Recovery in Austria: Mental health trialogue

References

• Amering, M. (2010a). Trialog – An exercise in communication between consumers, carers and professional mental health workers beyond role stereotypes. International Journal of Integrated Care, 10, S014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amering, M. (2010b). Trialogue in Beijing – Meeting of Chinese and international users, carers and mental health workers beyond role stereotype. WPA News, September, p. 15. http://www.wpanet.org/uploads/Newsletters/WPA_Newsletter/Past_Issues/news3-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amering, M., Hofer, H. & Rath, I. (2002). The ‘First Vienna Trialogue’ – Experiences with a new form of communication between users, relatives and mental health professionals. In: H.P. Lefley & D.L. Johnson (Eds), Family Interventions in Mental Illness: International Perspectives, (pp. 105–124). Westport, CT and London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Amering, M. & Schmolke, M. (2009). Recovery in Mental Health. Reshaping Scientific and Clinical Responsibilities. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, T., Buck, D. & Esterer, I. (2000). Es ist normal, verschieden zu sein. Psychose-Seminare und Hilfen zum Dialog. Arbeitshilfe 10. Bonn: Psychiatrie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, T. & Priebe, S. (2005). Psychosis seminars: An unconventional approach. Psychiatric Services, 56, 1441–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, D. (2007). Keynote speech, WPA Thematic Conference on Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry, June. http://www.bpe-online.de/verband/rundbrief/2007/2/buck-wpa-2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., O’Connell, M., Tondora, J., Styron, T. & Kangas, K. (2006). The top ten concerns about recovery encountered in mental health system transformation. Psychiatric Services, 57, 640–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, P.E., Rapp, C., Holter, M. & Riefer, M. (2008). Best practices: A program to support shared decision making in an outpatient psychiatric medication clinic. Psychiatric Services, 59, 603–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUFAMI (2003). Trialogue: The benefits of three-way communication. http://www.eufami.org.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, M., Gagne, C., Anthony, W. & Chamberlin, J. (2005). Implementing recovery oriented evidence based programs: Identifying the critical dimensions. Community Mental Health Journal, 41, 141–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, H. (2005). Recovery based service delivery: Are we ready to transform the words into a paradigm shift? Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 4, 1–4. http://www.auseinet.com/journal/vol4iss3/glovereditorial.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, H. (1997). Die Verschwörung der Gleichgültigkeit. In CM. Smekal, H. Hinterhuber & U. Meise (Eds), Wider das Vergessen. Innsbruck: VIP-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lecic-Tosevski, D., Christodoulou, N., Herrman, H., Hosman, C., Jenkins, R., Newton J, ... Schmolke, M. (2003). WPA consensus statement on psychiatric prevention. Dynamic Psychiatry, 36, 307–315.
   Google Scholar
• McGorry, P.D. (1992). The concept of recovery and secondary prevention in psychotic disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 26, 3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehan, T.J., King, R.J., Beavis, P.H. & Robinson, J.D. (2007). Recovery-based practice: Do we know what we mean or mean what we know? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meise, U., Wancata, J. & Hinterhuber, H. (2008). Mental health care in Austria: History – developments – perspectives. Neuropsychiatrie, 22, 230–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. & Hollins, S. (2007). Recovery: Our common purpose? Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 13, 397–399.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., Thornicroft, G. & Slade, M. (2006). Who decides what evidence is? Developing a multiple perspectives paradigm in mental health. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 113, S109–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorius, N. (2002). Iatrogenic stigma of mental illness. BMJ, 324, 1470–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, I. & Fisher, H.L. (2011). Childhood trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with psychosis: Clinical challenges and emerging treatments. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 24, 514–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibitz, I., Swoboda, H., Schrank, B., Priebe, S. & Amering, M. (2008). Einbezug von Betroffenen in Therapie- und Versorgungsentscheidungen: professionelle HelferInnen zeigen sich optimistisch. [Mental health service user involvement in therapeutic and service delivery decisions: professional service staff appear optimistic] Psychiatrische Praxis, 35, 128–134.
   Google Scholar
• Slade, M., Amering, M. & Oades, L. (2008). Recovery: An international perspective. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 17, 128–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stastny, P. & Lehmann, P. (2007) (Eds.). Alternatives Beyond Psychiatry. Shrewsbury, UK and Eugene, OR: Lehmann.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Crowson, J. & Wallcraft, J. (2002). The recovery vision for mental health services and research: A British perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 245–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J., Amering, M., Freidin, J., Davar, B., Froggatt, D., Jafri, H., ... Herrman, H. (2011). Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers. World Psychiatry, 10, 229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J., Schrank, B. & Amering, M. (2009). Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (2005). Mental Health Action Plan for Europe: Facing the Challenges, Building Solutions. European Ministerial Conference on Mental Health, Helsinki, Finland, 12–15 January 2005. EUR/04/5047810/7.
   Google Scholar
• Zechmeister, I., Österle, A., Denk, P. & Katschnig, H. (2002). Incentives in Financing Mental Health Care in Austria. Journal of Mental Health Policy Economics, 5, 121–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar