Coexistence of adenomyosis in women operated for benign gynecological diseases

References

• Wéry O, Thille A, Gaspard U, van den Brûle F. Adenomyosis: Update on a frequent but difficult diagnosis. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2005;34:633–648.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molinas CR, Campo R. Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006;20:557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavilis D, Agorastos T, Tzafetas J, Loufopoulos A, Vakiani M, Constantinidis T, Patsiaoura K, Bontis J. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: Prevalence and relationship to operative findings and reproductive and menstrual factors. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1997;24:36–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vercellini P, Ragni G, Trespidi L, Oldani S, Panazza S, Crosignani PG. Adenomyosis: A déjà vu? Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:789–794.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss G, Maseelall P, Schott LL, Brockwell SE, Schocken M, Johnston JM. Adenomyosis a variant, not a disease? Evidence from hysterectomized menopausal women in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Fertil Steril 2009;91:201–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Templeman C, Marshall SF, Ursin G, Horn-Ross PL, Clarke CA, Allen M, Deapen D, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study. Fertil Steril 2008;90:415–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parazzini F, Mais V, Cipriani S, Busacca M, Venturini P; GISE. Determinants of adenomyosis in women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: Results from a prospective multicentric study in Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;143:103–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak S, Saha A. Adenomyosis: Still largely under-diagnosed. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;29:533–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazot M, Daraï E, Rouger J, Detchev R, Cortez A, Uzan S. Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, Itoh H, Nishimura K, Fujisawa I, Noma S, et al. Enlarged uterus: Differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;171:531–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Noe M, Kissler S, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis–prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2309–2316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, Thomassin I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Buy JN. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 2004;232:379–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza NM, Brosens JJ, Schwieso JE, Paraschos T, Winston RM. The potential value of magnetic resonance imaging in infertility. Clin Radiol 1995;50:75–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taran FA, Weaver AL, Coddington CC, Stewart EA. Understanding adenomyosis: A case control study. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1223–1228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker JD, Leondires M, Sinaii N, Premkumar A, Nieman LK, Stratton P. Persistence of dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pain after optimal endometriosis surgery may indicate adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2006;86:711–715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levgur M, Abadi MA, Tucker A. Adenomyosis: Symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:688–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokyol C, Aktepe F, Dilek FH, Sahin O, Arioz DT. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 in adenomyosis and endometrial polyps and its correlation with angiogenesis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2009;28:148–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brosens JJ, Barker FG, de Souza NM. Myometrial zonal differentiation and uterine junctional zone hyperplasia in the non-pregnant uterus. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:496–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JH, Ho HN, Yang YS. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies for adenomyosis. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2006;1:111–120.
   Google Scholar
• Siskin GP, Tublin ME, Stainken BF, Dowling K, Dolen EG. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: Clinical response and evaluation with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukunishi H, Funaki K, Sawada K, Yamaguchi K, Maeda T, Kaji Y. Early results of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery of adenomyosis: Analysis of 20 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:571–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novella-Maestre E, Carda C, Noguera I, Ruiz-Saurí A, García-Velasco JA, Simón C, Pellicer A. Dopamine agonist administration causes a reduction in endometrial implants through modulation of angiogenesis in experimentally induced endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1025–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laoag-Fernandez JB, Maruo T, Pakarinen P, Spitz IM, Johansson E. Effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and adrenomedullin in the endometrium in adenomyosis. Hum Reprod 2003;18:694–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlahos NF, Gregoriou O, Deliveliotou A, Perrea D, Vlachos A, Zhao Y, Lai J, Creatsas G. Effect of pentoxifylline on vascular endothelial growth factor C and flk-1 expression on endometrial implants in the rat endometriosis model. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1316–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Daguati R, Abbiati A, Fedele L. Adenomyosis: Epidemiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006;20:465–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar