60
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Art

Mild stimulation in assisted reproduction

, , &
Pages 261-264 | Received 24 Jul 2009, Accepted 29 Sep 2009, Published online: 11 Jan 2010

References

  • Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;2:366.
  • Barri PN, Coroleu B, Martinez F. Stimulation protocols for poor responders and aged women. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000;166:15–20.
  • Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Macklon N, Heijnen EMEW, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ. Predictors of low response to mild ovarian stimulation initiated on cycle day 5 for IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1919–1924.
  • Heijnen EM, Eijkemans MJ, De Klerk C, Beckers NG, Klinkert ER, Broekmans FJ, Passchier J, Te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC, A mild treatment strategy for invitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2007 Mar 3;369(9563):743–749. PubMed PMID: 17336650.
  • Pennings G, Ombelet W. Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2075–2079.
  • Flisser, et al Patient friendly IVF: how should it be defined? Fertil Steril 2007;88:547–549.
  • Nygren KG. Single embryo transfer: the role of natural cycle/minimal stimulation IVF in the future. RBM Online 2007;14:55.
  • Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Macklon NS, Heijnen EMW, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ. Predictors of ongoing pregnancy after single-embryo transfer following mild stimulation for IVF. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1159–1165.
  • Polinder S, Heijnen EMEW, Macklon NS, Habbema JDF, Fauser BJCM, Eijkemans MJC. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint. Hum Reprod 2007;23:316–323.
  • Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ, Van Opstal D, Beckers GM, Verhoeff A, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM. Milder stimulation for in vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2007;22:980–988.
  • Katz P, Nachtigall R, Showstack J. The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4:S29–S32.
  • Nachtigall RD. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril 2006;85:871–875.
  • Hohmann FP, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with GnRH antagonist cotreatment for IVF commencing rec-FSH on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:166–173.
  • Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Macklon NS, Heijnen EMEW, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ. Predictors of low ovarian response to mild stimulation initiated on cycle day 5 for IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1919–1924.
  • Pelinck MJ, Vogel NEA, Arts EGJM, Simons AHM, Heineman MJ, Hock A. Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2463–2270.
  • International Committee for Monitoring ART (ICMART). World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1586–1622.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.