The Impact of Visual Impairment on Health-related Quality of Life in Rural Africa

References

• Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programmes. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, et al. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 1999;3(9):1–164
   Google Scholar
• Finger R, Hoffmann AE, Fenwick EK, et al. Patients’ preferences in treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in clinical routine. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(7):997–1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GC. Vision and quality of life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999;97:473–511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown MM, Brown GC, Sharma S. Value-based medicine [editorial]. Evidence-Based Eye Care 2002;3:8–9
   Google Scholar
• Brown GC, Brown MM, Sharma S. The reproducibility of ophthalmic utility values. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2001;99:199–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown MM, Brown GC, Sharma S, Busbee B. Quality of life associated with visual loss: a time tradeoff utility analysis comparison with medical health states. Ophthalmology 2003;110(6):1076–1081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Srinivasan G, Mei SS, et al. Utility values among glaucoma patients: an impact on the quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89(10):1241–1244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briesen S, Roberts H, Ilako D, et al. Are blind people more likely to accept free cataract surgery? A study of vision-related quality of life and visual acuity in Kenya. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010;17(1):41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filmer D, Pritchett L. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears. An application to educational enrollment in states of India. Demography 2001;38:115–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GC, Sharma S, Brown MM, Kistler J. Utility values and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:47–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah VA, Gupta SK, Shah KV, et al. TTO utility scores measure quality of life in patients with visual morbidity due to diabetic retinopathy or ARMD. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004;11(1):43–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Gazzard G, Au Eong KG, et al. Utility values in Singapore Chinese adults with primary open-angle and primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2005;14(6):455–462
   Google Scholar
• Crewe JM, Morlet N, Morgan WH, et al. Quality of life of the most severely vision-impaired. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011;39(4):336–343
   Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Gazzard G, Gomezperalta C, et al. Utility assessment among cataract surgery patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(4):785–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MM, Brown GC, Sharma S, et al. Utility values associated with blindness in an adult population. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85(3):327–331
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall PA, Hill AR, Dhillon B, et al. Quality of life and relative importance: a comparison of time trade-off and conjoint analysis methods in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91(6):766–772
   Google Scholar
• Polack S, Kuper H, Mathenge W, et al. Cataract visual impairment and quality of life in a Kenyan population. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:927–932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van dijk K, Lewallen S, Chirambo M, et al. Creation and testing of a practical visual function assessment for use in Africa: correlation with visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and near vision in Malawian adults. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:792–795
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagheri H, Memarian R, Alhani FJ. Evaluation of the effect of group counselling on post myocardial infarction patients: determined by an analysis of quality of life. Clin Nurs 2007;16(2):402–406
   Google Scholar
• Vadstrup ES, Frølich A, Perrild H, et al. Health-related quality of life and self-related health in patients with type 2 diabetes: effects of group-based rehabilitation versus individual counselling. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renieri G, Pitz S, Pfeiffer N, et al. Changes in quality of life in visually impaired patients after low-vision rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 2013;36(1):48–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez Trillo A, Dickinson CM. The impact of visual and nonvisual factors on quality of life and adaptation in adults with visual impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53(7):4234–4241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SW, Boerner K. Staying connected: re-establishing social relationships following vision loss. Clin Rehabil 2008;22(9):816–824
   Google Scholar
• Mganga H, Lewallen S, Courtright P. Overcoming gender inequity in prevention of blindness and visual impairment in Africa. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2011;18(2):98–101
   Google Scholar
• Nutheti R, Shamanna B, Nirmalan PK, et al. Impact of impaired vision and eye disease on quality of life in Andhra Pradesh. IOVS 2006;47:4741–4748
   Google Scholar
• Pokharel G, Selvaraj S, Ellwein LB. Visual functioning and quality of life outcomes among cataract operated and unoperated blind populations in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:606–610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauer C, Pfeiffer N. The value of vision. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246(4):477–482
   Google Scholar
• Bejia I, Salem KB, Touzi M, Bergaoui N. Measuring utilities by the time trade-off method in Tunisian rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol 2006;25(1):38–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara AM, Wakholi BN, Kasirye A, et al. Utility assessment of HIV/AIDS-related health states in HIV-infected Ugandans. AIDS 2008;22(Suppl. 1):S123–S130
   Google Scholar
• Briesen S, Geneau R, Roberts H, et al. Understanding why patients with cataract refuse free surgery: the influence of rumours in Kenya. Trop Med Int Health 2010;15(5):534–539
   Google Scholar
• Lee BS, Kymes SM, Nease RF, et al. The impact of anchor point on utilities for 5 common ophthalmic diseases. Ophthalmology 2008;115(5):898–903
   Google Scholar