References
- Polge C. Functional survival of fowl spermatozoa after freezing at -79 degrees C. Nature 1951;167:949–50. PubMed PMID: 14843126
- Cohen J, Simons RF, Edwards RG, et al. Pregnancies following the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts. J In Vitro Fertiliz Embryo Transf: IVF 1985;2:59–64
- Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 1983;305:20–26
- Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril 1985;44:645–51
- Salame Y, Devreker F, Imbert R, et al. Contribution of cryopreservation in a mandatory SET policy: analysis of 5 years of application of law in an academic IVF center. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28:1059-66
- Vajta G, Kuwayama M. Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology 2006;65:236–44
- Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Human Reprod 2008;23:1976–82
- Desai NN, Goldberg JM, Austin C, Falcone T. The new Rapid-i carrier is an effective system for human embryo vitrification at both the blastocyst and cleavage stage. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RB&E 2013;11:41
- Jelinkova L, Selman HA, Arav A, et al. Twin pregnancy after vitrification of 2-pronuclei human embryos. Fertil Steril 2002;77:412–14
- Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18:536–54
- Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg S, et al. Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1545–9
- Pandian Z, Templeton A, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2681–7
- Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, et al. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod 1999;14:3077–9
- Stachecki JJ, Garrisi J, Sabino S, et al. A new safe, simple and successful vitrification method for bovine and human blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:360–7
- Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Baruffi RL, et al. Comparison of the cryopreservation of human embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a slow cooling or an ultrarapid cooling procedure. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:257–61
- Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:608–14
- Wilding MG, Capobianco C, Montanaro N, et al. Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27:549–54
- Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, et al. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:434–7
- Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, et al. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:347–54
- Liu SY, Teng B, Fu J, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2093–100