DNA integrity of human leukocytes after magnetic resonance imaging

References

• Cam TS, Seyhan N. 2012. Single-strand DNA breaks in human hair root cells exposed to mobile phone radiation. International Journal of Radiology Biology 2:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Carson JJL, Prato FS, Drost DJ, Diesbourg LD, Dixon SJ. 1990. Time-varying fields increase cytosolic free Ca2 + in HL-60 cells. American Journal of Physiology 259:C687–692.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EC. 2004. Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields). Official Journal of the European Union 24.5.2004 L 184:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Erkonen WE, Smith WL. 2010. Radiology: The basics and fundamentals of imaging. 3d ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams.
   Google Scholar
• Fenech M. 2000. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutation Research 455:81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geard CR, Osmak RS, Hall EJ, Simon HE, Maudsley AA, Hilal SK. 1984. Magnetic resonance and ionizing radiation: A comparative evaluation in vitro of oncogenic and genotoxic potential. Radiology 152:199–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genevieve CA, Mcnamee JP, Marro L, Vijayalaxmi, Bellier PV, Prato FS, Thomas AW. 2009. Assessment of genetic damage in peripheral blood of human volunteers exposed (whole-blood) to a 200 T, 60 Hz magnetic field. International Journal of Radiation Biology 85:144–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakilas AG, Holt SM, Hair JM, Loftin CW. 2010. Measurement of oxidatively-induced clustered DNA lesions using a novel adaptation of single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay). Current Protocols in Cell Biology 6(11):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann A, Agurell E, Beevers C, Brendler-Schwaab S, Burlinson B, Clay P, Collins A, Smith A, Speit G, Thybaud V, Tice RR. 2003. Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. Mutagenesis 18(1):45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SN, Alam SS. 2007. Genotoxicity and molecular changes of hemoglobin studies in rats exposed to 3 mT static magnetic field. Journal of Biological Sciences 7:1121–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh CH, Lee MC, Tsai-Wu JJ, Chen MH, Lee HS, Chiang H, Herbert WCH, Jiang CC. 2008. Deleterious effects of MRI on chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16(3):343–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: Applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies, Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 1998. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics 74(4):494–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2009. Statement on medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: Protection of patients. Health Physics 97:259–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancsits S, Diem E, Jahn O, Rüdiger HW. 2003. Intermittent extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA damage in a dose-dependent way. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 76(6):431–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubinyi G, Zeitler Z, Thuróczy G, Juhász P, Bakos J, Sinay H, et al. 2010. Effects of homogeneous and inhomogeneous static magnetic fields combined with gamma radiation on DNA and DNA Repair. Bioelectromagnetics 31:488–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labes MM. 1966. A possible explanation for the effect of magnetic fields on biological systems. Nature 211:968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H, Singh NP. 2004. Magnetic-field-induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells of the rat. Environmental Health Perspectives 112: 687–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Kim MS, Kim YJ, Choi YJ, Lee Y, Chung HW. 2011. Genotoxic effects of 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in cultured human lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 32:535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboff AR, Williams T, Strong DM, Wistar R. 1984. Time varying magnetic fields. Effect on DNA synthesis. Science 223:818–820.
   Google Scholar
• Liburdy R, Tenforde T, Magin R. 1986. Magnetic field-induced drug permeability in liposome vesicles. Radiation Research 108: 102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell DP, Omori T. 2008. Statistical issues in the use of the comet assay. Mutagenesis 23:171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyakoshi J. 2006. The review of cellular effects of static magnetic field. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 7:305–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad N, Bushong SC, Thornby JI, Bryan RN, Hazlewood CF, Harrell JE. 1984. Effect of nuclear magnetic resonance on chromosomes of mouse bone marrow cells. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2:37–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Repacholi MH, Greenebaum B. 1999. Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: Health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics 20: 133–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfi MR, Fresegna AM, Villani P, Pinto R, Marino C, Sarti M, et al. 2006. Exposure to radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz, GSM signal) does not affect micronucleus frequency and cell proliferation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: An interlaboratory study. Radiation Research 165:655–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfi MR, Sannino A, Perrotta A, Sarti M, Mesirca P, Bersani F. 2005. Evaluation of genotoxic effects in human fibroblasts after intermittent exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: A confirmatory study. Radiation Research 164:270–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer IB, Schreiber WG, Graf R, Schreiber EM, Jung D, Rose DM, et al. 2003. No influence of magnetic fields on cell cycle progression using conditions relevant for patients during MRI. Bioelectromagnetics 24:241–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JL, Crooks LE. 1982. NMR imaging produces no observable mutations or cytotoxicity in mammalian cells. American Journal of Roentgenology 139:583–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simi S, Ballardin M, Casella M, De Marchi D, Hartwig V, Giovannetti G, et al. 2008. Is the genotoxic effect of magnetic resonance negligible? Low persistence of micronucleus frequency in lymphocytes of individuals after cardiac scan. Mutation Research – Fundamental and Molecular Mechanism of Mutagenesis 645(1–2):39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simko M, Droste S, Kriehuber R, Weiss DG. 2001. Stimulation of phagocytosis and free radical production in murine macrophages by 50 Hz electromagnetic field. European Journal of Cell Biology 80:562–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. 1988. A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research 175:184–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Toama Y, Miyakoshi Y, Ikehata M, Yoshioka H, Shimizu H. 2006. Effect of static magnetic field on the induction of micronuclei by some mutagens. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 11:228–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tenforde TS. 2003. The wonders of magnetism. Bioelectromagnetics 24:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S., Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2003. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Criteria for significant risk investigations of magnetic resonance diagnostic devices. Washington, DC: Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).
   Google Scholar
• Valiron O, Peris L, Rikken G, Schweitzer A, Saudi Y, Remy C, Job D. 2005. Cellular disorders induced by high magnetic fields. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 22:334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayalaxmi, Prihoda TJ. 2009. Genetic damage in mammalian somatic cells exposed to extremely low frequency electro-magnetic fields: A meta-analysis of data from 87 publications (1990–2007)International Journal of Radiation Biology 85:196–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Sarje A, Che PL, Yarema KJ. 2009. Moderate strength (0.23– 0.28 T) static magnetic fields (SMF) modulate signaling and differentiation in human embryonic cells. BMC Genomics 10(356): 1–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilén J, Hauksson J, Mild KH. 2010. Modification of pulse sequences reduced occupational exposure from MRI switched gradient fields: Preliminary results. Bioelectromagnetics 31:85–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2006. Environmental health criteria 232. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz S, Cece H, Kaya I, Celik H, Taskin A, Aksoy N, et al. 2011. Impact of contrast enhanced MRI on lymphocyte DNA damage and serum visfatin level. Clinical Biochemistry 44:975–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar