Inter- and intra-laboratory comparison of a multibiodosimetric approach to triage in a simulated, large scale radiation emergency

References

• Ahmed EA, Agay D, Schrock G, Drouet M, Meineke V, Scherthan H. 2012. Persistent DNA damage after high dose in vivo gamma exposure of minipig skin. PLoS ONE 7:e39521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Barnard S, Barrios L, Fattibene P, de Gelder V, Gregoire E, Lindholm C, Lloyd D, Nergaard I, Rothkamm K, Romm H, Scherthan H, Thierens H, Vandevoorde C, Woda C, Wojcik A. 2013. Multibiodose radiation emergency triage categorisation software. Health Phys (accepted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Livingston GK, Abbott MG, Moquet JE, Hone PA, Jenkins MS, Christensen DM, Lloyd DC, Rothkamm K. 2009. Interlaboratory variation in scoring dicentric chromosomes in a case of partial-body x-ray exposure: Implications for biodosimetry networking and cytogenetic ‘triage mode’ scoring. Radiat Res 172:746–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeyens A, Swanson R, Herd O, Ainsbury E, Mabhengu T, Willem P, Thierens H, Slabbert JP, Vral A. 2011. A semi-automated micronucleus-centromere assay to assess low-dose radiation exposure in human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol 87:923–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiorgio M, Barquinero JF, Vallerga MB, Radl A, Taja MR, Seoane A, De Luca J, Oliveira MS, Valdivia P, Lima OG, Lamadrid A, Mesa JG, Aguilera IR, Cardoso TM, Carvajal YC, Maldonado CA, Espinoza ME, Martínez-López W, Méndez-Acuña L, Di Tomaso MV, Roy L, Lindholm C, Romm H, Güçlü I, Lloyd DC. 2011. Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods. Radiat Res 175:638–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin G. 1969. Biological dosimetry with particular reference to chromosome aberrations analysis, a review of methods. In: International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA). Handling of radiation accidents. Proceedings from the Symposium on the Handling of Radiation Accidents. Vienna, Austria. Vienna: IAEA. pp 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Fattibene P, Trompier F, Wieser A, Brai M, Ciesielski B, De Angelis C, Garcia T, Gustafsson H, Olag Hole E, Juniewicz M, Krefft K, Longo A, Leveque P, Lund E, Marrale M, Michalec B, Mierzwińska G, Rao JL, Romanyukha AA, Tuner H. 2013. EPR dosimetry intercomparison using smartphone touch screen glass. Radiat Environ Biophys (in revision).
   Google Scholar
• Garty G, Chen Y, Salerno A, Turner H, Zhang J, Lyulko O, Bertucci A, Xu Y, Wang H, Simaan N, Randers-Pehrson G, Yao L, Amundson SA, Brenner DJ. 2010. The RABIT: A rapid automatedbiodosimetry tool for radiological triage. Health Phys 98:209–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guipaud O. 2013. Serum and plasma proteomics and its possible use as a detector and predictor of radiation diseases. Adv Experim Med Biol 990:61–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn S, Barnard S, Rothkamm K. 2011. Gamma-H2AXx-based dose estimation for whole and partial body radiation exposure. PLoS ONE 6:e25113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1987. Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams. An international code of practice. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2000. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy. An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA Technical Report Series 398. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: Applications in preparedness for and Response to radiation emergencies. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 2012. ICRP statement on tissue reactions/Early and late effects of radiation in normal tissue and organs – threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. ICRP publication 118. Ann. ICRP 41(1/2).
   Google Scholar
• Romm H, Wilkins RC, Coleman NC, Lillis-Hearne PK, Pellmar TC, Livingston GK, Awa AA, Jenkins MS, Yoshida MA, Oestreicher U, Prasanna PGS. 2011. Biological dosimetry by the triage dicentric chromosome assay: Potential implications for treatment of acute radiation syndrome in radiological mass casualties. Radiat Res 175:397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury E, Bajinskis A, Barnard S, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Puig-Casanovas R, Deperas-Kaminska M, Gregoire E, Kulka U, Oestreicher U, Lindholm C, Moquet J, Rothkamm K, Sommer S, Thierens H , Vral A, Vandersickel V, Wojcik A. 2012. The dicentric assay in triage mode as a reliable biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents. Proceedings from the 13th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association. 2012 May 14–18. Glasgow, UK. Available from: http://www.irpa13glasgow.com/information/downloads/
   Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Deperas M, Gregoire E, Koivistoinen A, Lindholm C, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Puig R, Rothkamm K, Sommer S, Thierens H, Vandersickel V, Vral A, Wojcik A. 2013. Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. Mutat Res 756:174–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothkamm K, Barnard S, Ainsbury EA, Al-Hafidh J, Barquinero JF, Lindholm C, Moquet J, Perälä M, Roch-Lefèvre S, Scherthan H, Thierens H, Vral A, Vandersickel V. 2013a. Manual versus automated γ-h2ax foci analysis across five European laboratories: Can this assay be used for rapid biodosimetry in a large scale radiation accident? Mutat Res 756:170–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothkamm K, Beinke C, Romm H, Badie C, Balagurunathan Y, Barnard S, Bernard N. Boulay-Greene H, Brengues M, De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Greither R, Herodin F, Jones A, Knie1 T, Kabacik S, Kulka U, Lista F, Martigne P, Missel A, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Peinnequin A, Poyot T, Roessler U, Scherthan H, Terbrueggen B, Thierens H, Valente M, Vral A, Zenhausern F, Meineke V, Braselmann H, Abend M. 2013b. Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays. Radiat Res 180:111–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierens H, Vral A, Vandevoorde C, Vandersickel V, de Gelder V, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Rothkamm K, Barnard S, Ainsbury E, Sommer S, Beinke C, Wojcik A. 2013. Is a semi-automated approach indicated in the application of the automated micronucleus assay for triage purposes?Radiat Protect Dosimetry (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Trompier F, Bassinet C, Wieser A, De Angelis C, Viscomi D, Fattibene P. 2009. Radiation-induced signals analysed by EPR spectrometry applied to fortuitous dosimetry. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità 45:287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems P, August L, Slabbert J, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Thierens H, Vral A. 2010. Automated micronucleus (MN) scoring for population triage in case of large scale radiation events. Int J Radiat Biol 86:2–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woda C, Bassinet C, Trompier F, Bortolin E, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P. 2009. Radiation-induced damage analysed by luminescence methods in retrospective dosimetry and emergency response. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità 45: 287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar