Induction of adaptive response in Drosophila after exposure to low doses of UVB

References

• Abraham SK. 1994. Antigenotoxicity of coffee in the Drosophila assay for somatic mutation and recombination. Mutagenesis 9:383–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afaq F, Adhami VM, Mukhtar H. 2005. Photochemoprevention of ultraviolet B signaling and photocarcinogenesis. Mutation Research 571:153–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Moraga A, Graf U. 1989. Genotoxicity testing of antiparasitic nitrofurans in the Drosophila wing somatic mutation and recombination test. Mutagenesis 4:105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai YL, Chen DQ. 1993. Accumulative effect of two low doses of irradiation in inducing an adaptive response in human lymphocytes. Mutation Research 302:191–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cai L, Wang P, Piao XG. 1994. Cytogenetic adaptive response with multiple small X-ray doses in mouse germ cells and its biological influence on the offspring of adapted males. Mutation Research 324:13–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daya-Grosjean L, Sarasin A. 2005. The role of induced lesions in skin carcinogenesis: An overview of oncogene and tumor suppressor gene modifications in xenoderma pigmentosum skin tumors. Mutation Research 571:43–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Flora S, Ferguson LR. 2005. Overview of mechanisms of cancer chemopreventive agents. Mutation Research 591:8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gruijl FR, Van Kranen HJ, Mullenders LH. 2001. UV-induced DNA damage, repair, mutations and oncogenic pathways in skin cancer. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B 63:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei H, Würgler FE. 1988. Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from Drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative or inconclusive result. Mutation Research 203:297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz-Niggli H, Schäppi-Büchi C. 1991. Adaptive response to dominant lethality of mature (class A) and immature (class B) oocytes of D. melanogaster to low doses of ionizing radiation: Effects in repair-proficient (yw) and repair-deficient strains (mei 41 D5 and mus 302D1). International Journal of Radiation Biology 59:175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Quispes WA, Carmona ER, Creus A, Marcos R. 2009. Genotoxic evaluation of two halonitromethane disinfection by-products in the Drosophila wing-spot test Chemosphere. 75:906–909.
   Google Scholar
• Graf U, Würgler FE, Katz AJ, Frei H, Juon H, Hall CB, Kale PG. 1984. Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Environmental Mutagenesis 6:153–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hader DP, Sinha RP. 2005. Solar ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage in aquatic organisms: Potential environmental impact. Mutation Research 571:221–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harish SK, Guruprasad KP, Mahmood R, Vasudev V, Manjunath KR, Chethan GK. 1998. Adaptive response to low dose of EMS or MMS in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 36:1147–1150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heo MY, Kim SH, Yang HE, Lee SH, Jo BK, Kim HP. 2001. Protection against ultraviolet B- and C-induced DNA damage and skin carcinogenesis by the flowers of Prunus persica extract. Mutation Research 496:47–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Dörr S, Greinert R, Volkmer B, Epe B. 2005. Visible light (395 nm) causes micronuclei formation in mammalian cells without generation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimmers. Mutation Research 572:142–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ikehata H, Nakamura S, Asamura T, Ono T. 2004. Mutation spectrum in sunlight-exposed mouse skin epidermis: Small but appreciable contribution of oxidative stress-mediated mutagenesis. Mutation Research 556:11–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kastenbaum MA, Bowman KO. 1970. Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutation Research 9:527–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya B, Yanıkoğlu A, Creus A, Marcos R. 2000a. Genotoxicity testing of five herbicides in the Drosophila wing spot test. Mutation Research 465:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya B, Creus A, Yanıkoğlu A, Cabre O, Marcos R. 2000b. Use of the Drosophila wing spot test in the genotoxicity testing of different herbicides. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 36:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya B, Creus A, Velázquez A, Yanıkoğlu A, Marcos R. 2000c. Induction of adaptive response in Drosophila imaginal disc cells exposed in vivo to low doses of alkylating agents. Mutagenesis 15:337–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaya B, Kocaoglu S, Demir E. 2006. Analysis of UV-stimulated recombination in the Drosophila SMART assay. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 47:357–361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsley DL, Zimm GG, editors. 1992. The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood R, Vasudev V. 1992. Inducible protective processes in animal systems. III. Adaptive response of meiotic cells of the grasshopper, Poecilocerus pictus, to a low dose of ethyl methanesufonate. Mutation Research 283:243–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michaelis A, Reiger R, Nicoloff H. 1988. Effects of ethidium bromide and nalidixic acid pre-treatment on the induction of chromatid aberrations by TEM and maleic hyrazide in Vicia faba main root meristems. Mutation Research 208:83–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Negishi T, Takinami S, Nikaido O, Mochizuki M, Shima M. 1999. Somatic cell mutation induced by sunlight in Drosophila. Journal of Epidemiology 9:66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Negishi T, Nagaoka C, Hayatsu H, Suzuki K, Hara T, Kubota M, Watanabe M, Hieda K. 2001. Somatic-cell mutation induced by UVA and monochromatic UV radiation in repair-proficient and deficient Drosophila melanogaster. Photochemistry and Photobiology 73:493–498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olivieri G, Bodycote J, Wolff S. 1984. Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine. Science 223:594–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter CJ, Turenchalk GS, Xu T. 2000. Drosophila in cancer research. Trends in Genetics 16:33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger R, Michaelis A, Schubert I. 1985. Heat-shocks prior to treatment of Vicia faba root tip meristems with maleic hydrazide or TEM reduced the yield of chromatid aberrations. Mutation Research 143:79–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizki M, Kossatz E, Velazquez A, Creus A, Farina M, Fortaner S, Sabbioni E, Marcos R. 2006. Metabolism of arsenic in Drosophila metanogaster and the genotoxicity of dimethylarsinic acid in the drosophila wing spot test. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 47:162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson L, Cairns J. 1977. A new pathway for DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Nature 267:281–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick B, Vaughan P. 1991. Widespread adaptive response aganist environmental methylating agents in microorganisms. Mutation Research 250:211–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sengstag C. 1994. The role of mitotic recombination in carcinogenesis. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 24:323–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley JD. 1994. Chromosomal adaptive response in human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 138:9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soehnge H, Ouhtit A, Ananthaswamy HN. 1997. Mechanisms of induction of skin cancer by UV radiation. Frontiers in Bioscience 2:538–551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stary A, Robert C, Sarasin A. 1997. Deleterious effects of ultraviolet A radiation in human cells. Mutation Research 383:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takinami S, Mochizuki M, Hayatsu H, Nikaido O, Kubota M, Watanabe M, Hieda M, Hieda K, Negishi T. 2000. Somatic cell mutation and photoproduct formation in Drosophila induced by monochromatic UV light in sunlight. Environmental Toxicology 15:496–499.
   Google Scholar
• Ullrich SE. 2005. Mechanisms underlying UV-induced immune suppression. Mutation Research 571:185–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff S. 1992. Low-dose exposures and the induction of adaption. In: Sugahara T, Sagan LA, Aoyama T, editors. Low dose irradiation and biological defence mechanisms. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Würgler FE, Vogel EW. 1986. In vivo mutagenicity testing using somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. In: de Serres FJ, editor. Chemical mutagens, principles and methods for their detection. New York: Plenum Press. pp 1–72.
   Google Scholar