A model for developing outcome measures from the perspectives of mental health service users

References

• Bluthenthal RN, Jones L, Fackler-Lowrie N, Ellison M, Booker T, Jones F, , Wells KB, et al. Witness for wellness: Preliminary findings from a community-academic participatory research mental health initiative. Ethnicity and Disease 2006; 16: 18–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006; 3: 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Cay EL, Small WP, Neilson J, Henderson A. Patients assessment of the result of surgery for peptic ulcer. Lancet 1975; 305(7897)29–31
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research?. Social Science and Medicine 1995; 41: 1667–1676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford M, Robothom, D., Lavanya, T., Patterson, S., Weaver, T., Barber, R. & Rose, D. (submitted). Selecting outcome measures in mental health: The views of service users. Journal of Mental Health
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner A, Thomas P. User-led research and evidence-based medicine. British Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 180: 1–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones D. Evaluating patient based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessments 1998; 2: 14
   Google Scholar
• Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 1948; 32: 221–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman G, Shepperd S, Robinson I, Ehrich K, Richards S. Continuity of Care – A Scoping Exercise. National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery Organization Research and Development (NCCSDO), London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Gillard S, Borschmann R, Turner K, Goodrich-Purnell N, Lovell K, Chambers M. What difference does it make?’ Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients. Health Expectations 2010; 13: 185–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield T, Attkisson C. The UCSF client satisfaction scales: II. The service satisfaction scale – 30. Psychological Testing: Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment, M Maruish. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2004; 813–837
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood K, Sweeney A, Williams S, Garety P, Kuipers E, Scott J, Peters E. Choice of outcome in CBT for psychoses (CHOICE): The development of a new service user-led outcome measure of CBT for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2010; 36: 126–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce A, Wild C, Adair C, McDougall G, Gordon A, Costigan N, , Barnes F, et al. Continuity of care in mental health services: Toward clarifying the construct. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2004; 49: 539–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin I-K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason R, Boutilier M. The challenge of genuine power sharing in participatory research: The gap between theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 1996; 15: 145–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 50–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi 1993
   Google Scholar
• Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2003
   Google Scholar
• O’Fallon L, Dearry A. Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives 2002; 110S2: 155–159
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer AN. Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. Heinemann, London 1966
   Google Scholar
• Rose D. Collaborative research between users and professionals: Peaks and pitfalls. Psychiatric Bulletin 2003; 27: 404–406
   Google Scholar
• Rose D, Wykes T, Leese M, Bindman J, Fleischmann P. Patients’ perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: Systematic review. British Medical Journal 2003; 326: 1363–1366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D, Wykes T, Farrier D, Dolan A-M, Sporle T, Bogner D. What do clients think of cognitive remediation therapy? A consumer-led investigation of satisfaction and side effects. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation 2008; 11: 81–204
   Google Scholar
• Rose D, Sweeney A, Leese M, Clement S, Jones IR, Burns T, , Wykes T, et al. Developing a user-generated measure of continuity of care: Brief report. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2009; 119: 320–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright C. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy 2005; 85: 257–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware NC, Dickey B, Tugenberg T, McHorney CA. CONNECT: A measure of continuity of care in mental health services. Mental Health Services Research 2003; 5: 209–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar