Counseling and management of patients requesting subcutaneous contraceptive implants: proposal for a decisional algorithm

References

• Welstoff CF. Revising unmet need for family planning. Princeton: DHS Analytical Studies 28 USAID, September 2012
   Google Scholar
• Is education the best contraceptive? Measure communication. Policy Brief. Washington, DC: Measure Communications, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Rovner J. US abortion survey produces surprise statistics. Lancet 2006;348:470
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;34:294–303
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach C, Compernolle LP, Helfferich C, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion in the United States and Europe: why so different? Oct 2012 Available from: http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/pdf/pubs/international-comparisons.pdf [last accessed 31 Jul 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Merckx M, Donders GG, Grandjean P, et al. Does structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011;16:418–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Burnhill MS. Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation. Fam Plan Perspect 1998;30:89–92, 104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davie JE, Walling MR, Mansour DJ, et al. Impact of patient counseling on acceptance of the levonorgestrel implant contraceptive in the United Kingdom. Clin Ther 1996;18:150–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubacher D, Goco N, Gonzalez B, Taylor D. Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA. Contraception 1999;60:345–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman T, Huhtala S, Luoto R, et al. Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:608–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobstein R, Curtis C, Spieler J, Radloff S. Meeting the need for modern contraception: effective solution to a pressing global challenge. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2013;121:S9–15
   Google Scholar
• Jacobstein R, Stanley H. Contraceptive implant: providing better choice to meet growing family planning demand. Glob Health: Sci Pract 2013;1:11–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer JF, Mancuso P. Case study: bleeding with etonogestrel implant. NURS 6045-DNP Practicum II
   Google Scholar
• Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, et al. Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:865–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern V, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Gallo MF. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011;4:1–35
   Google Scholar
• Machado RB, Pompei LM, Giribela A, de Melo NR. Impact of standardized information provided by gynecologists on women’s choice of combined hormonal contraception. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013;26:1–4
   Google Scholar
• Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:115e1–115e7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper DJ. Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey. Clin Drug Investig 2010;30:749–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez N, Kindrat T, Pagels P, et al. Health literacy, health information seeking behaviors and internet use among patients attending a private and public clinic in the same geographic area. J Community Health 2014;39:83–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman S. Nondaily hormonal contraception: considerations incontraceptive choice and patient counseling. JAm Acad Nurse Pract 2004;16:226–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson AL. Communicating with patients about extended-cycle and continuous use of oral contraceptives. J Womens Health 2007;16:463–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock CL, Prior JC. Evidence about extending the duration of oral contraceptive use to suppress menstruation. Women Health Issues 2004;14:201–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman AB, Gallo MF, Jensen JT, et al. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;20:CD004695
   Google Scholar
• Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. UK medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Nov 2009. Available from: http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/UKMEC2009.pdf [last accessed 31 Jul 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Mansour D, Bahamondes L, Crichley H, et al. The management of unacceptable bleeding patterns in etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant users. Contraception 2011;83:202–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. Management of unscheduled bleeding in women using hormonal contraception. May 2009. Available from: http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/unscheduledbleedingmay09.pdf [last accessed 31 Jul 2013]
   Google Scholar