Predictive factors for pregnancy during the first four intrauterine insemination cycles using gonadotropin

References

• Zayed F, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. Comparison between stimulated in-vitro fertilization andstimulated intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2408–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen NC, Herbert CM 3rd, Maxson WS, et al. Intrauterine insemination: a critical review. Fertil Steril 1985;44:569–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulmyer-Lacroix O, Molle L, Noizet A, et al. Intrauterine insemination with the husband’s sperm: conclusions of five years experience. Contracept Fertil Sex 1998;26:300–6
   Google Scholar
• , The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)Andersen AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1680–97
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, et al. Prognositc indicators for intrauterine insemination: statiscal model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1892–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirol A, Gurgan T. Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 2007;22:97–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federick JL, Denker MS, Rojas A, et al. Is there a role for ovarian stimulation and intra-uterine insemination after age 40? Hum Reprod 1994;9:2284–6
   Google Scholar
• Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Mol BWJ, et al. Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004;82:45–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N, et al. Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2010;93:79–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, et al. Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2002;78:1088–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iberico G, Vioque J, Ariza N, et al. Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1308–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, et al. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999;14:698–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantineau AE, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ. Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD005356
   Google Scholar
• Menken J, Trussell J, Larsen U. Age and infertility. Science 1986;233:1389–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmowski WP, Pry M, Ding J, Rana N. Cycle-specific and cumulative fecundity in patients with endometriosis who are undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;78:750–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy BC, Neal LM, Cooke ID. The clinical value of conventional semen analysis. Fertil Steril 1989;51:324–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadehmodarres S, Oladi B, Saeedi S, et al. Intrauterine insemination with husband semen: an evaluation of pregnancy rate and factors affecting outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:7–11
   Google Scholar
• Senapati S, Barnhart K. Aging endometriosis-associated infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011;54:720–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton JL, Gibson M, Blackmer KM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of clomiphene citrate and intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility or surgically corrected endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1990;54:1083–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado-Perez J, Perez-Rivadeneira E, Sanon-Julien F. The impact of endometriosis on the rate of pregnancy of patients submitted to intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2002;77:S51
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro DB, Algert C, Thornton KL, Nulsen JC. Endometrial thickness in women with endometriosis or unexplained infertility undergoing superovulation with intrauterine insemination. J Soc Gynecol Invest 1995;2:367
   Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curole DN, et al. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 1992;7:418–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolibianakis EM, Zikopoulos KA, Fatemi HM, et al. Endometrial thickness can not predict ongoing pregnancy achievement in cycles stimulated with clomiphene citrate for intrauterine insemination. Repro Biomed Online 2004;8:115-18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulam CB, Bustillo M, Soenksen DM, Britten S. Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1994;62:1004–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Gotleib L, Casper RF. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rated and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1999;71:81–3
   Google Scholar
• Dietterich C, Check JH, Choe JK, et al. Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;77:781–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoeli R, Ashkenazi J, Orvieto R, et al. Significance of increased endometrial thickness in assisted reproduction technology treatments. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:285–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghesquiere SL, Castelain EG, Spiessens C, et al. Relationship between follicle number and (multiple) live birth rate after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:589.e581–5
   Google Scholar
• Nulsen JC, Walsh S, Dumez S, Metzger DA. A randomized and longitudinal study of human menopausal gonadotropin with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:780–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverde AJ, Lambalk C, McDonnell J, et al. Further consideration on natural or mild hyperstimulation cycles for intrauterine insemination treatment: effects on pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 2005;20:3141–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang BM, Wu TC. Effect of age on intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:93–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhel K, Schwarck S, Ashraf M, Abuzeid M. Semen parameters as determinants of success in 1662 cycles of intrauterine insemination after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 2005;84:S248–9
   Google Scholar