Comparison of different stimulation protocols efficacy in poor responders undergoing IVF: A retrospective study

References

• Tarlatzis BC , Zepiridis L , Grimbizis G , Bontis J . Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9:61–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay SD , Liversedge NH , Mathur RS , Jenkins JM . Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:521–527.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhen XM , Qiao J , Li R , Wang LN , Liu P . The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25:17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nargund G , Cheng WC , Parsons J . The impact of ovarian cystectomy on ovarian response to stimulation during in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 1996;11:81–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay SD , Liversedge NH , Jenkins JM . Could ovarian infection impair ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:252–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loh S , Wang JX , Matthews CD . The influence of body mass index, basal FSH and age on the response to gonadotrophin stimulation in non-polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1207–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Placido G , Mollo A , Clarizia R , Strina I , Conforti S , Alviggi C . Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist plus recombinant luteinizing hormone vs. a standard GnRH agonist short protocol in patients at risk for poor ovarian response. Fertil Steril 2006;85:247–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbaya TA , Kyrgiou M , Li TC , Stern C , Nardo LG . Low-dose aspirin for in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolibianakis EM , Venetis CA , Diedrich K , Tarlatzis BC , Griesinger G . Addition of growth hormone to gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation of poor responders treated by in-vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surrey ES , Schoolcraft WB . Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril 2000;73:667–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarali H , Esinler I , Polat M , Bozdag G , Tiras B . Antagonist/letrozole protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A comparative study with the microdose flare-up protocol. Fertil Steril 2009;92:231–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolcraft WB , Surrey ES , Minjarez DA , Stevens JM , Gardner DK . Management of poor responders: Can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol? Fertil Steril 2008;89:151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detti L , Williams DB , Robins JC , Maxwell RA , Thomas MA . A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1401–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lainas TG , Sfontouris IA , Papanikolaou EG , Zorzovilis JZ , Petsas GK , Lainas GT , Kolibianakis EM . Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1355–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmusi S , La Marca A , Giulini S , Xella S , Tagliasacchi D , Marsella T , Volpe A . Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2005;84:402–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manno M , Tomei F , Cervi M , Favretti C , Adamo V . Comparison of protocols efficacy in poor responders: Differences in oocytes/embryos competence with different protocols, a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1431–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed KA , Davies WA , Allsopp J , Lashen H . Agonist “flare-up” versus antagonist in the management of poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 2005;83:331–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A , Farhi J , Royburt M , Nahum H , Glezerman M , Levran D . Prospective evaluation of two stimulation protocols for low responders who were undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2003;79:886–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman MA , Erden HF , Tosun SB , Bayazit N , Aksoy E , Bahceci M . Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2001;16:868–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman K , Berker B , Atabekoglu CS , Sonmezer M , Cetinkaya E , Aytac R , Satiroglu H . Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril 2009;91:2437–2444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollenhoven B , Osianlis T , Catt J . Is there an ideal stimulation regimen for IVF for poor responders and does it change with age? J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins JM , Yovich JM , Edirisinghe WR , Yovich JL . Pituitary down-regulation using leuprolide for the intensive ovulation management of poor prognosis patients having in vitro fertilization (IVF)-related treatments. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1989;6:345–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugues JN , Cédrin Durnerin IC . Revisiting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols and management of poor ovarian responses to gonadotrophins. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:83–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasdemir M , Tasdemir I , Kodama H , Fukuda J , Tanaka T . Short protocol of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist administration gave better results in long protocol poor-responders in IVF-ET. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1996;22:73–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Padilla SL , Dugan K , Maruschak V , Shalika S , Smith RD . Use of the flare-up protocol with high dose human follicle stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins for in vitro fertilization in poor responders. Fertil Steril 1996;65:796–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer DW , Powers DR , Oskowitz SP , Liberman RF , Hornstein MD , McShane PM , Barbieri RL . Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use in assisted reproduction cycles: the influence of long and short regimens on pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 1999;72:83–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft I , Gorgy A , Hill J , Menon D , Podsiadly B . Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered ‘difficult responders’ to GnRH agonist protocols? Hum Reprod 1999;14:2959–2962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolettos N , Al-Hasani S , Felberbaum R , Demirel LC , Kupker W , Montzka P , Xia YX , et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a novel method of ovarian stimulation in poor responders. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;97:202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedrich K , Diedrich C , Santos E , Zoll C , al-Hasani S , Reissmann T , Krebs D , Klingmüller D . Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 1994;9:788–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahutte NG , Arici A . Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in poor responders. Fertil Steril 2007;87:241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar