Radiation and chemical mutagen induced somaclonal variations through in vitro organogenesis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

References

• Abdel-Hady MS, Okasha EM, Soliman SSA, Tallat M. 2008. Effect of gamma radiation and gibberellic acid on germination and alkaloid production in Atropa belladonna L. Aust J Basic Applied Sci 2: 401–405.
   Google Scholar
• Abdurakhmonov IY, Kushanov FN, Djaniqulov F, Buriev ZT, Pepper AE, Fayzieva N, Mavlonov GT, Saha S, Jenkins JN, Abdukarimov A. 2007. The role of induced mutation in conversion of photoperiod dependence in cotton. J Hered 98:258–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akhar FK, Bagheri A, Moshtaghi N, Nezami A. 2011. The effect of gamma radiation on freezing tolerance of chickpea (Cicer aretinum L.) at in vitro culture. J Biol Environ Sci 5:63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Safadi B, Ayyoubi Z, Jawdat D. 2000. The effect of gamma irradiation on potato microtuber production in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 61:183–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Safadi B, Elias R. 2011. Improvement of caper (Capparis spinosa L.) propagation using in vitro culture and gamma irradiation. Sci Hortic 127:290–297.
   Google Scholar
• Badigannavar AM, Katageri IS, Khadi BM. 2001. Induced mutations for genetic improvement of cotton-A review. J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 15:127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley CA. 1971. In vitro culture of fertilized cotton ovules. Bioscience 21:906–907.
   Google Scholar
• Bidabadi SS, Meon S, Wahab Z, Subramaniam S, Mahmood M. 2012. Induced mutations for enhancing variability of banana (Musa spp.) shoot tip cultures using ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS). AJCS 6:391–401.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Yang H, Lin B, Wang Y, Li W, Wang D, Zhang F. 2010. Effect of gamma-ray radiation on physiological, morphological characters and chromosome aberrations of minitubers in Solanum tuberosum L. Int J Radiat Biol 86:791–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidonis GH, Hamilton RH. 1983. Plant regeneration from callus tissue of Gossypium hirsutum L. Plant Sci Lett 32:89–93.
   Google Scholar
• de Ronde JA, Spreeth M, Mayaba N, van Rensburg WJ, Matole N. 2009. Evaluation and characterization of mutant cowpea plants for enhanced abiotic stress tolerance. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome: UN. pp 141–144.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson A. 1940. The mutation system of the chlorophyll apparatus. Lund Univ Arrstn 36:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbullah NA, Taha RM, Saleh A, Mahamad N. 2012. Irradiation effect on in vitro organogenesis, callus growth and plantlet development of Gerbera jamesonii. Hortic Bras 30:252–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann NE, Raja R, Nelson RL, Korban SS. 2004. Mutagenesis of embryogenic cultures of soybean and detecting polymorphisms using RAPD markers. Biol Plant 48:173–177.
   Google Scholar
• Honna S, Wittner SH, Pathak SC. 1963. Flowering and earliness in tomato. Inheritance of associated character. J Hered 54:212–218.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowicz-Cieslak J, Huynh OA, Brozynska M, Nakitandwe J, Till BJ. 2012. Induction, rapid fixation and retention of mutations in vegetatively propagated banana. Plant Biotechnol J 10:1056–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph R, Yeoh HH, Loh CS. 2004. Induced mutation in cassava using somatic embryos and identification of mutant plants with altered starch yield and composition. Plant Cell Rep 23:91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch AC, Sumita R, Rutherford RS, Snyman SJ, Watt MP. 2012. An in vitro mutagenesis protocol for the production of sugarcane tolerant to the herbicide imazapyr. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 48:417–427.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalchuk I, Molinier J, Yao Y, Arkhipov A, Kovalchuk O. 2007. Transcriptome analysis reveals fundamental differences in plant response to acute and chronic exposure to ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 624:101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestari EG. 2012. Combination of somaclonal variation and mutagenesis for crop improvement. J AgroBiogen 8:38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Li HZ, Zhou WJ, Zhang ZJ, Gu HH, Takeuchi Y, Yoneyama K. 2005. Effects of γ-radiation on development, yield and quality of microtubers in vitro in Solanum tuberosum L. Biol Plant 49:625–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers EL, Chee PW, Saranga Y, Paterson AH. 2007. Recent advances and future prospective in molecular breeding of cotton for drought and salinity stress tolerance. In: Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Jain SM, editors. Advances in molecular breeding toward drought and salt tolerant crops. The Netherlands: Springer. pp 775–796.
   Google Scholar
• Maluszynski M, Ahloowalia BS, Sigurbjornsson B. 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85:303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann C. 1997. Reseeding the green revolution. Science 277: 1038–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcu D, Cristea V, Daraban L. 2013. Dose-dependent effects of gamma radiation on lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata) seedlings. Int J Radiat Biol 89:219–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maya Kumari, Patil SR, Pudake RN. 2007. Effect of mutagen on callus induction and in vitro regeneration of soybean cultivar. Soybean Genetics Newsletter 34:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mba C. 2013. Induced mutations unleash the potentials of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Agronomy 3:200–231.
   Google Scholar
• Misra P, Datta SK, Chakrabarty D. 2003. Mutation in flower colour and shape of Chrysanthemum morifolium induced by γ-radiation. Biol Plant 47:153–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Badigannavar AM. 2010. Induction of genetic variability for fatty acid composition in a large seeded groundnut variety through induced mutagenesis. J SAT Agricl Res 8:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2000d. Induced variants in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) by in vitro mutagenesis. In: Proceedings of the national symposium on the Use of Nuclear and Molecular Technique in Crop Improvement. 6–8 December 2000; Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Mumbai, India. pp 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2001a. Effect of physical and chemical mutagens on sensitivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 26:21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2003. Induced alterations in oil, lipid and fatty acid composition in the mutant seeds of Gossypium hirsutum L. Cotton Sci 15:113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2007. Influence of in vitro mutagenesis on ovule culture and plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol 8:159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2011a. In vitro induction of mutation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and isolation of mutants with improved yield and fiber characters. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1793–1801.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2011b. Induced floral variations in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Mutat Rep 2:12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2011c. Ovule culture of cotton with in vitro mutagenesis. Isolation of mutant lines for improved oil, lipid content and fatty acid compositions. J Swamy Botanical Club 27:83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N. 2013. Variations in seed protein content of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) mutant lines by in vivo and in vitro mutagenesis. J Environ Biol 34:11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Pratibha PK, Vijendra Prabhu, Mahato KK, Vidhu SB, Radhakrishna Rao M, Gopinath PM, Satyamoorthy K. 2012. Influence of Helium-Neon laser irradiation on seed germination in vitro and physio-biochemical characters in seedlings of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) var. Mattu Gulla. Photochem Photobiol 88:1227–1235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Ramanathan B, Jayabalan N. 2002. Effects of gamma rays on seed protein profiles of Gossypium hirsutum L. Tropical Life Sci Res 13:87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Vasanth K, Jayabalan N. 2004a. In vitro regeneration of cotton plants from shoot tip explants – a simple and alternative method. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol 5:15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Vasanth K, Jayabalan N. 2004b. Induced twining and boll abnormalities in Gossypium hirsutum L. SAARC J Agric 2:167–173.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Vasanth K, Sivasankari D, Chandrasekar BR, Jayabalan N. 2007. Enhanced somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with in vitro mutagenesis. Biol Plant 51:430–435.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy A, Vasanth K, Jayabalan N. 2005. Induced high yielding mutant in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mutat Breed Newslett Rev 1:6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan SS, Sundaram V, Singh P. 1995. Fibre characteristic and spinner's perspective: Indian cotton scenario and research thrust to meet new challenges. J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 20:97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Parry MAJ, Madgwick PJ, Bayon C, Tearall K, Hernandez-Lopez A, Baudo M, Rakszegi M, Hamada W, Al-Yassin A, Ouabbou H, Labhilili M, Phillips AL. 2009. Mutation discovery for crop improvement. J Exp Bot 60:2817–2825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Percival AE, Stewart JM, Wendel JF. 1999. Taxonomy and germplasm resources. In: Smith CW, Cothren JT, editors. Cotton: Origin, history, technology and production. New York: John Wiley. pp 33–63.
   Google Scholar
• Premsekar S. 1986. Effect of gamma radiation on the expression of characters in intervarietal hybrids of cotton. J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 11:77–79.
   Google Scholar
• Qin YH, Liu JY. 2006. Cotton tissue culture and plant regeneration. Mol Plant Breed 4: 583–592.
   Google Scholar
• Qosim WA, Purwanto R, Wattimena GA, Witjaksono. 2011. Alteration of leaf anatomy of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) regenerants in vitro by gamma irradiation. Plant Mutat Rep 2:4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rai MK, Kalia RK, Singh R, Gangola MP, Dhawan AK. 2011. Developing stress tolerant plants through in vitro selection – an overview of the recent progress. Environ Exp Botany 71:89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha P, Raychaudhuri SS, Chakraborty A, Sudarshan M. 2010. PIXE analysis of trace elements in relation to chlorophyll concentration in Plantago ovata Forsk. Appl Radiat Isot 68:444–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seetohul S, Maunkee V, Gungadurdoss M. 2009. Improvement of taro (Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta) through in vitro mutagenesis. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. pp 296–299.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta M, Chakraborty A, Raychaudhuri S. 2013. Ionizing radiation induced changes in phenotype, photosynthetic pigments and free polyamine levels in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Appl Radiat Isot 75:44–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sestili F, Botticella E, Bedo Z, Phillips A, Lafiandra D. 2010. Production of novel allelic variation for genes involved in starch biosynthesis through mutagenesis. Mol Breed 25:145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivagaje A, Kasture M, Yadav D, Pandharikar N, Mathankar M. 2004. Cotton scenario in India. Curr Sci 87:8.
   Google Scholar
• Shu QY, Lagoda PJL. 2007. Mutation techniques for gene discovery and crop improvement. Mol Plant Breed 5:193–195.
   Google Scholar
• Shu QY. 2009. Turning plant mutation breeding into a new era: Molecular mutation breeding. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. pp 425–427.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora P, Chawade A, Larsson M, Olsson J, Olsson O. 2011. Mutagenesis as a tool in plant genetics, functional genomics and breeding. Int J Plant Genomics 2011:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Swami VD, Swami VBS. 1986. Effect of recurrent selfing and selection on plant type induced mutants from desi cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). Madras Agric J 73:66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Till BJ, Cooper J, Tai TH, Colowit P, Greene EA, Henikoff S, Comai L. 2007. Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol 7:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlekova N. 2010. Induced mutagenesis for crop improvement in Bulgaria. Plant Mutat Rep 2:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlekova N, Todorova V, Daskalov S. 2007. Creating variation in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) through induced mutagenesis. Plant Sci 44:44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Vagera P, Novak FJ, Vysko B. 1976. Anther cultures of Nicotiana tabacum L. Theor Appl Genet 47:109–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Esbroeck GA, Bowman DT. 1998. Cotton germplasm diversity and its importance in cultivar development. J Cot Sci 2:121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam P, Geetha N, Jayabalan N, Saravanababu S. 1999. Effect of gamma rays and ethyl methane sulphonate on in vitro regeneration in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Tissue Cult 9:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam P, Jayabalan N. 1996. Selection and regeneration of groundnut plants resistant to the pathotoxic culture filtrate of Cercosporidium personatum through tissue culture technology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 61:351–364.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam P, Jayabalan N. 1997b. Selection of groundnut plants with enhanced resistance to late leaf spot through in vitro mutation technique. Int Arachis Newsl 17:10.
   Google Scholar
• Wendel JF, Cronn RC. 2003. Polyploidy and the evolutionary history of cotton. Adv Agron 78:139–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JL, Wu C, Lei C, Baraoidan M, Bordeos A, Madamba MR, Ramos-Pamplona M, Mauleon R, Portugal A, Ulat VJ, Bruskiewich R, Wang G, Leach J, Khush G, Leung H. 2005. Chemical- and irradiation- induced mutants of indica rice IR64 for forward and reverse genetics. Plant Mol Biol 59:85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaka R, Chenal C, Misset MT. 2004. Effect of low doses of short-term gamma irradiation on growth and development through two generation of Pisum sativum. Sci Total Environ 320:121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang BH, Feng R, Li XL, Li FL. 1996. Anther culture and plant regeneration of cotton (Gossypium klotzschianium Antherss). Chinese Sci Bull 41:145–148.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang BH, Wang QL, Liu F. 2001. Phenotypic variation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) regenerated plants. Curr Sci 81:1112–1115.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang BH, Feng R, Liu F, Yao CB. 1999. Direct induction of cotton somatic embryogenesis. Chinese Sci Bull 44:766–767.
   Google Scholar