The importance of user compliance on the effectiveness of natural family planning programs

References

• Djerasse C. The bitter pill. Science 1989; 245: 356–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guida M, Tommaselli GA, Pellicano M, et al. An overview on the effectiveness of natural family planning. Gynecol Endocrinol 1997; 11: 203–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Natural Family Planning, Guide to Service. WHO, Geneva 1988
   Google Scholar
• Knaus H. Uber den Zeitfunk der Konzeptions-fahlgkeit der Weibes im Intermenstrum. Munch Med Weschr 1929; 76: 1157–60
   Google Scholar
• Ogino K. Ovulazionsterimn und Konzeptionsterrmn. Zentralbl Gynakol 1930; 54: 464–79
   Google Scholar
• Ferin J. Determination de la periode sterile premenstruelle par la courbe thermique. Bruzelles Medica 1947; 27: 2786–93
   Google Scholar
• Billings EL, Billings JJ, Brown JB, Burger HG. Symptoms and hormonal changes accompanying ovulation. Lancet 1972; 1: 282–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Task force on methods of the determination of the fertile period. Temporal relationship between ovulation and defined changes in the concentrations of plasma estradiol-17β, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and progesterone. I. Probit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 283–90
   Google Scholar
• Collins WP, Collins PO, Kilpatrick MJ, et al. The measurement of urinary oestrone-3-glucuronide, LH, and pregnanediol-3d-α-glucuronide as indices of ovarian function. Acta Endocrinol (Copenhagen) 1979; 90: 336–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guida M, Barbato M, Bruno P, et al. Salivary ferning and the menstrual cycle in women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1993; 20: 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso S, Bellante FP, Di Simone N, . Advances on skin characterization in androgenized women. Major Advances in Human Reproduction, AR Genazzani, et al. Raven Press, New York 1990; 335–40
   Google Scholar
• Keefe EF. Self-observation of the cervix to distinguish days of possible fertility. Bull Sloane Hosp Women 1974; 4: 129–36
   Google Scholar
• Thapa S, Short RV, Potts M. Breastfeeding and its effects on child survival. Nature (London) 1988; 335: 679–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy KI, Rivera R, McNeilly AS. Consensus statement on the use of breastfeeding as a family planning method. Contraception 1989; 39: 477–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Health International. Consensus statement, breastfeeding as a family planning method. Lancet 1988; 2: 1204–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rotzen J. Erweiterte Basaltemperaturmessunh und Empfangnisrefeling. Arch Gynakol 1968; 206: 195–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanford JB, Lemaire JC, Thurman PB. Women's interest in natural family planning. J Fam Pract 1998; 46: 65–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Task force on methods of the determination of the fertile period. A prospective multicenter trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. (II. The effectiveness phase.). Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 591–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Grummer-Strawn L. Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 2054–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade ME, McCarthy P, Braustein GD, et al. A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 368–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice FJ, Lanctot CA, Garcia-Devesa C. Effectiveness of the sympto–thermal method of natural family planning: an international study. Int J Fertil 1981; 26: 222–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray RH, Kambic RT, Lanctot CA, et al. Evaluation of natural family planning programmes in Liberia and Zambia. J Biosoc Sci 1993; 25: 249–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato M, Boerci M, Bozzo G. Studio retrospettivo C.A.Me.N. dopo 15 anni di lavoro. In Proceedings of the International FIDAF Congress, Dublin, 1995, 45–9
   Google Scholar
• Freundl G. Studio prospettico multicentrico sull'efficacia della regolazione naturale della fertilità (RNF) 1989–1993. In Proceedings of the International FIDAF Congress, Dublin, 1995, 52–6
   Google Scholar
• Tommaselli GA, Guida M, Palomba S, et al. Using complete breast-feeding and lactational amenorrhoea as space births methods. 2000, Contraception; in press
   Google Scholar
• France M, France J, Townend K. Natural family planning in New Zealand: a study of continuation rates and characteristics of users. Adv Contracept 1997; 13: 191–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Temporal relationship between indices of the fertile period. Fertil Steril 1985; 39: 647–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. A prospective multicentric study to develop universal immunochemical tests for predicting the fertile period. Int J Fertil 1985; 30: 18–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton SJ, Pepperel RS, Brown JB. Home monitoring of gonadotropin ovulation induction using the Ovarian Monitor. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 1076–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France JT, Graham FM, Gosling L, et al. Charcteristics of natural conception cycles occurring in a prospective study of sex preselection: fertility awareness symptoms, hormone levels, sperm survival and pregnancy outcome. Int J Fertil 1992; 36: 244
   Google Scholar
• Lewis JG, Manley L, Whitlow JC, Elder PA. Re-examining steroid hormone metabolites as ovulation markers using monoclonal antibodies. Steroids 1994; 59: 288–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JB, Blackwell LF. Use of the Home Monitor in pregnancy avoidance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 2008–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnoth C, Frank-Hermann P, Freundl G, et al. Sexual behaviour of natural family planning users in Germany and its changes over time. Adv Contracept 1995; 11: 173–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Multi-center Study. Prospective European multi-center study on natural family planning (1989–1992): interim results. Adv Contracept 1993; 9: 269–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank-Hermann P, Freundl G, Gnoth C, et al. Natural family planning with and without barrier method use in the fertile phase: efficacy in relation to sexual behaviour: a German prospective long-term study. Adv Contracept 1997; 13: 179–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freundl G, Brenime M, Frank-Hermann P, et al. The CUE fertility monitor compared to ultrasound and LH peak measurements for fertile time ovulation detection. Adv Contracept 1996; 12: 111–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moreno JE, Khan-Dawood FS, Goldzieher JW. Natural family planning: suitability of the CUE (TM) method for defining the time of ovulation. Contraception 1997; 55: 233–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faundes A, Lamprecht V, Osis MJ, Lopes BC. Simplifying natural family planning: preliminary report of a pilot study of the ‘collar’ method in Brazil. Adv Contracept 1997; 13: 167–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar