Bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna

References

• Abrahamson S, Bender MA, Conger AD, Wolff S. 1973. Uniformity of radiation-induced mutation rates among different species. Nature 245:460–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, Wiklendt AM, King BV. 2005. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. International Journal of Andrology 28(3):171–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balmori A. 2005. Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 24(2):109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Barteri M, Pala A, Rotella S. 2005. Structural and kinetic effects of mobile phone microwaves on acetylcholinesterase activity. Biophysical Chemistry 113(3):245–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baum JS, St George JP, McCall K. 2005. Programmed cell death in the germline. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 16(2):245–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bawin SM, Kaczmarek LK, Adey WR. 1975. Effects of modulated VMF fields, on the central nervous system. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 247:74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawin SM, Adey WR. 1976. Sensitivity of calcium binding in cerebral tissue to weak environmental electric fields oscillating at low frequency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 73:1999–2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawin SM, Adey WR, Sabbot IM. 1978. Ionic factors in release of 45Ca2+ from chick cerebral tissue by electromagnetic fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 75:6314–6318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev IY, Hillert L, Protopopova M, Tamm C, Malmgren LO, Persson BR, Selivanova G, Harms-Ringdahl M. 2005. 915 MHz microwaves and 50 Hz magnetic field affect chromatin conformation and 53BP1 foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Bioelectromagnetics 26(3):173–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belyaev IY, Markova E, Hillert L, Malmgren LO, Persson BR. 2009. Microwaves from UMTS/GSM mobile phones induce long-lasting inhibition of 53BP1/gamma-H2AX DNA repair foci in human lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 30:129–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman CF, Benane SG, Elder JA, House DE, Lampe JA, Faulk JM. 1980. Induction of calcium-ion efflux from brain tissue by radiofrequency radiation: Effect of sample number and modulation frequency on the power-density window. Bioelectromagnetics (New York) 1:35–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackman CF, Kinney LS, House DE, Joines WT. 1989. Multiple power-density windows and their possible origin. Bioelectromagnetics 10(2):115–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blettner M, Schlehofer B, Breckenkamp J, Kowall B, Schmiedel S, Reis U, Potthoff P, Schuz J, Berg-Beckhoff G. 2009. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: Phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 66:118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraglia M, Marra M, Mancinelli F, D'Ambrosio G, Massa R, Giordano A, Budillon A, Abbruzzese A, Bismuto E. 2005. Electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequency induce apoptosis and inactivation of the multi-chaperone complex in human epidermoid cancer cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology 204(2):539–548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavaliere V, Taddei C, Gargiulo G. 1998. Apoptosis of nurse cells at the late stages of oogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Development Genes and Evolution 208(2):106–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark MP. Networks and telecommunications. 2001. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rudiger H. 2005. Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutation Research 583(2):178–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond-Barbosa D, Spradling AC. 2001. Stem cells and their progeny respond to nutritional changes during Drosophila oogenesis. Developmental Biology 231:265–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhardt JL, Persson BRR, Brun AE, Salford LG, Malmgren LOG. 2008. Blood-brain barrier permeability and nerve cell damage in rat brain 14 and 28 days after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 27:215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaert J, Bauwens D. 2007. A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 26(1):63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foley K, Cooley L. 1998. Apoptosis in late stage Drosophila nurse cells does not require genes within the H99 deficiency. Development 125(6):1075–1082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garaj-Vrhovac V, Orescanin V. 2009. Assessment of DNA sensitivity in peripheral blood leukocytes after occupational exposure to microwave radiation: The alkaline comet assay and chromatid breakage assay. Cell Biology and Toxicology 25:33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA. 1992. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. The Journal of Cell Biology 119(3):493–501.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman EM, Greenebaum B, Marron MT. 1995. Effects of electro- magnetic fields on mollecules and cells. International Review of Cytology 158:279–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamnerius I, Uddmar Th. 2000. Microwave exposure from mobile phones and base stations in Sweden. Proceedings, International Conference on Cell Tower Siting, Salzburg; pp 52–63 (or from the website: www.land-salzburg.gv.at/cell tower)
   Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Mild KH, Morgan LL. 2007. Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: Increased risk associated with use for > or = 10 years. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 64(9):626–632 (Review).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. 2006. Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2006 Sep;79(8):630–639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardell L, Hansson Mild K. 2006. Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: Results of the interphone case-control study in five North European countries. British Journal of Cancer 94(9):1348–1349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. 2009. Epidemiological evidence for an association between use of wireless phones and tumor diseases. Pathophysiology 16(2–3):113–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M. 2009. Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. International Journal of Oncology 35:5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand F, editor. 2002. GSM and UTMS. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter H-P, Moshammer H, Wallner P Kundi M. 2006. Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63:307–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland GJ. 2000. Physics and biology of mobile telephony. The Lancet 356:1833–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission for Non Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 1998. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics 74:494–522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International EMF Project, EMF World Wide Standards. Accessed from the website: http://www.who.int/docstore/peh-emf/EMFStandards/who-0102/Worldmap5.htm
   Google Scholar
• Khurana VG, Teo C, Kundi M, Hardell L, Carlberg M. 2009. Cell phones and brain tumors: A review including the long-term epidemiologic data. Surgical Neurology 72(3):205–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koval TM, Hart RW, Myser WC, Hink WF. 1977. A comparison of survival and repair of UV-induced DNA damage in cultured insect versus mammalian cells. Genetics 87:513–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kundi M. 2004. Mobile phone use and cancer. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 61:560–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundi M, Hutter HP. 2009. Mobile phone base stations – effects on wellbeing and health. Pathophysiology 16:123–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwee S, Raskmark P. 1998. Changes in cell proliferation due to environmental non-ionizing radiation: 2. Microwave radiation. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 44:251–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H, Singh NP. 1995. Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics 16(3):207–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai H, Singh NP. 1996. Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 69(4):513–521.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai H, Singh NP. 1997. Melatonin and a spin-trap compound block radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation-induced DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics 18(6):446–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin-Liu S, Adey WR. 1982. Low frequency amplitude modulated microwave fields change calcium efflux rates from synaptosomes. Bioelectromagnetics (New York) 3:309–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Martin ME, Brogains J, Relova-Quinteiro JL, Cadarso-Suárez C, Jorge-Barreiro FJ, Ares-Pena FJ. 2009. The action of pulse-modulated GSM radiation increases regional changes in brain activity and c-Fos expression in cortical and subcortical areas in a rat model of picrotoxin-induced seizure proneness. Journal of Neuroscience Research 87:1484–1499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maber J. 1999. Data analysis for biomolecular sciences. Essex, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Magras IN, Xenos TD. 1997. RF radiation-induced changes in the prenatal development of mice. Bioelectromagnetics 8:455–461.
   Google Scholar
• Markova E, Hillert L, Malmgren L, Persson BR, Belyaev IY. 2005. Microwaves from GSM mobile telephones affect 53BP1 and gamma-H2AX foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(9):1172–1177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCall K. 2004. Eggs over easy: cell death in the Drosophila ovary. Developmental Biology 274(1):3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navarro EA, Segura J, Portolés M, Gómez-Perretta de Mateo C. 2003. The microwave syndrome: A preliminary study in Spain. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 22(2–3):161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Nezis IP, Stravopodis DJ, Papassideri I, Robert-Nicoud M, Margaritis LH. 2000. Stage-specific apoptotic patterns during Drosophila oogenesis. European Journal of Cell Biology 79:610–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezis IP, Stravopodis DJ, Papassideri I, Robert-Nicoud M, Margaritis LH. 2002. Dynamics of apoptosis in the ovarian follicle cells during the late stages of Drosophila oogenesis. Cell and Tissue Research 307:401–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund R, Leszczynski D. 2006. Mobile phone radiation causes changes in gene and protein expression in human endothelial cell lines and the response seems to be genome- and proteome-dependent. Proteomics 6(17):4769–4780.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Margaritis LH. 2004. Effect of GSM 900-MHz mobile phone radiation on the reproductive capacity of Drosophila melanogaster. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 23(1):29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Messini N, Karabarbounis A, Philippetis AL, Margaritis LH. 2000a. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation within ‘safety levels’ alters the physiological function of insects. In: Kostarakis P, Stavroulakis P, editors. Millennium International Workshop on biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Proceedings. Heraklion, Crete, Greece; 17–20 October 2000. pp 169–175.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. 2003a. Effects of electromagnetic fields on the reproductive capacity of Drosophila melanogaster. In: Stavroulakis P, editor. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Berlin: Springer. pp 545–578.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Messini N, Karabarbounis A, Filippetis AL, Margaritis LH. 2000b. A mechanism for action of oscillating electric fields on cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 272(3):634–640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Margaritis LH. 2002. Mechanism for action of electromagnetic fields on cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 298(1):95–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. 2002. Effects of different kinds of EMFs on the offspring production of insects. In: Kostarakis P, editor. 2nd International Workshop, Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Proceedings. Rhodes, Greece; 7–11 October 2002. pp 438–452.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. 2003b. Theoretical considerations for the biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. In: Stavroulakis P, editor. Berlin: Springer. pp 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Karabarbounis A, Margaritis LH. 2007a. Comparison of bioactivity between GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz mobile telephony radiation. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 26(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Nezis IP, Margaritis LH. 2007b. Cell death induced by GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz mobile telephony radiation. Mutation Research 626:69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. 2008. Mobile telephony radiation effects on living organisms. In: Harper AC, Buress RV, editors. Mobile telephones, networks, applications and performance. New York: Nova Science Publishersp. pp 107–149.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH. 2010. The identification of an intensity ‘window’ on the bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 86(5):00–00. [X-rref needed]
   Google Scholar
• Penafiel LM, Litovitz T, Krause D, Desta A, Mullins JM. 1997. Role of modulation on the effects of microwaves on ornithine decarboxylase activity in L929 cells. Bioelectromagnetics 18:132–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remondini D, Nylund R, Reivinen J, Poulletier de Gannes F, Veyret B, Lagroye I, Haro E, Trillo MA, Capri M, Franceschi C, Schlatterer K, Gminski R, Fitzner R, Tauber R, Schuderer J, Kuster N, Leszczynski D, Bersani F, Maercker C. 2006. Gene expression changes in human cells after exposure to mobile phone microwaves. Proteomics 6(17):4745–4754.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Marmgren L, Persson BR. 2003. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environmental Health Perspectives 111(7):881–883.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tisal J. 1998. GSM cellular radio telephony. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Velizarov S, Raskmark P, Kwee S. 1999. The effects of radiofrequency fields on cell proliferation are non-thermal. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 48:177–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viel JF, Clerc S, Barrera C, Rymzhanova R, Moissonnier M, Hours M, Cardis E. 2009. Residential exposure to radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations, and broadcast transmitters: A population-based survey with personal meter. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 66:550–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss NA. 1995. Introductory statistics. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Xenos TD, Magras IN. 2003. Low power density RF radiation effects on experimental animal embryos and foetuses. In: Stavroulakis P, editor. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Berlin: Springer. pp 579–602.
   Google Scholar