeter. Int Ophthalmol 1997–1998;21:213–221
  • Esser J, Melzer I. Comparison of monocular excursion measurements in normals and in patients with ocular motility disorders. In: Campos E, ed. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the International Strabismological Association. Modena: ETA; 1986. 285–292
  • Steel DH, Hoh HB, Potts MJ, Harrad RA. Uniocular fields of fixation in thyroid eye disease. Eye (Lond) 1995;9:348–351
  • Arens B. Estimation of duction ranges using visual acuity. In: Transactions of the 23rd meeting of the European Strabismological Association. Spiritus M, ed. Buren: Aeolus Press; 1997. 355–360
  • Mourits MP, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM, Koornneef L. Measuring eye movements in Graves’s ophthalmopathy. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1341–1346
  • Chamberlain W. Restriction in upward gaze with advancing age. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;1:341–346
  • Shechtman D, Shallo-Hoffmann J, Rumsey J. Maximum angle of ocular duction during visual fixation as a function of age. Strabismus 2005;13:21–26
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting the difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995;346:1085–1087
  • Mein J, Trimble R. Diagnosis and Management of ocular motility disorders. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1991
  • Hanif S, Rowe F, O’Connor A. A Comparative Analysis of Monocular Excursion Measures. Strabismus 2009;17:29–32
  • Jellema HM, Baader A, Pitz S, et al. Comparison of cyclodeviation and duction measurement in Graves’ orbitopathy patients using different devices. Strabismus 2011;19:43–51
  • Haag Streit International. Octopus 900 standard operating procedures. 2010. Accessed July 15, 2014. http://www.haag-streit.com/produkte/octopusr-900.html
  • Rowe FJ, Hanif S. Uniocular ocular rotation measures: Octopus versus Goldmann. Trans. 33rd European Strabismological Association 2009. Belgrade, Serbia; 55–58
  • Rowe FJ, Hanif S. Uniocular and binocular fields of rotation measures: Octopus versus Goldmann. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:909–919

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.