References
- Chu A, Huber F J, Plott R T. The comparative efficacy of benzoyl peroxide 5% erythromycin 4%/zinc 1.2% solution in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 235–8
- Cunliffe W J, Caputo R, Dreno B, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of adapalene (CD271) gel and tretinoin gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. A European multicentre trial. J Dermatol Treat 1997; 8: 173–8
- Lucky A W, Henderson T A, Olson W H., et al. Effectiveness of norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in treating moderate acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37(5)746–54
- Lucky A W, Barber B L, Girman C J., et al. A multi rater validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35(4)559–65
- Burke B M, Cunliffe W J. The assessment of acne vulgaris: the Leeds Technique. Br J Dermatol 1984; 3: 83–92
- Classification of acne vulgaris. Acne: morphogenesis and treatment, G Plewig, A M. Kligman. Springer, New York 1974; 162–3
- Cook C H, Centner R L, Michaels S E. An acne grading method using photographic standards. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115(5)571–5
- Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller M J. A comparison of acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system. Int J Dermatol 1997; 36(6)416–18
- Motley R J, Finlay A Y. How much disability is caused by acne?. Clin Exp Dermatol 1989; 14: 194–8
- Fried R G, Shalita A R. The reciprocal interaction between acne and the psyche. Focus Cutis Psyche 1992; 11: 23–33