Obstetric and perinatal outcome from single cleavage transfer and single blastocyst transfer: a matched case–control study

References

• Gerris J. Single-embryo transfer versus multiple-embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:63–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Akker OB, Purewal S. Elective single-embryo transfer: persuasive communication strategies can affect choice in a young British population. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:838–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, et al. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2008;23:91–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;7:CD002118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, et al. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1514–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:551–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. Knowledge synthesis group. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;146:138–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012;97:324–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB, et al. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1144–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Australia Hum Reprod 2010;25:265–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwärzler P, Zech H, Auer M, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2097–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källén B, Finnström O, Lindam A, et al. Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome? Fertil Steril 2010;94:1680–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar S, Librach CL, Gunby J, et al. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies after blastocyst versus Day 3 embryo transfer: Canadian ART Register (CARTER) analysis. Hum Reprod 2013;28:924–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando D, Halliday JL, Breheny S, Healy DL. Outcomes of singleton births after blastocyst versus nonblastocyst transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2012;97:579–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, et al. Fetal/Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics 2001;108:E35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinblatt SL, Ishai L, Shehata F, et al. Effects of ovarian endometrioma on embryo quality. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2700–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, et al. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2004;81:551–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the Society for assisted reproductive technology and practice committee of the American society for reproductive medicine. Elective single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2012;97:835–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Van Montfoort AP, et al. Effect of in vitro culture of human embryo on birthweight of newborns. Hum Reprod 2010;25:605–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergouw CG, Kostelijk EH, Doejaaren E, et al. The influence of the type of embryo culture medium on neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer in IVF. Hum Reprod 2012;27:2619–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012;98:368–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy TK, Bradley CK, Bowman MC, McArthur SJ. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1294–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Kalampokas T, Davidson J, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013;100:1615–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikkeus P, Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1073–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar